akhalteke

It is really quite simple: We are given the right to bear arms and I will continue to do so. I am a responsible gun owner and enjoy the recreational aspects of the sport, the historical aspects of the birth of our freedom as well as the personal protection guaranteed by my ongoing practice aptitude with a firearm. Simple as that. Good luck taking mine away; all I have to say.

Take 30 aspirin and slit your wrists you pathetic whiner. When you complain about people being nice, you know you have a problem; a problem that can only be solved with chemicals and sharp knives.

I miss the good ol days.

Dec. I haven't slept in 3 days. Going to bed now. LOL. Have fun kids.

Yes, I will be the one carrying the M-16 A-1/Kalashnikov/RPG/M-203/M1A and an old school pineapple grenade in the above picture.

If there were a band of domestic terrorists waging war against the United States and the Constitution, you would refuse an order to open fire on them because they're your "brothers and sisters?" I thought you were a military man. Remember the Civil War? The U.S. Army sure didn't have a problem firing upon their "brothers and sisters" then. Why is Fort Knox protected by the military? Sounds like the military would never think to attack U.S. citizens. We should just walk over there, kick open the gate and take some of that gold. Read up on the duties of soldiers. Also: What constitutes a lawful order. We are not in a civil war. If there were terrorists againsthe constitution, it would defeat the purpose for those in a militia to defend the constitution wouldn't it? I am sure the FBI, ATF, ect. would have that taken care of. Not really my bag baby.

american provided stingers seemed to make a pretty decisive difference for the mujis though ...and the Taliban didn't have any weapon selling allis? Please.

Dude, I'd be like 125 years old! WTF? That's the time kiddo. 9:00. I thought you counter strike players knew that kinda thing. Why did you edit my reply? That is quite stupid. We can discuss it in Dec. anyhow.

Never too late to vilify enemies of the State.

Still haven't seen the pictures because of the "broken camera." For someone with sure purported vast income, it has sure taken him a long time to post a pic.

ditto

OK try this. List the weapons that the British military has at its disposal now that it didn't have 225 years ago. How would a rag-tag band of patriots with hunting rifles fare against a modern military? So your point is rediculous. Second, are you in favor of keeping a strong, unbreached posse comitatus act? Bug. What did the invading units in Afghanistan have that the Soviets didn't have at their disposal? They rode horses and shot Kalashnikovs for Christ's sake. Ever hear about Roger's rangers? Unconventional Warfare is a motherfucker man. Don't underestimate.

I have been shot twice. Still like them for recreation as well as the final checks and balances they provide.

What military actions have 3rd ID completed? None? Right. So what is the difference between garrison soldiers and NorthCom deployed soldiers? I should have suspected that you would post a salon.com article. I get my news from many sources from many countries, many in different languages. Counterpoint: If the posse comitatus act has been breached, then why oh why would you give up the only thing that stopped the british 225+ years ago? Seems a little backward to me. Just a thought.

I will probably be in Iraq or Afghanistan. Same as if Obama gets elected.

Wasn't voting for him anyways. Can't vote for obama because Biden says Obama will attract violence upon us.

Nope. That's not even close to what he said. Dumbass. Actually, that was precisely what he said you loud mouthed fuck. Entirely out of context ""Also, I am pretty sure you wouldn't talk like you do in real life, so why don't you tone it down? Anything I say on here, I will say to your face. Please do me the same courtesy."" ROTFLMAO!!!!! IN THE VERY NEXT POST!!!!! HYPOCRIT!!!!!!!! I never made any kind of personal attack on you so I don't know what you're talking about. My points are valid, you have ZERO counter to the majority of them, so then you try to insinuate I'm attacking you personally. McCain and Palin are outclassed, you could just tell by the way McCain was acting in the last debate, he knows he's beat. Nope. Cause I will say it to your face. Prole, 20 Sept. 2008 ~ 2100.

but again, the guns out there aren't checking or balancing a damn thing, like joe said - the 82nd airborne can probably take on every gun-nut in the country together and come out just fine, no? You mean like the entire Wehrmacht against a handful of Jews in Poland? Doubtful the 82nd airborne would do that against their brothers and sisters. I'd look to any banana republic that has banned guns as a role model for the potential without them. Apparently, you've never served in the military. Go wipe out some militia kooks doing violence against our government? Fuck.Yeah. First, you'd be branded a terrorist. Our boys and girls in uniform would then relish wiping your ass out. No I wouldn't. I agree with him and there is that pesky Posse Comitatus thingy to deal with

no doubt - and just look at the all the good they've done in creating stable societies in such exotic places as somalia, afghanistan, the congo, etc. Or the USA

Nope. That's not even close to what he said. Dumbass. Actually, that was precisely what he said you loud mouthed fuck.

Well the jet thing is another point demonstrating the typical bush/McCain incompetence and privilege. How many regular pilots would be allowed to keep their wings in the Navy with that many broad daylight crashes? Let's see Robert E. Lee was second in his class. Grant the Butcher 21st out of 39 Patton 46th out of 109 Eisenhower upper half all of these could at least be arguably average, especially considering the small numbers in the classes. BTW, thanks Hugh for doing my work for me. McCain 5th out of 899. You guys really want to argue this is even "average" much less "above"? People graduating from this institution are far from average to begin with. I very much doubt, but a few of you could have had a chance of attending. I am amused that you think that Grant's performance, well under 50%, is so great. And also that failing out and repeating your plebe year is somehow indicative of greatness. I was merely pointing out that grad status has little to do with success. Look at Lee as you pointed out. Where did he finish again? #2. And how did his position end up? Right. You clearly got me kiddo. Be a little less pompous and open minded. You cant really think that everyone that disagrees with you is void of intellect/ education. There are different ways to solve problems and different ways to look at things. Also, I am pretty sure you wouldn't talk like you do in real life, so why don't you tone it down? Anything I say on here, I will say to your face. Please do me the same courtesy.

He believes in a federal ban on "assault rifles" as well as handguns. He states that states can take away but not give gun rights back to citizens. How is this conservative? at very best, depending on where you live, you cannot have many of the guns you currently own, nor carry them for personal defense. This is absolutely outrageous.

It can be updated any time. It's called the amendment process. Do you consider the first amendment 'outdated' too? I mean, the writers could never have conceived the internet...or television or even radio! Hell, maybe Obama can manipulate the states and congress into the opening of a constitutional convention! Wouldn't that be just wonderful! People like you scare me. You must be part of that 50% TTK is talking about. Hey Dumbass, here are some other things the founding fathers did'nt foresee in the flintlock, ball and powder, musket, whatever era: Cocaine the Tec-9 Suicide Attacks at Wendy's High School John Woo The Drive-By Meth Snoop Detroit Virginia Tech As usual, in the name of freedom you're blindly clinging to an outmoded belief at complete odds with reality. Why do you always need to evoke the 1st Amendment in order to defend the second? Can it not stand on its own merits? Why not evoke the 4th (a much better barometer of individual freedom from the State)? Is it because you've been happy to undermine that one in the "changed realities of the 21st century"? What are the merits of a "free market" in assault weapons these days? Is the Constitution holy scripture? You're happy to evoke the amendment process in theory as an example of its flexibility and the sage wisdom of the "fathers", but you seem not so keen on exercising that right. Nearly every other advanced democracy in the world has changed, amended, or outright replaced its constitution numerous times in the last 200 years. What's our problem? All great reasons to own firearms. As is the increasingly large size of government. Remember the real reason that the 2nd amendment was put into place; as a final checks and balances for government. We haven't needed it in over 225 years, but that doesn't mean we wont.

Bullshit. Complete and utter bullshit.

I think a comparison would be considerably more facile than a contrast. I find it rather ironic that many on this site unilaterally question the intelligence of those that disagree with you. The fact is that GWB as well as McCain are well above the average intelligence. All of the rumors about GWB have been debunked and you have little left but whitewashing epithets to fall back on. Intelligence does indeed have little to do with being a successful leader; and that is what a politician (especially a high ranking one) must be. I wont even bother challenging you to find the sources of the alleged intellectual incompetence on the behalf of GWB and McCain; it has been refuted a dz. times before and doing so again would achieve nothing.