Jump to content

Idiocracy


prole

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 131
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

To say nothing of the positive or negative aspects of living in American culture, one thing that is overwhelmingly telling about American culture is the pervasively ignorant attitude that living in any other country would be absolutely miserable by comparison to living here; moreover, that the subjects in those countries either a) Are miserable and wished they lived here, or b) if they profess to be content in their lives, they are just blissfully ignorant of what they are missing by not living here. Anyone who has traveled much, and while doing so has paid the slightest interest to the lives of the people they've encountered, can not possibly hold such a view as binding and all encompassing.

 

No one can deny that the standard of living and opportunies that exist in the US are generous by any measure. Yet I sympathize heavily with what Prole is driving at, which is that the standard of living here is also producing a lazy, bored, distracted culture that has lost the ability to distinguish between need and want, and which also has no real appreciation of the standard of living and opportunities it enjoys, because it's gotten to where "suffering" in this culture means you can't afford to upgrade your ipod to the 160GB model instead of the Nano. You can trumpet the positivity of free market capitalism all you want, but it doesn't change the fact that the hyper-consumerist culture it has produced here is one that is shallow, escapist, distracted, and self-absorbed.

 

And you wonder why "family values" have faded?

 

Again - who gets the blame for this? There are only so many capitalist titans in our society, their wants are limited, and their aggregate demand for goods and services are quite limited relative to that generated by the average worker. To cap the irony, most of them have made their fortunes by catering to the wants and desires of the NASCAR or McMansion sets more efficiently than any other participant in the marketplace.

 

You can blame them for the gaudy fixtures in their Hamptons beach retreat, but not the Velvet Elvis poster above the Lazy-Boy recliner anchored in front of the flat-screen showing the latest UFC fight.

 

 

So is my description of the culture accurate- bored, distracted, self-absorbed? Or I am totally off base?

 

Would it be fair to say those providing the goods and services, and those consuming them, are both really doing the same thing- immersing themselves in desire and acquisition?

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

I should also add that you will probably enjoy David Foster Wallace's "Infinite Jest," which is a long and hilarious meditation on the anxieties that you expressed in your post.

 

I read the book 10 years ago, and it seems kind of prophetic in hindsight.

 

I guess my main observation would be that if American culture ever manages to move beyond "ME" , while retaining all it's social freedoms and opportunities- then that would be something entirely new. You could say the same of all cultures in fact.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Relying on a tissue-thin argument that “we’re just giving people what they want” is simply ludicrous. That the “masses” generate demand is true, but only when you define demand in the abstract. No one is born with an innate desire for nascar, kiwi-flavored tequila, blackberrys, oxygenated bottled water, lip implants, or truck nutz. The market is not meeting needs and human beings are not growing new ones. To suggest that people are demanding the vast array of rubbish on the market obfuscates the very real and very huge apparatus (billions of dollars) devoted to marketing, advertising, R&D, media synergistics etc. that represents a majority of the intellectual production in this country. The notion that people “just want these things” is pure faith-based nonsense and suggests a much grimmer view of human nature than I would ever put forth. That the educational, cultural, and spiritual potentialities of working class people cannot and should not be nurtured by working people represents a retreat from humanism and enlightenment values.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Relying on a tissue-thin argument that “we’re just giving people what they want” is simply ludicrous. That the “masses” generate demand is true, but only when you define demand in the abstract. No one is born with an innate desire for stoppers, tri-cams, hexes, C4's, ice-screws, GPS's, ice tools, pickets, gore-tex shell jackets, 4-season tents, 60 m ropes,...
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




×
×
  • Create New...