akhalteke

...

Here are a few

It'll be out in a little bit.

Oh, I hate the commie pissant. I just don't advocate murder.

...but I am not suprised. Apparently the ATF has uncovered an assasination plot against Obama.

The status quo--as of today--is just fine with me. You OK with that? Which guns legal today do you think should be banned? how about all guns legal today have to be registered? Nope. What would the point of that be? why not? where's the harm? Check Germany in the 30's.

It is really quite simple: We are given the right to bear arms and I will continue to do so. I am a responsible gun owner and enjoy the recreational aspects of the sport, the historical aspects of the birth of our freedom as well as the personal protection guaranteed by my ongoing practice aptitude with a firearm. Simple as that. Good luck taking mine away; all I have to say.

Take 30 aspirin and slit your wrists you pathetic whiner. When you complain about people being nice, you know you have a problem; a problem that can only be solved with chemicals and sharp knives.

I miss the good ol days.

Dec. I haven't slept in 3 days. Going to bed now. LOL. Have fun kids.

Yes, I will be the one carrying the M-16 A-1/Kalashnikov/RPG/M-203/M1A and an old school pineapple grenade in the above picture.

If there were a band of domestic terrorists waging war against the United States and the Constitution, you would refuse an order to open fire on them because they're your "brothers and sisters?" I thought you were a military man. Remember the Civil War? The U.S. Army sure didn't have a problem firing upon their "brothers and sisters" then. Why is Fort Knox protected by the military? Sounds like the military would never think to attack U.S. citizens. We should just walk over there, kick open the gate and take some of that gold. Read up on the duties of soldiers. Also: What constitutes a lawful order. We are not in a civil war. If there were terrorists againsthe constitution, it would defeat the purpose for those in a militia to defend the constitution wouldn't it? I am sure the FBI, ATF, ect. would have that taken care of. Not really my bag baby.

american provided stingers seemed to make a pretty decisive difference for the mujis though ...and the Taliban didn't have any weapon selling allis? Please.

Dude, I'd be like 125 years old! WTF? That's the time kiddo. 9:00. I thought you counter strike players knew that kinda thing. Why did you edit my reply? That is quite stupid. We can discuss it in Dec. anyhow.

Never too late to vilify enemies of the State.

Still haven't seen the pictures because of the "broken camera." For someone with sure purported vast income, it has sure taken him a long time to post a pic.

ditto

OK try this. List the weapons that the British military has at its disposal now that it didn't have 225 years ago. How would a rag-tag band of patriots with hunting rifles fare against a modern military? So your point is rediculous. Second, are you in favor of keeping a strong, unbreached posse comitatus act? Bug. What did the invading units in Afghanistan have that the Soviets didn't have at their disposal? They rode horses and shot Kalashnikovs for Christ's sake. Ever hear about Roger's rangers? Unconventional Warfare is a motherfucker man. Don't underestimate.

I have been shot twice. Still like them for recreation as well as the final checks and balances they provide.

What military actions have 3rd ID completed? None? Right. So what is the difference between garrison soldiers and NorthCom deployed soldiers? I should have suspected that you would post a salon.com article. I get my news from many sources from many countries, many in different languages. Counterpoint: If the posse comitatus act has been breached, then why oh why would you give up the only thing that stopped the british 225+ years ago? Seems a little backward to me. Just a thought.

I will probably be in Iraq or Afghanistan. Same as if Obama gets elected.

Wasn't voting for him anyways. Can't vote for obama because Biden says Obama will attract violence upon us.

Nope. That's not even close to what he said. Dumbass. Actually, that was precisely what he said you loud mouthed fuck. Entirely out of context ""Also, I am pretty sure you wouldn't talk like you do in real life, so why don't you tone it down? Anything I say on here, I will say to your face. Please do me the same courtesy."" ROTFLMAO!!!!! IN THE VERY NEXT POST!!!!! HYPOCRIT!!!!!!!! I never made any kind of personal attack on you so I don't know what you're talking about. My points are valid, you have ZERO counter to the majority of them, so then you try to insinuate I'm attacking you personally. McCain and Palin are outclassed, you could just tell by the way McCain was acting in the last debate, he knows he's beat. Nope. Cause I will say it to your face. Prole, 20 Sept. 2008 ~ 2100.

but again, the guns out there aren't checking or balancing a damn thing, like joe said - the 82nd airborne can probably take on every gun-nut in the country together and come out just fine, no? You mean like the entire Wehrmacht against a handful of Jews in Poland? Doubtful the 82nd airborne would do that against their brothers and sisters. I'd look to any banana republic that has banned guns as a role model for the potential without them. Apparently, you've never served in the military. Go wipe out some militia kooks doing violence against our government? Fuck.Yeah. First, you'd be branded a terrorist. Our boys and girls in uniform would then relish wiping your ass out. No I wouldn't. I agree with him and there is that pesky Posse Comitatus thingy to deal with

no doubt - and just look at the all the good they've done in creating stable societies in such exotic places as somalia, afghanistan, the congo, etc. Or the USA