Jump to content
  • Announcements

    • olyclimber

      WELCOME TO THE CASCADECLIMBERS.COM FORUMS   02/03/18

      We have upgraded to new forum software as of late last year, and it makes everything here so much better!  It is now much easier to do pretty much anything, including write Trip Reports, sell gear, schedule climbing related events, and more. There is a new reputation system that allows for positive contributors to be recognized,  it is possible to tag content with identifiers, drag and drop in images, and it is much easier to embed multimedia content from Youtube, Vimeo, and more.  In all, the site is much more user friendly, bug free, and feature rich!   Whether you're a new user or a grizzled cascadeclimbers.com veteran, we think you'll love the new forums. Enjoy!
Sign in to follow this  
KaskadskyjKozak

Dems get Ugly

Recommended Posts

"Obama said he would have voted against the measure but didn't because he was campaigning in New Hampshire at the time. He said it was impossible to know when votes will be scheduled in the Senate. "This is a problem" related to running for president, he said"

 

 

 

So……did he vote for it? Not sure how to read this.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
"Obama said he would have voted against the measure but didn't because he was campaigning in New Hampshire at the time. He said it was impossible to know when votes will be scheduled in the Senate. "This is a problem" related to running for president, he said"

 

 

 

So……did he vote for it? Not sure how to read this.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

RTFA. "He would have voted against it" means he didn't vote. Habla anglais, mon amis?

 

What about "impossible to know when votes will be scheduled in the Senate"? A U. S. Senator in the 21st century does not know when a vote is coming up? What, do they pull them out of their ass on the spur of the moment? He has staff in D.C., right? And they all own cell phones, right? The statement that it's "impossible to know when votes will be scheduled" sounds like something only an asshat would say.

 

I have a recollection of reading somewhere that Obama has one of the highest absenteeism rates in the Senate, has been present to vote only 30% of the time or some such figure. (not sure if that stat is accurate)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It states it quite clearly. He would have voted against it but DIDN'T because he wasn't physically there to cast his vote.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
"Obama said he would have voted against the measure but didn't because he was campaigning in New Hampshire at the time. He said it was impossible to know when votes will be scheduled in the Senate. "This is a problem" related to running for president, he said"

 

 

 

So……did he vote for it? Not sure how to read this.

 

 

U.S. Senate Roll Call Votes 110th Congress - 1st Session

 

Vote Summary

 

Question: On the Amendment (Feingold Amdt. No. 3164 )

Vote Number: 362

Vote Date: October 3, 2007, 02:00 PM

Required For Majority: 3/5

Vote Result: Amendment Rejected

Amendment Number: S.Amdt. 3164 to H.R. 3222 (Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2008)

Statement of Purpose: To safely redeploy United States troops from Iraq.

Vote Counts: YEAs 28

NAYs 68

Not Voting 4

 

Grouped By Vote Position YEAs ---28

Akaka (D-HI)

Biden (D-DE)

Boxer (D-CA)

Brown (D-OH)

Byrd (D-WV)

Cantwell (D-WA)

Cardin (D-MD)

Clinton (D-NY)

Dodd (D-CT)

Durbin (D-IL)

Feingold (D-WI)

Feinstein (D-CA)

Harkin (D-IA)

Kennedy (D-MA)

Kerry (D-MA)

Klobuchar (D-MN)

Kohl (D-WI)

Lautenberg (D-NJ)

Leahy (D-VT)

Menendez (D-NJ)

Murray (D-WA)

Reid (D-NV)

Rockefeller (D-WV)

Sanders (I-VT)

Schumer (D-NY)

Stabenow (D-MI)

Whitehouse (D-RI)

Wyden (D-OR)

 

NAYs ---68

Alexander (R-TN)

Allard (R-CO)

Barrasso (R-WY)

Baucus (D-MT)

Bayh (D-IN)

Bennett (R-UT)

Bingaman (D-NM)

Bond (R-MO)

Brownback (R-KS)

Bunning (R-KY)

Burr (R-NC)

Carper (D-DE)

Casey (D-PA)

Chambliss (R-GA)

Coburn (R-OK)

Cochran (R-MS)

Coleman (R-MN)

Collins (R-ME)

Conrad (D-ND)

Corker (R-TN)

Cornyn (R-TX)

Craig (R-ID)

Crapo (R-ID)

DeMint (R-SC)

Dole (R-NC)

Domenici (R-NM)

Dorgan (D-ND)

Ensign (R-NV)

Enzi (R-WY)

Graham (R-SC)

Grassley (R-IA)

Gregg (R-NH)

Hagel (R-NE)

Hatch (R-UT)

Hutchison (R-TX)

Inhofe (R-OK)

Inouye (D-HI)

Isakson (R-GA)

Johnson (D-SD)

Kyl (R-AZ)

Landrieu (D-LA)

Levin (D-MI)

Lieberman (ID-CT)

Lincoln (D-AR)

Lott (R-MS)

Lugar (R-IN)

Martinez (R-FL)

McCaskill (D-MO)

McConnell (R-KY)

Mikulski (D-MD)

Murkowski (R-AK)

Nelson (D-FL)

Nelson (D-NE)

Pryor (D-AR)

Reed (D-RI)

Roberts (R-KS)

Salazar (D-CO)

Sessions (R-AL)

Shelby (R-AL)

Smith (R-OR)

Snowe (R-ME)

Stevens (R-AK)

Sununu (R-NH)

Tester (D-MT)

Thune (R-SD)

Vitter (R-LA)

Voinovich (R-OH)

Webb (D-VA)

 

Not Voting - 4

McCain (R-AZ)

Obama (D-IL)

Specter (R-PA)

Warner (R-VA)

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

These non-binding resolutions are a waste of time anyway. They can condemn Move On, Rush Limbaugh, Burma, Sudan and declare french fries be called freedom fries. Its all CYA moves on both sides. Its like declaring that you dont like the brand of tires on the car thats running you over. I'd have to agree that was a lame fucking excuse by Obama(shows poor organiztional skills if he cant get to what he believes is an important vote.) But your fooling yourself to think that inept behavior is isolated to the Democratic side of things.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
These non-binding resolutions are a waste of time anyway. They can condemn Move On, Rush Limbaugh, Burma, Sudan and declare french fries be called freedom fries. Its all CYA moves on both sides. Its like declaring that you dont like the brand of tires on the car thats running you over. I'd have to agree that was a lame fucking excuse by Obama(shows poor organiztional skills if he cant get to what he believes is an important vote.) But your fooling yourself to think that inept behavior is isolated to the Democratic side of things.

 

inept, or done on purpose?

 

this way he doesn't actually vote against it, but would...so he says

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Clinton is the strategy guru. Obama hasn't figured out how to disagree with the current foreign policy enough to satiate those wanting change without being characterized as "inexperienced." She'll take the nom.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Come on KKK, I know you don't like George W. that much, but at least he actually got a majority of the votes last time.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Come on KKK, I know you don't like George W. that much, but at least he actually got a majority of the votes last time.

 

we're talking about Obamalamadingdang, aren't we? :wazup:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Sign in to follow this  

×