olyclimber Posted October 19, 2006 Posted October 19, 2006 You should enjoy this article Fairweather http://www.newscientist.com/channel/earth/mg19225731.100-imagine-earth-without-people.html Quote
cj001f Posted October 19, 2006 Posted October 19, 2006 you never send me flowers anymore Olyclimber Quote
olyclimber Posted October 19, 2006 Author Posted October 19, 2006 here's a bouquet for you little buddy: Quote
cj001f Posted October 19, 2006 Posted October 19, 2006 here's a bouquet for you little buddy: there's no need to be an olymprick! Quote
catbirdseat Posted October 19, 2006 Posted October 19, 2006 That's akin to navel contemplation. A stimulating intellectual exercise, but not a productive use of one's time. Quote
olyclimber Posted October 19, 2006 Author Posted October 19, 2006 you have apparently never contemplated the right navel CBS. but we already knew that. Quote
catbirdseat Posted October 19, 2006 Posted October 19, 2006 you have apparently never contemplated the right navel CBS. but we already knew that. I refer you to the knottygirl thread... Quote
Mr_Phil Posted October 19, 2006 Posted October 19, 2006 you have apparently never contemplated the right navel CBS. but we already knew that. I refer you to the knottygirl thread... The correct answer is: Quote
tvashtarkatena Posted October 19, 2006 Posted October 19, 2006 You should enjoy this article Fairweather http://www.newscientist.com/channel/earth/mg19225731.100-imagine-earth-without-people.html ...und zee ratio of liberals to our kind would have to be, I zink, 100 to 1... Quote
Fairweather Posted October 20, 2006 Posted October 20, 2006 Interesting article. I've often wondered the same questions that are posed and partially answered in the piece. The article seems to make the all-too-common assumption that humans are apart from nature. Creationism put aside - as it must be for a discussion like this - we humans are either wholly part of the evolution of this planet, or not. I don't doubt that if you remove one species from the web others will thrive. And I'm not trying to suggest we can't or shouldn't try our best to minimize our impact on this natural world of which we're a part. I'm not, however, in any hurry to go quietly into the night. Quote
G-spotter Posted October 20, 2006 Posted October 20, 2006 If a tree falls in a silent forest and kills a does it make a sound? Quote
pope Posted October 20, 2006 Posted October 20, 2006 If a tree falls in a silent forest and kills a does it make a sound? Exactly. When we're gone, what species will be intelligent enough to articulate its appreciation for the inherent value of Earth's ecological systems? Anyway, I can't see humans disappearing. I can see our population growing exponentially until we reach about half of the planet's carrying capacity, followed by a diminishing rate of increase, like any other population subject to logistic growth. Quote
JayB Posted October 20, 2006 Posted October 20, 2006 Maybe even a decrease if the predictions about Japan and Euroland are correct. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.