StevenSeagal Posted December 22, 2009 Posted December 22, 2009 Looks like interest rates (ie inflation) might be heading up! Carter term 2 indeed..... linky Great news! It's finally worthwhile again to invest my savings in CD's and earn more money. And I'm locked in a 30 yr. fixed with a great rate. Quote
StevenSeagal Posted December 22, 2009 Posted December 22, 2009 When interest rates are near zero, there's only one way to go, btw. Quote
Peter_Puget Posted December 22, 2009 Author Posted December 22, 2009 Is that bad? Not all bad we can save on construction paper expense.... Quote
StevenSeagal Posted December 22, 2009 Posted December 22, 2009 and what would those skills be? There's still three years left in his term, moreover, after 11 months in office only a fool would have expected all our problems to be solved by now. I wasn't saying all of our problems should be solved. In 11 months he has reached the same level of srongly disapprove that Bush had when he left office. His Pres Index has reached new lows. (linky) He will soon have very little power to get things done - well he might be a large factor in the Dems losing power. I guess that is bipartisanship of sorts. Rightfully so, the public's patience is also at an all time low, so it's no surprise Obama's honeymoon was short lived. We know where you stand on Obama, how about now you please explain what you believe would be a better strategy to fix the economy and all the other problems. Because the GOP so far has nothing to offer apart from cynicism and obstruction, occasionally mixed with nostalgic desires for a return to Reaganomics and 1950's social values. If that's also your solution, elaborate on how this would fix the problem, please. Quote
olyclimber Posted December 22, 2009 Posted December 22, 2009 Earth saw clmate chnge4 ions;will cont 2 c chnges.R duty2responsbly devlop resorces4humankind/not pollute&destroy;but cant alter naturl chng Quote
prole Posted December 22, 2009 Posted December 22, 2009 Is that bad? Not all bad we can save on construction paper expense.... BUY GOLD, VOTE REPUBLICAN, AND PRAY!!!! Quote
artschool Posted December 23, 2009 Posted December 23, 2009 But we still don't know who can piss the farthest. Is it JB or PP? I want my ten minutes back. Quote
tvashtarkatena Posted December 23, 2009 Posted December 23, 2009 Earth saw clmate chnge4 ions;will cont 2 c chnges.R duty2responsbly devlop resorces4humankind/not pollute&destroy;but cant alter naturl chng Please run. Oh, please. Quote
billcoe Posted December 23, 2009 Posted December 23, 2009 SarahPAC believes energy independence is a cornerstone of the economic security and progress that every American family wants and deserves. Hey, not fair, they stole that from our beloved Barak! Quote
j_b Posted December 23, 2009 Posted December 23, 2009 But we still don't know who can piss the farthest. Is it JB or PP? I want my ten minutes back. if you expected some extreme display of macho posturing, you were bound to be disappointed. Quote
billcoe Posted December 23, 2009 Posted December 23, 2009 if you expected some extreme display of macho posturing, you were bound to be disappointed. Hire it out to the cats then: ...your satisfaction guarnfrikkanteed jb! Quote
olyclimber Posted December 23, 2009 Posted December 23, 2009 Peter! This should make you happy! Better make sure your kids learn Chinese. http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2009/dec/22/copenhagen-climate-change-mark-lynas Quote
olyclimber Posted December 23, 2009 Posted December 23, 2009 aren't the Chinese communists? how come their wall hasn't fallen over yet? Quote
olyclimber Posted December 23, 2009 Posted December 23, 2009 http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704107604574607793378860698.html here is a true capitalist outlook: buy a house boat and ride it out! Quote
prole Posted December 23, 2009 Posted December 23, 2009 (edited) http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704107604574607793378860698.html here is a true capitalist outlook: buy a house boat and ride it out! Ewww. You hit on a real sick fucker here. I'll take the Palin-ite irrationals over these fundamentalist deadenders any day. Now where have I heard argument before?... Edited December 23, 2009 by prole Quote
tvashtarkatena Posted December 23, 2009 Posted December 23, 2009 (edited) aren't the Chinese communists? how come their wall hasn't fallen over yet? Mr. Jintao, tear down this Wal-mart! Edited December 23, 2009 by tvashtarkatena Quote
tvashtarkatena Posted December 23, 2009 Posted December 23, 2009 (edited) http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704107604574607793378860698.html here is a true capitalist outlook: buy a house boat and ride it out! Just don't berth in Lake Powell...unless you've got some spare double wide axles, that is. Edited December 23, 2009 by tvashtarkatena Quote
G-spotter Posted December 23, 2009 Posted December 23, 2009 Lake Foul is pretty large for a water-birth. Quote
tvashtarkatena Posted December 23, 2009 Posted December 23, 2009 Lake Foul is pretty large for a water-birth. Why, then, is it full of ass-babies? That, unfortunately, is no joke. It is. Quote
j_b Posted December 23, 2009 Posted December 23, 2009 http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704107604574607793378860698.html here is a true capitalist outlook: buy a house boat and ride it out! Not only does the neo-liberal thatcherite want developing nations to ride it out but since he belongs to the church of the free market he shoves externalized costs under the rug hoping nobody will notice. "The reason we use carbon-based energy is not the political power of the oil lobby or the coal industry. It is because it is far and away the cheapest source of energy at the present time and is likely to remain so, not forever, but for the foreseeable future." What about the 1 trillion dollars and 2 more trillions we just committed to controlling Iraq's oil reserves? or the 100's of billions per year in environmental/resource destruction and human health factor involved in coal production? Quote
prole Posted December 23, 2009 Posted December 23, 2009 The overriding priority for the developing world has to be the fastest feasible rate of economic development, which means, inter alia, using the cheapest available source of energy: carbon energy. Moreover, the argument that they should make this economic and human sacrifice to benefit future generations 100 years and more hence is all the less compelling, given that these future generations will, despite any problems caused by warming, be many times better off than the people of the developing world are today. Ooo, I really like this part. For the best case scenario, one need only look at the paradise that the most successful, most carbon intensive city in the world presents to the majority of its residents every day: Los Angeles! Quote
Peter_Puget Posted December 23, 2009 Author Posted December 23, 2009 Check it out. Obama and Olbermann's rating share a similar profile! Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.