iain Posted May 28, 2004 Posted May 28, 2004 "Let me tell you what else I'm worried about: I'm worried about an opponent who uses nation building and the military in the same sentence." -GWB back in 2000 priceless. Quote
DPS Posted May 28, 2004 Posted May 28, 2004 Uh, dps, a Democratic President sent us to Nam, a Democratic President escalated the war there (meanwhile trying to convince the American people that he was doing just the opposite), but a Republican was in office when we finally got out. So, you might be slightly mistaken. You are confusing liberal with democrat. Ending the war in Viet Nam was always a liberal idea. Starting and continuing the war was a conservative, pro business (oil, tin, rubber) idea. Quote
chucK Posted May 28, 2004 Posted May 28, 2004 Speaking of LBJ, I got a great idea for Bush, the Republican party, our Nation, and the World. Total win win win win situation. Like LBJ, Bush outa announce he will not seek reelection because of his LBJ-in-Vietnam-like debacle. The republicans quickly tap McCain, who even with a write-in vote would trash Kerry by a landslide. Bush got what he wanted done (revenged his Dad) and gets out of the limelight before he is thoroughly discredited and disgraced. The GOP retains hold the presidency (the pro-lifers will rejoice). Our nation and the world benefit by having a reasonable administration in office which is infinitely more likely to steer us out of the storm into which BushCo has dumped us. Great idea, no? Quote
Greg_W Posted May 28, 2004 Posted May 28, 2004 Actually, starting and continuing the war was based on Harry S. Truman's pledge to be the "anti-Communist Policeman to the World." And, since the advent of the Kennedy family (heretofore known as "the global family of Satan's spawn") in politics "liberal" has been synonymous with "Democrat." Quote
lummox Posted May 28, 2004 Posted May 28, 2004 full text: http://www.salon.com/opinion/feature/2004/05/26/gore_speech/index.html Quote
slothrop Posted May 28, 2004 Posted May 28, 2004 Like LBJ, Bush outa announce he will not seek reelection because of his LBJ-in-Vietnam-like debacle. The republicans quickly tap McCain, who even with a write-in vote would trash Kerry by a landslide. Never happen, but it's a fine idea. I might even vote for McCain. Quote
klenke Posted May 28, 2004 Posted May 28, 2004 In today's Seattle Times. Reenactment courtesy of Devericks: Quote
JoshK Posted May 28, 2004 Posted May 28, 2004 Ironically, you could practically consider Nixon "liberal" compared to the trash the republican party has become. Quote
cracked Posted May 28, 2004 Posted May 28, 2004 Such anger, such hatred. Josh, are you bummed about the weather? Quote
JoshK Posted May 28, 2004 Posted May 28, 2004 In today's Seattle Times. Reenactment courtesy of Devericks: 5 points for whoever can identify what the "YEEAAHHGG!!!" is in reference to. Quote
chucK Posted May 28, 2004 Posted May 28, 2004 Offer a free drink and Klenke'll explain whatever you want to hear Quote
klenke Posted May 28, 2004 Posted May 28, 2004 Offer a free drink and Klenke'll explain whatever you want to hear Huh? Don't reveal to us your dreams, chucK. Quote
Fairweather Posted May 29, 2004 Posted May 29, 2004 In today's Seattle Times. Reenactment courtesy of Devericks: 5 points for whoever can identify what the "YEEAAHHGG!!!" is in reference to. Notice also, Mr Dean's attire! Quote
marylou Posted May 29, 2004 Posted May 29, 2004 Ironically, you could practically consider Nixon "liberal" compared to the trash the republican party has become. I'd laugh, but it's actually true! Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.