Camilo Posted December 2, 2004 Posted December 2, 2004 I'm thinking about getting some fat skis and am wondering if my Scarpa Lasers will be too low to use for this. Has anybody used Lasers with a fat ski like a Salomon Pocket Rocket? I figure they'll be fine in deep stuff but how about crud? Quote
cj001f Posted December 2, 2004 Posted December 2, 2004 I use Lasers w/ Crossbows (187cm). They're more than fine. Quote
thelawgoddess Posted December 2, 2004 Posted December 2, 2004 maybe you need some of THIS action? Quote
bDubyaH Posted December 2, 2004 Posted December 2, 2004 Has anybody used Lasers with a fat ski like a Salomon Pocket Rocket? I figure they'll be fine in deep stuff but how about crud? Â my friend rides this exact setup. works fine Quote
Camilo Posted December 2, 2004 Author Posted December 2, 2004 Thanks for the info. Still deciding whether or not to spend the money. . . Quote
timplace Posted December 2, 2004 Posted December 2, 2004 I have several friends that use that combination. It works fine, but they all use their downhill boots in area for more control. They are "crasher" skiers rather than finesse skiers, so it depends a bit on your skiing style. I use Lasers with low, light thermofit liners on Jak BC's -- same dimensions as Pocket Rockets -- and actually prefer the lighter boots to my downhill boots. I turn a whole lot more than my buds. Quote
thelawgoddess Posted December 2, 2004 Posted December 2, 2004 They are "crasher" skiers rather than finesse skiers, so it depends a bit on your skiing style. i think they would prefer to be called "power" skiers. the ones i know don't actually crash much. Quote
gapertimmy Posted December 2, 2004 Posted December 2, 2004 pocket rockets... a fat ski? Â how much weight savings does one get with the laser vs say the denali anyways? Quote
cj001f Posted December 2, 2004 Posted December 2, 2004 how much weight savings does one get with the laser vs say the denali anyways? It's minimal weight savings; even the F1 isn't that much lighter. You do get to use Dynafits, and Dynafits Quote
cracked Posted December 3, 2004 Posted December 3, 2004 I wish they made a Denali with dyafit fittings. Â Hey Scarpa: Quote
Gaper_Jeffy Posted December 3, 2004 Posted December 3, 2004 I wish they made an Andrelain with dynafit fittings. Â Hey Garmont: Â Â (I actually [seriously] emailed Garmont to ask if they would--they said no) Quote
Figger_Eight Posted December 3, 2004 Posted December 3, 2004 I wish they made an Andrelain with dynafit fittings. Â Hey Garmont: Â Â (I actually [seriously] emailed Garmont to ask if they would--they said no) Â I guess that makes sense to match the heaviest, burliest AT boot with the lightest, weakest binding. Quote
cj001f Posted December 3, 2004 Posted December 3, 2004 lightest, weakest binding. lightest, yes weakest, no  There seem to be a number of Euro skimountaineers/tourers who mount Dynafits on fat/burly boards - they obviously like them. Now if they'd just make a brake to fit  Ask Garmont to drop their prices 10%. $630 Quote
Gaper_Jeffy Posted December 3, 2004 Posted December 3, 2004 I guess that makes sense to match the heaviest, burliest AT boot with the lightest, weakest binding. What is your factual basis for believing they are the "weakest binding"? Quote
Gaper_Jeffy Posted December 3, 2004 Posted December 3, 2004 (I just included that icon cause I thought it was cool, no pun intended) Quote
AlpineK Posted December 3, 2004 Posted December 3, 2004 I guess that makes sense to match the heaviest, burliest AT boot with the lightest, weakest binding. What is your factual basis for believing they are the "weakest binding"? Â No doubt. Just how is it you figure dynafit is the weakest binding. Quote
iain Posted December 3, 2004 Posted December 3, 2004 I would hope (I have not used lasers) that the plastic is less stiff in the laser than the denali for touring's sake. The denali xt was really stiff for an AT boot, and the newer one is even stiffer! Don't they have to tack on a dynafit tax to any boot that gets the fittings? like $100 or something, I've heard. Quote
cj001f Posted December 3, 2004 Posted December 3, 2004 I would hope (I have not used lasers) that the plastic is less stiff in the laser than the denali for touring's sake. It's supposed to be less stiff; how much so seems to vary person to person. But then, I've heard all kinds of relative stiffness comparison between boots. Megarides are stiffer than Denalis, no they aren't Adrenalins are stiff, no they aren't Quote
graupel Posted December 3, 2004 Posted December 3, 2004 Yes, it costs about $100 at retail to have Dynafit fittings on a boot from a company like Garmont. Garmont actually takes it in the shorts on the Megaride a little in an effort to keep the price from climbing too high. Â I'm sure their rationale for the non Dynafit components on the Adrenalin is that they believe someone choosing this beefy of a boot is probably going to go for a Naxo, Freeride, or if they are looking for lighter, the Silveretta Pure. I think this is a reasonable assumption. Beefy boot skiers tend to like higher DIN settings, but more importantly, they are used to performance alpine gear and would likely prefer something that resembles it in step-in and release functions for their backcountry kit. Â From a practical perspective, they would sell more numbers on a less expensive Adrenalin than a more expensive model (as a Dynafit compatible one would be). If there gets to be more buyers of this sort of thing, it might open up options that wouldn't otherwise make sense. Quote
cj001f Posted December 3, 2004 Posted December 3, 2004 Garmont actually takes it in the shorts on the Megaride a little in an effort to keep the price from climbing too high. Substitute "Garmont North America" for "Garmont". Even with the Euro 50% higher than it was 2 years ago you can buy a brandnew 04-05 Megaride online, delivered from Europe for $415. That's $180 less than US retail. You can get Adrenalin's delivered from Europe for $395. That's $240 less than US retail. That's not tariffs or other taxes, that's the markup for the worthless North American distributorships Quote
cracked Posted December 3, 2004 Posted December 3, 2004 Either way, there are no dynafit compatible Adrenalines or Denali TTs. Quote
cj001f Posted December 3, 2004 Posted December 3, 2004 Either way, there are no dynafit compatible Adrenalines or Denali TTs. There's a least one pair of Denali's out there. It's nothing a dremel tool, epoxy, some fittings, and some help from Lou can't change http://wildsnow.com/articles/denali_dynafit_retrofit/denali_dynafit_retrofit.html Quote
Gaper_Jeffy Posted December 3, 2004 Posted December 3, 2004 You can get Adrenalin's delivered from Europe for $395. That's $240 less than US retail. Where the heck you shopping Carl? Mine were ~$485 and since the dollars recent weaking in the past few weeks they are now like $510. Quote
Figger_Eight Posted December 3, 2004 Posted December 3, 2004 I guess that makes sense to match the heaviest, burliest AT boot with the lightest, weakest binding. What is your factual basis for believing they are the "weakest binding"?  No doubt. Just how is it you figure dynafit is the weakest binding.  I knew some of you wouldn't like that one  Since the toe and the heel pieces aren't one unit, a softer flexing ski or a big impact can pre-release a boot - not to mention lower din settings than a Freeride or Naxo. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.