kevbone Posted August 26, 2008 Share Posted August 26, 2008 Anyone been watching? Did you see Ted Kennedy's speach? "Health care is a right, not a privilege" I could not agree more. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peter_Puget Posted August 26, 2008 Share Posted August 26, 2008 While watching check this out. I really like the graph near the bottom: link Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bug Posted August 26, 2008 Share Posted August 26, 2008 Anyone been watching? Did you see Ted Kennedy's speach? "Health care is a right, not a privilege" I could not agree more. I disagree in part with Kennedy's tactics. I beleive we need a safety net but we also need a culture of work. To give millions of people food stamps and rent in exchange for nothing is worse than a taxpayer rip-off, it teaches their children that they do not need to work either. Kennedy is the figurehead for hard left adherance to the welfare program and will be glad to see him depart from the political scene so that PERHAPS more moderate people can lead a change in the structure of welfare and thereby set up a more trustworthy program for health care. YOU CAN'T GET SOMETHING FOR NOTHING. Everyone should work unless they are clearly incapacitated. There should be levels of support, both in welfare and health, depending on how much a person (adult) contributes. I'm not talking about withholding health care to emergency or traumatic needs. But there should be levels of support in terms of 1 on 1 care, number of people per room, etc. We need to reinstil a work ethic across the board. If you get assistance, you work for it. If you don't work, you barely get by and your kids can go to group kitchens to get fed. Harsh? Definately. But not as harsh imo as TEACHING generations to not work and to not have any self respect. Talk about riots. I know. The transition is the most problematic. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kevbone Posted August 26, 2008 Author Share Posted August 26, 2008 I agree that everyone needs to work.....but what does that have to do with healthcare? That is the problem.....you are tying in working with healthcare. They should be separate. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iluka Posted August 26, 2008 Share Posted August 26, 2008 Anyone been watching? Did you see Ted Kennedy's speach? "Health care is a right, not a privilege" I could not agree more. I disagree in part with Kennedy's tactics. I beleive we need a safety net but we also need a culture of work. To give millions of people food stamps and rent in exchange for nothing is worse than a taxpayer rip-off, it teaches their children that they do not need to work either. Kennedy is the figurehead for hard left adherance to the welfare program and will be glad to see him depart from the political scene so that PERHAPS more moderate people can lead a change in the structure of welfare and thereby set up a more trustworthy program for health care. YOU CAN'T GET SOMETHING FOR NOTHING. Everyone should work unless they are clearly incapacitated. There should be levels of support, both in welfare and health, depending on how much a person (adult) contributes. I'm not talking about withholding health care to emergency or traumatic needs. But there should be levels of support in terms of 1 on 1 care, number of people per room, etc. We need to reinstil a work ethic across the board. If you get assistance, you work for it. If you don't work, you barely get by and your kids can go to group kitchens to get fed. Harsh? Definately. But not as harsh imo as TEACHING generations to not work and to not have any self respect. Talk about riots. I know. The transition is the most problematic. And what about all those people who do work hard and don't get insurance coverage through their employers or do receive coverage but have substantial financial obligations (eg. copays, deductibles) themselves or work for themselves and struggle to afford insurance? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jon Posted August 26, 2008 Share Posted August 26, 2008 I can't wait to hear Hillary talk tonight and make us feel sorry for her that she is still stuck with campaign debt. Even a presidential candidate can show people how to live outside their means. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
prole Posted August 26, 2008 Share Posted August 26, 2008 I disagree in part with Kennedy's tactics. I beleive we need a safety net but we also need a culture of work. To give millions of people food stamps and rent in exchange for nothing is worse than a taxpayer rip-off, it teaches their children that they do not need to work either. Kennedy is the figurehead for hard left adherance to the welfare program and will be glad to see him depart from the political scene so that PERHAPS more moderate people can lead a change in the structure of welfare and thereby set up a more trustworthy program for health care. YOU CAN'T GET SOMETHING FOR NOTHING. Everyone should work unless they are clearly incapacitated. There should be levels of support, both in welfare and health, depending on how much a person (adult) contributes. I'm not talking about withholding health care to emergency or traumatic needs. But there should be levels of support in terms of 1 on 1 care, number of people per room, etc. We need to reinstil a work ethic across the board. If you get assistance, you work for it. If you don't work, you barely get by and your kids can go to group kitchens to get fed. Harsh? Definately. But not as harsh imo as TEACHING generations to not work and to not have any self respect. Talk about riots. I know. The transition is the most problematic. Sorry, I'd love to spend more time with this, learning more about your point of view, doing some more research on health-care alternatives for our country, and crafting a thoughtful rebuttal, but I have to go to work! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
akhalteke Posted August 26, 2008 Share Posted August 26, 2008 I agree that everyone needs to work.....but what does that have to do with healthcare? That is the problem.....you are tying in working with healthcare. They should be separate. For the same reasons that your federal retirement portfolio will be depleted before you reach the age of 40. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kevbone Posted August 26, 2008 Author Share Posted August 26, 2008 I have a federal retirement portfolio? Who knew? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZONK Posted August 26, 2008 Share Posted August 26, 2008 People who ride in a car with Ted need health care ! or a Grave site. Hillary is not broke, how much of your tax dollors went to her campain ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dberdinka Posted August 26, 2008 Share Posted August 26, 2008 ..... The transition is the most problematic. Those who don't work already have healthcare coverage through Medicaid. The 40+ million who don't include a great number of individuals who do work but don't get healthcare benefits through their employer and can't afford them out of pocket. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peter_Puget Posted August 26, 2008 Share Posted August 26, 2008 is the lack of a bump itself a different kind of bump? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dberdinka Posted August 26, 2008 Share Posted August 26, 2008 A ditch? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peter_Puget Posted August 26, 2008 Share Posted August 26, 2008 ..... The transition is the most problematic. Those who don't work already have healthcare coverage through Medicaid. The 40+ million who don't include a great number of individuals who do work but don't get healthcare benefits through their employer and can't afford them out of pocket. ya ya ya..... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
prole Posted August 26, 2008 Share Posted August 26, 2008 The 40+ million who don't include a great number of individuals who do work but don't get healthcare benefits through their employer and can't afford them out of pocket. Try it in economics lingo, it sounds less harsh: "These people lack the willingness to pay and are therefore unable to generate effective demand." Either way, the capitalist market in health care doesn't give a fuck. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KaskadskyjKozak Posted August 26, 2008 Share Posted August 26, 2008 ..... The transition is the most problematic. Those who don't work already have healthcare coverage through Medicaid. The 40+ million who don't include a great number of individuals who do work but don't get healthcare benefits through their employer and can't afford them out of pocket. ya ya ya..... exactly. Just about anyone can afford at least to pay for catastrophic insurance. Many of these "uninsured" CHOOSE to be so. But they'll happily have someone else pay for it. F*** socialism. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KaskadskyjKozak Posted August 26, 2008 Share Posted August 26, 2008 The 40+ million who don't include a great number of individuals who do work but don't get healthcare benefits through their employer and can't afford them out of pocket. Try it in economics lingo, it sounds less harsh: "These people lack the willingness to pay and are therefore unable to generate effective demand." Either way, the capitalist market in health care doesn't give a fuck. Also sprecht Unser Marxist. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peter_Puget Posted August 26, 2008 Share Posted August 26, 2008 The 40+ million who don't include a great number of individuals who do work but don't get healthcare benefits through their employer and can't afford them out of pocket. Try it in economics lingo, it sounds less harsh: "These people lack the willingness to pay and are therefore unable to generate effective demand." Either way, the capitalist market in health care doesn't give a fuck. According to the US Census Bureau, 17 million of those without health insurance live in households having over $50,000 in annual income. That's 38% of the uninsured in America. In fact, 9 million - 20% of the uninsured - reside in households pulling down more than $75K a year. Ignorance thy name is prole...... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KaskadskyjKozak Posted August 26, 2008 Share Posted August 26, 2008 The 40+ million who don't include a great number of individuals who do work but don't get healthcare benefits through their employer and can't afford them out of pocket. Try it in economics lingo, it sounds less harsh: "These people lack the willingness to pay and are therefore unable to generate effective demand." Either way, the capitalist market in health care doesn't give a fuck. According to the US Census Bureau, 17 million of those without health insurance live in households having over $50,000 in annual income. That's 38% of the uninsured in America. In fact, 9 million - 20% of the uninsured - reside in households pulling down more than $75K a year. Ignorance thy name is prole...... WORKERS OF THE WORLD UNITE! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peter_Puget Posted August 26, 2008 Share Posted August 26, 2008 Worker? LOL I am sure he is in middle school somewhere and doesn't work at all. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KaskadskyjKozak Posted August 26, 2008 Share Posted August 26, 2008 Worker? LOL I am sure he is in middle school somewhere and doesn't work at all. I'm sure WWU has a chapter of the Komsomol to which Prole is active member, you bourgeousie capitalist pig! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
prole Posted August 26, 2008 Share Posted August 26, 2008 Whoo, everybody sure is touchy! Such reflexive defensiveness is a sure sign that things aren't going so well for you guys. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tvashtarkatena Posted August 26, 2008 Share Posted August 26, 2008 The 40+ million who don't include a great number of individuals who do work but don't get healthcare benefits through their employer and can't afford them out of pocket. Try it in economics lingo, it sounds less harsh: "These people lack the willingness to pay and are therefore unable to generate effective demand." Either way, the capitalist market in health care doesn't give a fuck. According to the US Census Bureau, 17 million of those without health insurance live in households having over $50,000 in annual income. That's 38% of the uninsured in America. In fact, 9 million - 20% of the uninsured - reside in households pulling down more than $75K a year. Ignorance thy name is prole...... So, what you're saying is that the majority of folks who don't have healthcare can't afford it, so we don't have a problem. Thanks for the clarification. You really got Prole this time. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peter_Puget Posted August 26, 2008 Share Posted August 26, 2008 LOL I can already taste the sandwich and beer Jim will be buying me in just a few short months. I'll have my sister send up her old John McCain POW bracelet for him to wear while we dine. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tvashtarkatena Posted August 26, 2008 Share Posted August 26, 2008 Only a fool confidently predicts the future, but then again, your position is secure without them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.