Jump to content

Good Government


incubus

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 211
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

j_b said:

incubus said:

j_b said:

incubus (i.e.trask) said:The evidence he needs is littered throughout the web. You know it, and so does everyone else. It's been presented copiously for about two years now off and on.

 

anecdotal evidence is irrelevant. especially when presented by sensationalistic media and conservative gun totters in need of being reassured because they have an irrational fear of death (or fear of everything different). nothing short of statistics will do.

here ya go press

 

i am afraid this is not a fishing expedition (or at least i am not doing the fishing). you'll have to find the statistics supporting "being attacked by black kids on the streets of Seattle (plenty of those around)". until you do so convincingly (since you appear to take up greg's gig), i'll consider it as irrational fear mongering.

Go for a nice little walky poo in the Central District this Saturday night about midnight. I'll provide a statistic the next day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think you folks may be overestimating the danger of the Central District. Yes, if you walk past one or two corners in the area you may be asking for trouble, but the prior point about how this is Seattle we are talking about still applies. If you want to flirt with danger, try your midnight walk in certain parts of Detroit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

mattp said:

I think you folks may be overestimating the danger of the Central District. Yes, if you walk past one or two corners in the area you may be asking for trouble, but the prior point about how this is Seattle we are talking about still applies. If you want to flirt with danger, try your midnight walk in certain parts of Detroit.

Just watch 8 mile!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

In a related vein, I'd point out that I think gregw is not thinking clearly if he was suggesting that the guy who was killed during the Mardis Gras "riot" would have been well-advised to protect himself with a gun. I would guess that, had he pulled out a gun to protect himself, he might well have been shot by the police. The same fate might have befallen any shopkeeper who stood in front of his storefront and started firing on vandals during WTO (I can't think of any other defensive use that one might have made of their handgun during WTO, unless perhaps it would have been firing back at the police after being pelted with rubber bullets or struck with a billyclub, so I guess this is what he was thinking of).

 

Speculation and reference to various remote scenarios may well be useful in a discussion like this one but I'm not sure these "examples" are proving their intended points.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yah, actually I was going to say something about this yesterday. I spent quite a bit of time downtown during WTO, and you really had to be looking for trouble to get in any. And during those four days a gun would have probably gotten you into more trouble than it could have potentially prevented. I think Greg's argument is weak.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, veggie, I am sure he CAN speak for himself and he probably will. But the notion that Seattle is not such a safe place was brought up in support for his argument that he needs a gun to protect himself in this rough and dirty city of ours.

 

We've talked about the home invasion thing before, and probably will argue about it some more, but we've also been talking about why someone might need to carry their gun around outside of their home.

 

I'd make a similar argument about walking around in the Central District though it is not quite so clear, perhaps, that the gun might not be useful for protection in that situation as when we talk about WTO or MardisGras. But if you went to one of those dangerous corners at midnight on a saturday and pulled out a gun after being approached or accosted by some hoodlum, I bet your chances of survival just dropped considerably.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

mattp said:

But if you went to one of those dangerous corners at midnight on a saturday and pulled out a gun after being approached or accosted by some hoodlum, I bet your chances of survival just dropped considerably.

Matt, smart CCW carry dictates avoiding "risky" areas at all costs. One must be even less aggressive and confrontational when packing. The weapon is a last-ditch tool to save a life. If you come up to me and start a fist fight, even if I'm losing, I cannot legally pull my gun and shoot you. But if you're beating on me and I'm retreating, trying to get away at all costs, and you're obviously so incensed you're going to kill me, then I may be justified in defending myself with my gun. I would shoot only to put you down and stop the threat...not to kill you. I would expect my life to change drastically both emotionally and financially at that point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Contrary to what many might think, when you are carrying a gun you are not going around looking for trouble - quite the opposite I think.

Your example of an encounter on the street corner with one or two people is very different from a drunken mob and would argue you could very well stack the odds in your favor in that situation. Of course one shouldn't draw on a drawn gun so don't go there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

vegetablebelay said:

Certainly GregW can speak for himself, but I think by bringing up Mardi Gras he was simply challenging the notion that Seattle's such a safe place, not necessarily advocating bringing a gun to Mardi Gras.

 

so the whole scenero now works against the utility of a gun for self defense, which was i think the anti-gun argument to start with. cantfocus.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

marylou said:

No I'm reading it just fine. Why would a person bring a gun to downtown Seattle during the WTO?

 

I *had* to be in there and I wasn't protesting. What's the gun going to protect me against? Rioters attacking a random credentialed person?

 

I don't know anyone who brought a gun to WTO, if you do, ask them. Can we drop the riot situations now?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Concealed-carry reform reaffirms the basic idea that citizens have the right to defend themselves against criminal attack. Criminals can strike almost anywhere at any time. Carrying a handgun in public may not be for everyone, but it is a right that most state governments (41 now I believe) have given us. God helps those that help themselves.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




×
×
  • Create New...