rob

God, some of you guys sound like total hard-ons. A bunch of regular sleuths. How many of you have actually spoken with the climbers? You should apply your forensic powers to even bigger problems, like who stole the Lindbergh baby, or how that block got knocked off of city park. You're on a roll!

Sack up, bill. War is what we do. Send the boys in!!!

I dunno. I haven't seen her hands. Have you?

YEEEEE-HAW!

Isn't this being done already, via vaccines? Kevbone sent me a youtube video about it.

North Korea is on the way to Iran. Our bombers can just make a little detour.

Obviously Iran torpedoed the s.korean ship in an effort to implicate N.Korea and distract us from stopping Iran's attempts at world domination. It's very similar to Israel masterminding 9/11 and blaming it on the arabs, or Roosevelt allowing pearl harbor to be attacked by the japanese. It's all coming full circle. We've been saving the world long enough. If someone's got a problem with us, I say we kick 'em in the balls and knock them onto the ground and give them a curbie. Then they can't bite our dick while we mouth-fuck them.

You gotta break some eggs to make an omelet. N.Korea could be a theme-park attraction. Disney could buy the rights, and finance the war. You've got to think bigger, Bill. Disappointing. We can use all of the bodies to soak up oil in the gulf, and anybody left alive down there, well, we'll tell them they won the war and make them work as cashiers at Dineyland Korea. They'll never know the difference.

They prob don't even have nukes. The one they tested was pretty much a dud. Kill them all. Then the S.Koreans can come and rebuild on top of the piles of mud and bodies.

psh, their nukes can't reach us. They'd prob get S.Korea or Japan, but not us. S.Korea should just man up and take the hit. Pussies. I don't think we need nukes, anyway. We can pound everything in site from the air, can't we? Kill everybody. Done. Then just leave it smoking pile of rubble and let someone else deal with it. Don't even bother sending in ground troops. If anyone is still crawling around down there, just hit 'em again. You guys need to sack up.

I still think that we could pretty much demolish them. It would be trickier if China defended them, for sure, then it's not worth it. But would they? China kinda wants to be a world power. Would they stick their neck out for N. Korea anymore? N. Korea kinda keeps making them look bad. Militarily, do you really doubt we could fuck that country back to the stone age pretty easily? It's not the 50's. I'm not talking about occupation or regime change and counter-insurgency or anything like that. I'm just talking about demolishing their government, blowing their shit up, and plunging them into total chaos and anarchy. Isn't that kind of our "thing?"

Hey tvash, you're pretty uppity. Can I see some papers?

Sorry, please provide a youtube video.

How long until Kevbone posts a video telling us that N. Korea is innocent, and that Japan did it using a stolen korean torpedo, and that Bush gave the order to fire?

So, I'm jaywalking, and a cop stops me. Do I need a driver's license? What if I have no ID? Right now, citizens don't NEED to have ID, just to go out, do they? I mean, if they're driving or drinking, sure, but otherwise there is no reason I HAVE to have my ID on me at all times, is there? Now there kinda is, isn't there?

So, I've thought about this some more. Actually, I'm OK with so-called "sanctuary cities." Well, actually, it's complicated. I think there is a big difference between deciding not to enforce a law, and deciding to enforce an additional law. For example; I'm totally in support of the City of Seattle deciding not to enforce marijuana laws relating to simple possession. I feel like this sort of "look the other way" allows cities and states to rebel against overreaching federal control. This isn't really the same as enforcing a law in opposition of the federal government which disenfranchises citizens. There seems to be an important distinction there. In the former example, nobody is being oppressed as a result. So, is it OK for states and cities to "flout" federal law? I guess my answer to that is, it depends. What's the effect? Is the flouting of the law protecting civil liberties, or threatening them? Because when it comes down to it, that's more important than "the law." Thanks for the response, but that's some seriously convoluted logic. You spoke of disenfranchising "citizens", but, of course, that's not at all what we're talking about here. The AZ law does nothing that federal law doesn't also provide for--if only those laws were enforced. I don't think any citizen should have to prove his citizenship to a police officer during a routine matter such as a traffic stop. The Arizona legislation increases that chances of that happening. You don't think that's wrong?

You really think they're in the same position they were in 50+ years ago?

WTF? OK, seriously. They fucking torpedo a ship, and people are like, "Oh, you better not do this anymore. This time we mean it!" Seriously. I mean, I'm not really much of a hawk, but W T F

I hope I can find serenity like yours one day.

this post actually made me dumber.

Actually, it's probably better at night. I assume I'm invisible, anyway. During daylight, I figure none of those fuckers will even see me ANYWAY (or care, at least), but at least at night, there are less of them. And their headlights make them easier to see. Anyway, you're posting on a trip report on a climbing website saying that riding your bike at night is too dangerous? Also, Josh, it's a good idea to keep a U-Lock handy for protection against both dogs. Those things can bash some skull.

Common sense? WTF is that? There is nothing wrong with riding your bike down Highway 2 to go climbing. More people should do that. Josh, do you need some bike lights? I have some you can have. FREE!