akhalteke

I never said they did.

Palin is warming the bench; not leading it. Ahem Cough Cough

Definitely biased, but good perspective none-the-less. Earmarks

Anyone else noticing a pattern here?

3) It is actually a pretty good article if you ignore any bias.

I would vote for him if he were running for president against McCain; or a lot of people for that matter. Too bad that liberals need a flamboyant and hip mascot to lead their team or they might have won this election. It was theirs to lose after the last 8 years...

Huh. I lived in Cashmere and I never got a ticket once. Never even pulled over.

1) Its an Opinion piece douche-bag 2) Your 1st tip should have been the picture ofthe barrel chested McCain waving the flag and Obama looking like he was dropping a barbed wire turd.

the liberal propaganda and misinformation machine is trucking along as usual Let's try this again, SLOW: There. is. nothing. in. the. article. that. you. posted. that. suggests. that. the. reporter. in. question. didn't. know. the. picture. was. a. fake. How do you keep falling for this trash? Research. Snopes.com.

Only after mainstream media picks it up as verifiable truth.

Tvash, your ad hominem arguments are pretty weak.

Officially, yes. In actuality, no.

You fooled me there. Its all relative lapushka.

Glad you think so but I am not. Cultish? You'd better believe it. Totalitarian? "of or pertaining to a centralized government that does not tolerate parties of differing opinion and that exercises dictatorial control over many aspects of life." You betchya Asset Raping Shitbag: I will let FW take this one.

Actually the whole world is. Good news is that oil will be back to $80/bbl again soon.

Nailed that one on the head boss. I aint that young anymore and I have no need to prove myself. Already have.

Well, when we make that first cell and let it evolve into a human a few dozen times, I will concede the point to you then. See you in 2,398,897 bish!

Could you please provide some examples of the latter for our consideration? Tvash.

There is much that surpasses the knowledge of science. There are things which science cannot explain. Maybe when the Particle Accelerator reaches full speed in a few months we'll know more. I just think you are assuming a lot when you place all your stock in one idea; particularly when that idea is not complete. Furthermore, denigrating others for their beliefs is not conducive to teaching them why they are wrong. I have worked with people with extremely different beliefs than I and have witnessed others using your tactics to try and secure victory. You may be right but you will convince no-one. You wonder why people don't adhere to your theory? Probably because pompous people like you are so condescending and rude. Furthermore, countering one piece of evidence of a theory doesn't necessarily negate the validity of the theory. Nor does chit-chat about bananas.

I disagree and believe that anyone who believes that they "know" beyond a shadow of a doubt that they know exactly what happened and how is: 1) A narcissistic fool 2) Is afraid that their delicate views of the way things are would be shattered if they were to think for themselves and use all information available to formulate their idea of what life is, what the meaning of it is and why we are here. This goes both ways. There are religious maniacs on both sides of the spectrum. Some religious maniacs choose God and some choose Darwin.

"Personally, I want a weak president" I can see why you support B-Ho.

It can be said verbatim about Obama as well. Perspective my dear lad.

That you have dismissed the possibility of the fallibility of the human mind is scary.

So why would you think I was capable of something superior when my postings have been so meager?

Why? Because you don't have me pegged as a bible thumper with no education? OK, have fun man!