Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Trip: Mt Deception - Northeast Chute

 

Date: 4/15/2007

 

Trip Report:

Deception.jpg

Mt Deception: We skied the obvious chute that joins the summit ridge on looker's right. Phil stands in the distance next to the trees.

 

As our newfound interest in the Olympic Mountains blooms across the Puget Sound in the metropoles, it is nice for little worker bees to harvest some nectar now and then. Instead of crabbing about previous misfortunes, I clawed for my next opportunity to explore above the Dungeness River. "Olympic Peninsula" may trigger images of lush rainforests and terrible weather in the minds of most, but the peninsula hosts enough mountains to create a rainshadow, too. Sequim's paltry annual average of 16.1 inches of rain is signifantly less than Leavenworth's 25. Phil and I left Seattle in the wee hours of the morning for a circuitous drive over Tacoma Narrows, north to Sequim, then south above the Dungeness.

 

The weather was beautiful. We donned our packs with glee, ecstatic for the eight-mile hike to Royal Basin. The gorgeous moss-carpeted old-growth forest along the Dungeness reminds me of similar sylvan scenery along Fisher Creek in the North Cascades.

 

Royal Basin had a consistent snowpack. Navigation to the head of the basin took a few redirects due to a gauntlet of benches, moraines, and minidrainages. Our first views of Deception were delightful; its snowpack was fat. We were also delighted to ogle myriad magnificent terrain with all aspects available at the head of the basin.

 

Approached.jpg

Looking down the valley from just below Royal Basin

 

RoyalBasinSmall.jpg

Phil boots toward the head of the basin.

 

Dust over crust in the basin became boot-top blower on our route, the northeast chute. What is this? Light, fluffy powder on the Olympic Peninsula in the middle of April!? As giddy as school boys we booted up the route as quickly as our approach-taxed legs could kick. There was an icy spot where the route became more steep and exposed, then a steep section at the top of the chute. The ridge to the summit held copious snow.

 

Climb1Small.jpg

Phil dons crampons.

 

Climb2Small.jpg

Phil climbs to the top. He measured the slope where he is at 50 degrees with one of those little LifeLink gadgets.

 

The views were fleeting. Clouds were building from the west. Any disappointment was amply stifled by a successful summit and lovely line to ski. I've been expending big efforts with little success lately. Phil was expressing similar sentiments that prompted me to respond, "Let's get the descent under our belts before we celebrate too much."

 

SummitSmall.jpg

Ready to ski

 

A quick schuss down the ridge put us at the notch. Phil peered over it first. I joined him, noting that I didn't like the way the powdery inch on top uniformly slid from under the skis. I took a turn and my feelings about it didn't change. I wasn't concerned so much about avalanches as the slightly unpredictable snow suface. I sidestepped the first bit until I felt better about the snow, then made some steep turns on lovely edge-holding chalky snow. Phil followed.

 

And on my first ski descent from a summit in the Olympics, Zeus said, "Let there be powder!"

 

Phil likes powder...

Ski1Small.jpg

Ski2Small.jpg

Ski3Small.jpg

Ski4Small.jpg

SkySki.jpg

...and I do, too. (Last photo by Phil)

 

We returned on the ferry, but my mind is still floating in the clouds, tangled in a web of Deceit. Saltwater-rainforests-sunshine-April-POWDER??? :rawk:

 

Gear Notes:

Just crampons and an ice ax. Didn't use the skins.

 

Approach Notes:

Boat/Bridge->Highway->Dirt road->Trail->Royal Basin

  • Replies 13
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

Soudns like a great trip Sky. Looks like I chose poorly. Ended up with an horrendous approach to unpleasant snow on Canon mtn couloir. Talk about big efforts with disproportionate rewards! Live and learn I guess. Anyway, I'm glad you guys had a good time...

Posted

My first reaction to this view was that the line directly to the summit might be a good ski descent.

FirstDSmall.jpg

 

Looking in my 1979 version of the OMR Guide, it appears that the route we skied is called the Honeymoon Route and was first climbed by a pair with the same last name. Is this a married couple that climbed it during their honeymoon? Anyone?

Posted

After further consultation, maybe we did what the guide calls the NE Face, #5. Anyway, it's easy to tell in the picture: the obvious chute left of the tower and right of the summit. Those little sketches look cool, but I don't find them all that informative.

 

Oh yeah: Cool picture for comparison, Oly.

Posted

 

Looking in my 1979 version of the OMR Guide, it appears that the route we skied is called the Honeymoon Route and was first climbed by a pair with the same last name. Is this a married couple that climbed it during their honeymoon? Anyone?

 

http://www.alpenglow.org/ski-history/notes/comm/firey-joe.html

 

well, even if you didn't ski that route, maybe Lowell would know...see the references to the Bloomers in this article. yeah...i know, maybe it isn't that interesting to know... :toad:

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




×
×
  • Create New...