cj001f

Unless some massive network springs up overnight they will - they are a more desirable service, as shown by this thread...

There you go with your rightwing hyperbole again KK. Life would have been just fine for the Africans coming from the congo region, er, at least until King Leopold came along....

suck on a lemon, bitch

Yes it's been going on for a bit. la plus ca change, la plus que c'est le meme chose. The same shit has been going on, and people do the same hand wringing and tourists stay away for no real reason making life even harder for the average Nepali I was here first.

fisting is not apropriate for this website

Pardon me JayB, do you have any Grey Poupon?

90% of internet posters think they are cool. Fact

the secretary has 2

Probably a "canyoneering" class. Even worse.

You have not enough tentacles to be my boss.

copy cat bitch

No, but they were built in a different era of the NPS. The Ostrander was the first in what was envisioned to be a series of ski huts streching across the Yosemite backcountry.

Pissed you didn't get to wear the dress?

Just improving the team focus Roger. I'm a blackbelt in this stuff, and we're going to kick ass. Now lets hit the ground running so we don't lose traction and really focus on customer oriented solutions.

I have that problem without browsing cc.com. "action item" "critical path" "roadmap" bwahaahaaa

aaarrr, I love it when you dominate, aaarrrr

you need a beige lexus with gold trim to complete the ensemble luqayo

www.patagonia.com

I guess I need an enema poll next...

I almost bought KennyG's kayak on craigslist

Is this queer eye for the pseudo-climber?

you got laid on the way to work and you are complaining? You in the closet with PP?

you always struck me as a stiletto closet queen PP

Last I checked cc.com has an Idaho and Montana forum. More proof of just how groovy competition can be! truly an invisible hand in this case

The 2 ski huts I frequent, the Ostrander Hut in Yosemite NP and the Pear Lake Hut in Sequoia NP are both run by volunteer organisations. They, like the Sierra Club huts, are finding that the $20/night fee charged is no longer enough to cover maintenance, repair, scheduling and the caretaker necessary to make sure the building is in decent shape, and that they cannot raise enough capital through donations to subsidize the huts. The only large network of huts in the US (10th mountain) is $28 a night. That's more than what you people want to spend, and there's only so long you can run something at a loss. While people here seem to be opposed, the "European" model of hut providing sleeping and profitable food & booze is probably more sustainable. At least it's looking that way in the Columbia's of Canada. And showers are a heck of alot more civilized You may find this story of the friends hut interesting: http://www.wildsnow.com/articles/lous_backcountry/9-2/friends-hut.html