Kimmo Posted February 18, 2011 Posted February 18, 2011 i call male circumcision "mutilation" also. amazing there are as many adherents as there are, here in the "reformed" US. < shrug > many women like 'em cut < shrug > I'm sure many men like 'em cut too meaning-before i'm misunderstood- that many men won't marry women who haven't had the ritualistic mutilation performed. Quote
prole Posted February 18, 2011 Author Posted February 18, 2011 What about you, do you like 'em cut? Quote
Kimmo Posted February 18, 2011 Posted February 18, 2011 I get your point, but comparing male circumcision to the barbaric mutilation of female "circumcision" is pretty offensive. It's like the difference between a haircut and a beheading. and, just to belabor the point a little longer, my suggestion regarding male mutilation wasn't a "comparison" per se, only an apt rejoinder, since we were talking about genital mutilation. Quote
prole Posted February 18, 2011 Author Posted February 18, 2011 (edited) Mutilated genitals. Edited February 18, 2011 by prole Quote
Kimmo Posted February 18, 2011 Posted February 18, 2011 fascinating. especially the percentages of women supporting FGM. Quote
prole Posted February 18, 2011 Author Posted February 18, 2011 Fucking horrible. I condemn that shit. Quote
Hugh Conway Posted February 18, 2011 Posted February 18, 2011 i call male circumcision "mutilation" also. amazing there are as many adherents as there are, here in the "reformed" US. < shrug > many women like 'em cut < shrug > I'm sure many men like 'em cut too meaning-before i'm misunderstood- that many men won't marry women who haven't had the ritualistic mutilation performed. Oh. I thought you were talking about the gay men who liked it because of mostly eliminated risk of foreskin tears/rips/injuries during anal sex. Quote
prole Posted February 18, 2011 Author Posted February 18, 2011 Are you suggesting that uncircumcised straight men enjoy foreskin tears/rips/injuries during anal sex with women? Quote
Kimmo Posted February 18, 2011 Posted February 18, 2011 Fucking horrible. I condemn that shit. you were funnier carrying a gun in everett. Quote
prole Posted February 18, 2011 Author Posted February 18, 2011 Fucking horrible. I condemn that shit. you were funnier carrying a gun in everett. I'm deadly serious. That shit is some of the worst kind of medieval, patriarchical, sick, superstitiously oppressive quackery imaginable and has no place in a modern society. Quote
tvashtarkatena Posted February 18, 2011 Posted February 18, 2011 Um...yeah. Our bestest buddy: Bahrainian gubmint opens fires on funeral procession ...from helicopters...with machine guns. Oh, and grenades. Against a funeral march. Quote
tvashtarkatena Posted February 18, 2011 Posted February 18, 2011 A case for peaceful revolutions You gotta love adherents of Jefferson's famous 'blood of patriots and tyrants' quotes, given his own sorry military performance during the revolution and similar wide gaps between his statements and his behavior on a number of other issues regarding liberty. Bluster without performance was as popular then as now. The worst thing a revolution can do is attempt to fight the regime on its own terms: direct military confrontation. Much better to play on the dictatorship's weak spots - they always have plenty. Quote
KaskadskyjKozak Posted February 18, 2011 Posted February 18, 2011 A case for peaceful revolutions You gotta love adherents of Jefferson's famous 'blood of patriots and tyrants' quotes, given his own sorry military performance during the revolution and similar wide gaps between his statements and his behavior on a number of other issues regarding liberty. Bluster without performance was as popular then as now. The worst thing a revolution can do is attempt to fight the regime on its own terms: direct military confrontation. Much better to play on the dictatorship's weak spots - they always have plenty. TTK is even smarter than Thomas Jefferson! Quote
ivan Posted February 18, 2011 Posted February 18, 2011 TTK is even smarter than Thomas Jefferson! has similiar tastes in chicks at least Quote
tvashtarkatena Posted February 18, 2011 Posted February 18, 2011 (edited) Unlike the Great Man, I steer well clear of the teen scene, though. Jefferson was as much Fondling Daddy as he was Founding Father. Still, Sally Hemmings was, by all accounts, a hottie. Edited February 18, 2011 by tvashtarkatena Quote
tvashtarkatena Posted February 18, 2011 Posted February 18, 2011 Pound for pound though, Franklin's hit rate was higher. Quote
ivan Posted February 18, 2011 Posted February 18, 2011 Pound for pound though, Franklin's hit rate was higher. that's b/c after the kite expereince each chick old ben got into lit up like a slot machine and paid off in silver dollars. Quote
tvashtarkatena Posted February 18, 2011 Posted February 18, 2011 (edited) Old Ben went to France and basically stopped showing up for work. So many French ladies...so little time. Jefferson's early romantic attempts produced a lot of FAIL - including a bid for another wealthy Virginian's wife. The letter he sent her referring to his manhood wasn't a charmer, apparently. Victorian SHUT DOWN. Edited February 18, 2011 by tvashtarkatena Quote
tvashtarkatena Posted February 18, 2011 Posted February 18, 2011 Burr was another horny one - livin' large with the colonial bitchez one step ahead of his creditors. Quote
tvashtarkatena Posted February 18, 2011 Posted February 18, 2011 The whole Founding Fathers thing is pretty funny - those guys got along about as well as we Spraylords do. One might say that we're just continuing the argument they started. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.