cj001f

preach that. and have fewer stop lights on arterials. people should be able to stomach the inconvenience of going an extra block or two to access an arterial for the sake of traffic flow. CUE THE RETARD SEATTLEITES WANTING TO PRESERVE THEIR "RURAL" HERITAGE JUST BECAUSE YOU DRIVE A PICKUP TRUCK AND HAVE AN IQ LOWER THAN 70 DOESNT MEAN YOU LIVE IN THE STICKS DIPSHIT

happy birthday!

I believe the more appropriate phrase for this discussion would be "carbon assprint". Or methane assprint? fountain of CO2

The feds killed my eat whatever you want and still lose weight tapeworm diet scheme.

yes, notions of normalcy are touchingly inane especially when they come from someone who rides the shortbus err the mentally challenged

Jesus doesn't love them

Aren't you the one who supports politicians who've lamented the lack of sodomy laws? Espouse fiscal responsibility as you passionately argue for another useless invasion? Or is this one of those times you'll change loyalties and express your libertarian bias nobly pissing your vote away

Oh, several Destinys, more than a few Ambers, and hundreds of other strippers in training

dude, who would ever want to leave Tacoma? You've got all you need right there.

I've heard anal sex relieves the symptoms

offer head at a pub club or a quick fuck at a ropeup

I prefer panamanian prostitutes

and mushrooms. I want some mushrooms cj001f is in need of a good russian bender right now

YOU FUCKING CUNT KK! YOU OWE ME A CASE OF VODKA!

I disagree. The article suggests the appraised value of the company was not as high as the inheritor wanted. The value of this business, like other service businesses, may lie primarily in its brand and/or the cache of its service providers. The younger a business, the more the value lies in its providers. If a key provider leaves or dies that will diminish the value of the enterprise. Older businesses, with more established track records and brand recognition, will take less of a hit when one or two key people leave. These factors would be true of any guiding business, so I don't think it speaks to the quality of MM as a guide service. I think the article says a lot more. It mentions some misinformation (withheld) during the search. It also mentions the poor working relationship w/ others during the search. That reflects on everyone involved. It also mentions a greiving mother who somehow doesn't feel too connected w/ the company her daughter owned. That is supported and reflected by an absurb comment from the chairman of the board who actually said to the press about the entire affair, "Disappointment was born of expectation." What sensitivity! Aren't you a guide?

Exactly how many industry imposed consumer product regulations have been successful?

Rack is grilled. I'm releasing green house gases

Unless you are claiming eating disorders and other clinically diagnosable psychological ailments are the same severity as climbing you've absolutely no leg to stand on here.

Soylent Green? I'm having rack of cubicleraised officepark dad for dinner with a nice chimmichurri and an excellant Pinot

just like for global warming Oh, I agree. The most effective solution would be a massive tax on carbon usage. Unfortunately this would 1) probably cause substantial short term economic disruption 2) further encourage wastrel politicians to piss away money archenemy - "carbon footprint" is short hand for the turds they leave behind

Because there is plenty of evidence to show regulation of such procedures is not a simple matter? Merely saying it is simple does not change the substantial amount of data showing for the population as a whole it is not simple. Continue trying to change human nature to fit your system JayB, it worked so well for the Soviets

Perhaps you should benefit society and remove yourself from this debate. Your continued presence merely showcases your multiple mental inadequacies and embarasses us all.

The self employed who've had to purchase do moan. They also moan about health insurance costs. The people who receive it through their corporation don't moan, because corporate health insurance has truly bizarre rate calculations in my experience(namely roughly similar rates despite ancedotally dramatic differences in longterm care requirements, age and health of employees).

As has been pointed out KK, telling people what they "need" to hear often isn't the most effective means of getting them to change their behavior. Which I believe is the subject of this, right? Getting people to change their behavior? Long winded insulting rants whether it be on weight or politics rarely change opinions. They are a nice release though

I thought we were charging every individual for the risk they incurred? You can stay perfectly healthy with negligible injury risk riding the stationary bike and using the stairmaster