glassgowkiss Posted February 26, 2009 Posted February 26, 2009 first of all i love this name! big wood popping! stimulate this!. My friend had a great idea last night, use 820 billions of dollars to prosecute every home owner, loan officer, real estate agent who committed the fraud. on top of that use the rest to scrub through every no-bid contract on war, through every oil transaction. even more- every quarterly financial statement of every publicly traded company. Quote
pink Posted February 26, 2009 Posted February 26, 2009 (edited) no bob, clearly we should punish the people who are in control of their money.... Edited February 26, 2009 by pink Quote
akhalteke Posted February 26, 2009 Posted February 26, 2009 first of all i love this name! big wood popping! stimulate this!. My friend had a great idea last night, use 820 billions of dollars to prosecute every home owner, loan officer, real estate agent who committed the fraud. on top of that use the rest to scrub through every no-bid contract on war, through every oil transaction. even more- every quarterly financial statement of every publicly traded company. Quote
tvashtarkatena Posted February 26, 2009 Posted February 26, 2009 (edited) We'll have to legalize pot first to clear the court dockets. 100 years from now we may well have made a dent in the project. Edited February 26, 2009 by tvashtarkatena Quote
nigeljmcclung Posted February 26, 2009 Posted February 26, 2009 We'll have to legalize pot first to clear the court dockets. 100 years from now we may well have made a dent in the project. haha agreed. It's funny to see major players from both the Monetarist and Post-Keynesian camp pointing to national decriminalization/legalization as a potential recessionary tool in this crisis. Quote
tvashtarkatena Posted February 26, 2009 Posted February 26, 2009 Funny how seldom such pundits advocate such a policy as a means to right an injustice. Quote
ivan Posted February 26, 2009 Posted February 26, 2009 Funny how seldom such pundits advocate such a policy as a means to right an injustice. remember, the north (or england that matter) didn't outlaw slavery before the civil war b/c they thought it was unjust, they just realized it was cheaper to pay dumbass immigrants slave-wages Quote
pink Posted February 26, 2009 Posted February 26, 2009 Funny how seldom such pundits advocate such a policy as a means to right an injustice. remember, the north (or england that matter) didn't outlaw slavery before the civil war b/c they thought it was unjust, they just realized it was cheaper to pay dumbass immigrants slave-wages who is they? and do u think that u make a slave wage for all the hard work u do? Quote
ivan Posted February 26, 2009 Posted February 26, 2009 who is they? and do u think that u make a slave wage for all the hard work u do? 1. northerners, particularily early northern industrialists 2. no Quote
pink Posted February 26, 2009 Posted February 26, 2009 Funny how seldom such pundits advocate such a policy as a means to right an injustice. remember, the north (or england that matter) didn't outlaw slavery before the civil war b/c they thought it was unjust, they just realized it was cheaper to pay dumbass immigrants slave-wages so aren't we all immigrants to a degree and why didn't the dumbass immigrants make there own way? maybe they were to busy out climbing or something. Quote
tvashtarkatena Posted March 4, 2009 Posted March 4, 2009 Does it count as immigration if one was shat out by a great beast, as we were, Pink? Quote
pink Posted March 4, 2009 Posted March 4, 2009 Does it count as immigration if one was shat out by a great beast, as we were, Pink? women r beastly at times...... Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.