EWolfe Posted December 13, 2003 Share Posted December 13, 2003 cracked said: Cpt.Caveman said: cracked said: Cpt.Caveman said: MisterE said: Cpt.Caveman said: Alex said: cracked said: MisterE said: badvoodoo said: Muffy_The_Wanker_Sprayer said: cracked said: snoboy said: scott_harpell said: cracked said: snoboy said: arlen said: Is posting incoherently while drunk a bannable offense now? Always was, just ask Scott_Harpell. Damn right! wow paul. how creative. changing the names, to make it look like someone ripping on you was actaully ripping on someone else. sure aren't wasting your edumacation. Guess what Scott? I was thinking of Fence Sitter when I wrote that post. I just got the names a little mixed up. They all blur together sometimes... Don't worry Scotty, I'm putting my edumacation to good use! ya, umm that s obvious At what point does a massively recursive quoted thread collapse under its own weight? "12 buried and presumed lost in spray collapse. 'Well, that's 12 less of those fuckers to ban,' say moderators." I don't know, lets find out... Posers! All of ya! Dear god thats alot of quoted people! Huh? I think Arlen's original quote will just disappear soon. arlen?? This might be interesting... Eat it Ask Panama.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cpt.Caveman Posted December 13, 2003 Author Share Posted December 13, 2003 MisterE said: cracked said: Cpt.Caveman said: cracked said: Cpt.Caveman said: MisterE said: Cpt.Caveman said: Alex said: cracked said: MisterE said: badvoodoo said: Muffy_The_Wanker_Sprayer said: cracked said: snoboy said: scott_harpell said: cracked said: snoboy said: arlen said: Is posting incoherently while drunk a bannable offense now? Always was, just ask Scott_Harpell. Damn right! wow paul. how creative. changing the names, to make it look like someone ripping on you was actaully ripping on someone else. sure aren't wasting your edumacation. Guess what Scott? I was thinking of Fence Sitter when I wrote that post. I just got the names a little mixed up. They all blur together sometimes... Don't worry Scotty, I'm putting my edumacation to good use! ya, umm that s obvious At what point does a massively recursive quoted thread collapse under its own weight? "12 buried and presumed lost in spray collapse. 'Well, that's 12 less of those fuckers to ban,' say moderators." I don't know, lets find out... Posers! All of ya! Dear god thats alot of quoted people! Huh? I think Arlen's original quote will just disappear soon. arlen?? This might be interesting... Eat it Ask Panama.... yo mamma werks fine Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ScottP Posted December 13, 2003 Share Posted December 13, 2003 sisu_suomi said: Sometimes this site sucks.Banning is like going thru the library and removing certain books. In retrospect, perhaps some books ought to be pulled and tossed; those that are particularly vile. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cpt.Caveman Posted December 13, 2003 Author Share Posted December 13, 2003 A good read to try and understand where the "movement" was coming from. Educationally a nice piece of work for the right person and not EVER worth banning. In fact your suggestion to ban that book agrees in some part with the reading in it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ScottP Posted December 13, 2003 Share Posted December 13, 2003 That's why the "in retrospect" qualifier... The point is arguably a good one for the time, but he really fucked up along the way. In light of where it all went, let's just say it shouldn't be required reading. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cpt.Caveman Posted December 13, 2003 Author Share Posted December 13, 2003 I disagree with the required reading. I think that it is required to learn the history and educate ourselves. I dont think it is required by every person though.. Only to those that understand..... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lI1|1! Posted December 13, 2003 Share Posted December 13, 2003 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cpt.Caveman Posted December 13, 2003 Author Share Posted December 13, 2003 Fuckin a that is hilarious Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scratchandsniff Posted December 13, 2003 Share Posted December 13, 2003 I read all the posts and don't really know what happened except caveman got banned for 3 min. ...evidently. Did you show your penis again? Then it was decieded by a group confrence that it was too small to be a penis and you were unbanned 3 min later? Wazzup? Whahappened..whodidit???? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cpt.Caveman Posted December 13, 2003 Author Share Posted December 13, 2003 Yes my penile entry was small to some but big enough for your woman Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave_Schuldt Posted December 13, 2003 Share Posted December 13, 2003 Cavie = Hedwig and the Angry Inch. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
arlen Posted December 13, 2003 Share Posted December 13, 2003 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Off_White Posted December 13, 2003 Share Posted December 13, 2003 ScottP said:In retrospect, perhaps some books ought to be pulled and tossed; those that are particularly vile. No way Scott, the stuff I disagree with ought to be available. Intellectual freedom is just that, and it's not the Library's job to safeguard anyone's sensibilities, or protect your children from ideas for that matter. For instance, I was pleased as punch to find that my library had a copy of The Turner Diaries (millenial racist survivialist screed that helped inspire Tim McVeigh to bomb the Federal Building in Oklahoma City) on the shelf. Without that, how would I know just what was inside a book I'd only heard about in the media? I didn't read it cover to cover, but I'm sure I spent at least a half hour in power skim mode. When you're talking public institutions, censorship of ANYONE sucks. Of course, a private website is a different thing, just as I would not force you to keep a copy of Mein Kampf in your house, different rules apply to editing content around here. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
allthumbs Posted December 13, 2003 Share Posted December 13, 2003 double standard, offwhite? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Off_White Posted December 13, 2003 Share Posted December 13, 2003 Off_White said: When you're talking public institutions and a private website is a different thing[/b Your reading comprehension sucks buddy. Post any damn thing you want on your OWN website, I'd be glad to defend your right to do so, as well as anyone's right to access it from the Library. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
allthumbs Posted December 13, 2003 Share Posted December 13, 2003 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord_Bosco Posted December 14, 2003 Share Posted December 14, 2003 No one is innocent here. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.