erik

ahahaha is this another one of those experts from a far threads?? i mean we've all seen the pictures!!! but does that do it any justice!! gspot is one more technique or idea to implement in bedroom games!!! one must have a whole repetoire to be a skilled love maker!!!

muffin, i hope that misguided comment was not directed at me! layback a face crack!!! tho i think this weekend it is gonna be all fingers and hands for this kid!!!

and your not muslim nor has your culture been ingrained with this thought process for thousands of years. peanut anyone?

i think what ray is saying that why do you choose to impose your beliefs on an entire people whom know only that, their entire life is that and their entire heritage is that? it does not matter what outsiders think, they could careless. the muslim's are still a tribal people for the most part, they live their lives as they did a 1000 years ago in many regards. don't impose your morals on someone else, as you did not want to someone to do to you.

a say a pony keg a person should work out about right!

so true. infedelity is a shitty thing anyways. people whom participate in it lack somethings.

LETS GET THE LINK TO THAT.

um he is not banned? u people dense!

http://www.cascadeclimbers.com/threadz/showflat.php?Cat=&Board=UBB2&Number=242085&page=0&view=collapsed&sb=5&o=&fpart=1 and i think robertm did a route on the same feature(vasaliki ridge)

whats her name? but i personally love a healthy thrutch. more crack equals the ability to use more body! much better for us fat people! once i obtain some strength, consider me game for the thinner stuff!

i saw dywaner lurking today.

which one are you?

i posted some more!!! http://www.cascadeclimbers.com/plab/showgallery.php?cat=997&thumb=1

greg my point on stats is that you can cite them and not be attacked, but if someone else posts stats you do not agree with they are utter bullshit, but you offer noting to refute them other then emotion and insults??? hmmmmm......

so there is no equivilant, on the side of the libs? and so with the stats thing why bring it up at all? (and dont say cuz jb did). because it is all a matter of perception and not truth. so they are a null point, expecially without actual cited material. tho i have a hard time believing 2 million crimes were averted due to gun ownership. how does that factor? and do they include screwed up drug deals with guns involved? pete lives over in s capital hill, we have walked the street a bunch at night...so far, i have been offered several blow jobs and some crack. i declined the crack. there is no right, but how can you claim that owning an high capacity handgun will save you better then owning a revolver? if the legal gun owner was responsible it would only take one bullet. so maybe a black power gun would be in order?

liberals take our rights away in smaller doses. Seat belt law. helmet Law and the such... they are the 'Great Mommy State' and tell us it is for our own good. It is not the same... but over time as the # of laws add up... the effect is the same. There should realy only be three laws ummm not quite equivilant now is it? personally being in the insurance industry am i glad there are seat belt laws, helmet laws. my favorite part is denying claims to people who have been killed in auto accidents, silly things like wearing their seat belt or speeding would have saved them. but then again what does the 'mommy state' know? or when you see a 19 yr old girl now retarded from head injuries....oops no seat belt. you think making you wear your seat belt takes away from your life? hardly. i think the fed govenment being able to tap my phone, read my bank statments, read my email all seem a bit more over the top then not wearing my seat belt.

greg, non of those instances you describe include home invasion. all are drug and alcohol related. i dont think any firearms were required at wto. and you cite jb's stats to be trumped up and bullshit. which ones are the right ones? i would like to know. also while you are busy researching feel free to help me out by letting me know how the libs are removing my rights in an equivilant manner to patriot act 1 and 2. thanks!

greg you lose sight of what you are talking about when you attempt to belittle people on the small mistakes. petty really.

I'm insulted by your use of profanity. Totally uncalled for.

This is because you are completely unaware. make me so then. i am always interested.

i think you all should shut the fuck up. instead of personal insults, insult their theories and ideas. insulting people makes you look like the asshole and your opinion as well. thanks!

greg, the only people i see actively trying to remover personal freedoms is asscroft and the rest of bushy co. so it makes me wonder, give up my high capacity hand gun? or allow the fed/state government to enter my life when they deem so, and not when i have done anything wrong. so far i have really enjoyed the new security at the airport. about had to remove my pants as they had metal buttons on them. luckily with enough grooping of my package mr security agent got what he needed! so i do not see how you can claim the libs to be so activly erroding the constitutional rights, when the conservs are pushing so hard for it??