Jump to content

Pro vs. Amateur climbers


wayne

Recommended Posts

I see more rifts developing now with the House thing and all. Are natural anti-establish folk such as ourselves rebeling?

I believe there is a place for $ in this sport. Hell if I were 20 years younger, I might chase it.

Maybe its too counter culture of an interest here.In europe it is a major sports draw.

"The true spirit of the sport lies in the exploits of the amateur climber", The late Mike Bearzi.

Discuss

Edited by wayne1112
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 17
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Interesting stuff.

Begs the question "do you have to be sponsored or involved in climbing as a "profession" to be a professional?

Some of the best climbers have never recieved sponsorship, been paid a dime, or possibly even reported their achievements.

Does that disqualify?

Or do you just have to not gape on the rock?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good post and good food for thought.

Sadly many "sponsored" climber's compsensation is just 6-7 pairs of free shoes a year.

 

Down at the UW wall one afternoon, many years ago, a fellow was claiming to be a sponsored climber and wanted to know if my buddies and I would enjoy some free Power Bar stickers. Brian Sullivan, a NW ski-mountaineering bad ass, just started laughing and walked away.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think that once you start getting paid for doing something you can't help but start doing it for different reasons. We all climb for own reasons but for most of us getting paid or free shoes is not one of them, we're going to have a little less in common with those who do. We can climb to please ourselves instead of our sponsors. We don't have to keep doing harder and harder stuff to maintain our marketability. I really hope those peeps can keep climbing fresh and not become a job but I doubt they can in the long run.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nice topic. In order to climb at the level "professional" climbers are achieving, it is necessary to turn it into a business at some level. This could be through sponsorships, guiding, photography, or some other venture, but the climbing will have to put food on the table. The marketing of euro climbing is overdone and I am thankful the sport hasnt reached that level of popularity here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This differentiation occurs in most activities. Name the activity, and if it's popular, somebody's probably being paid to perform it.

 

In most of those paid activities, there are those that perform only for the bucks and possible fame and those that perform because they love the activity... and would continue to perform after the bucks stop flowing.

 

As to the question of those that deserve to be paid to perform the activity, this also cuts across most lines. Take the music industry, how often do we shake our heads and marvel at the tossers that are promoted and making bank while those whose talent dwarves the tossers' continue in relative obscurity and are paid in scraps from the table?

 

nothing new; Life counters our notions of Fair uninterrupted.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The problem with sponsorship is that it doesn't really pay the bills. There are a lot of sponsored climbers...Wayne could probably become one with his resume over the last few years. The problem is that most sponsored climbers don't make much money. Most get some gear here and there and maybe some support on expeditions.

 

We all know the sponsored athletes who make a bit more. Steve House, Tommy Caldwell and Beth Rodden, Ed Viesters...the A list of climbing.

 

Jason

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I see more rifts developing now with the House thing and all. Are natural anti-establish folk such as ourselves rebeling?

I believe there is a place for $ in this sport. Hell if I were 20 years younger, I might chase it.

Maybe its too counter culture of an interest here.In europe it is a major sports draw.

"The true spirit of the sport lies in the exploits of the amateur climber", The late Mike Bearzi.

Discuss

I think the money's being made. wink.gif

From Publishers Weekly

When nonconformity has become not only cool but also consumable, and everyone is told they are special, what happens to our definitions of rebellion and individualism? Are our real rebels against "conformist nonconformity" now the "neo-traditionalists" who exchange their individualism for membership in a community that offers meaning in backward-looking ideologies? ... Copyright © Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

yellaf.gif
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It seems to me the bigger question being asked is "Should climbers be reimbursed for their accomplishments?" This opens up a whole other can of worms that I really don't feel like getting into right now.

 

Interesting stuff.

Begs the question "do you have to be sponsored or involved in climbing as a "profession" to be a professional?

 

Mos is more on the track that I'm into. What do we all consider as professional? Is it basically makin' money or is it pursuing a passion or obsession to the best of your ability? Traditionally the idea is that of one whom generates income for their "craft". If you're true to yourself and answer to nobody else, then you're a professional. Unfortunately there aren't very many people that can honestly say that about themselves. It's all relative.

bigdrink.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




×
×
  • Create New...