Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

So forgive me for asking something that may be obvious to everyone else -- but "wazzup" with the new rating each other feature?

Is this just a "for fun" thing, or is it actually supposed to mean something (i.e. credibility, reliabilty, etc)?

There are no criteria given for how to make the rating -- in other words, are we rating how funny the person is, how frequently they post (seems like that rating is already provided beneath each person's name), how much beer they drink at Pub Club, whether they can climb ice in sandals, or what?

Seems to me that the rating of each other is simply an arbitrary thing that essentially does nothing positive for the board, and has the potential to send people to the battlecage (which happens often enough on this site without having built-in invitations to do so).

Am I missing the point of this function, or do others out there agree with me?

Having said this, I would like to add that I enjoy and appreciate the fact that this web-community exists, and I often get useful route info and entertainment from this site. I'm just not sure of the actual purpose or reason for this new rating feature.

Thanks, Steve [Wazzup]

  • Replies 34
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

It's the new I am more popular than you functionality that Holly asked for. You can even get photos of one another on the profiles.

Look I should have a negative rating before the end of the spray. oops day tongue.gif" border="0

Posted

There ya go boys! I just gave you both a 5-star rating... I'm not sure it really means anything, either. But nonetheless I think you deserved them for all the hard investigative work you've done on these enigmatic ratings.

Posted

quote:

Originally posted by hollyclimber:
Hey, I didn't ASK for it. I asked everyone if we wanted it. And, that was a fun discussion.

I am proud to have the same rating as Cavey. I must have some enemies.

hgb

Scuse me rolleyes.gif" border="0

Posted

Well I don't have a rating, but I think Holly and Cavie have been vastly underrated, I give them each 6...5.5?? ok 5, but that is the lowest I will go. [big Drink][big Drink][big Drink][big Drink][big Drink]

OK now I can go lower *hic* I love this not having to type all that [img()&%()*&^] stuff.

miker cool.gif" border="0

Posted

Who else wants a five star rating?

Step right up! The good ol' 5-star-ratin' club has begun right here. You, too, can become instantly popular with only a single post!

Posted

I can't handle this kind of pressure! I have a hard enough time getting rejected by the ladies, now I have to deal with it here!!!!!!!!!!????

[ 10-26-2001: Message edited by: Charlie ]

Posted

quote:

Originally posted by pope:
That one's from me, ScottP.

quote:

Originally posted by Jman:
There's 5 from me, as well. I know how it feels to be unpopular. So buck up, little camper! We all think you deserve to be popular, too!

You guys are tops in my book.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




×
×
  • Create New...