i_like_sun

OK, I'm just wondering now, how the HELL did a discussion about sex and rock climbing turn into a verbal religion odyssey? Leave it to the climber overthinkers to jack up a perfectly innocent discussion about fucking.

Similarities — whether of DNA, anatomy, embryonic development, or anything else — are better explained in terms of creation by a common Designer than by evolutionary relationship. The great differences between organisms are of greater significance than the similarities, and evolutionism has no explanation for these if they all are assumed to have had the same ancestor. How could these great gaps between kinds ever arise at all, by any natural process? Yeah, a single creator made it all, all right. Gadda love the self induced frontal lobotomy. How does it feel? Hey you clueless twit. Fuck you. So, you think you have it more figured out than the likes of Einstein and Steven Hawking? HUuummmm??? Dumbass. Even Einstein beleived in a way, dumbass. He was smart enough to know all this wasn't by chance. So, the quick answer to the question is that Einstein did not believe in a personal God. It is however, interesting how he arrived at that conclusion. In developing the theory of relativity, Einstein realized that the equations led to the conclusion that the universe had a beginning. He didn't like the idea of a beginning, because he thought one would have to conclude that the universe was created by God. So, he added a cosmological constant to the equation to attempt to get rid of the beginning. He said this was one of the worst mistakes of his life. Of course, the results of Edwin Hubble confirmed that the universe was expanding and had a beginning at some point in the past. So, Einstein became a deist - a believer in an impersonal creator God: "I believe in Spinoza's God who reveals himself in the orderly harmony of what exists, not in a God who concerns himself with fates and actions of human beings." "But, on the other hand, every one who is seriously involved in the pursuit of science becomes convinced that a spirit is manifest in the laws of the Universe - a spirit vastly superior to that of man, and one in the face of which we with our modest powers must feel humble. In this way the pursuit of science leads to a religious feeling of a special sort, which is indeed quite different from the religiosity of someone more naive. [c. Dukas and Hoffman]" Alright, Seahawks, you've gained some ground with me. Agreed, Einstein was a very spiritually minded physicist. I don't remember the exact quote, but it was something to the effect of him saying "the universe is too beautiful, perfect and imperfect to have been formed by pure chance". If you ask more modern thinkers about the ideas of god and creation (namely thinking of Richard Dawkins and Steven Hawking), it seems as though atheism is a bit of a cultural trend right now. I personally am not atheist, nor am I religious in any way. I find myself making this observation: the longer I live, the more I realize how infinitely complex and beautiful the world and universe is. It therefore seems logical that death is equally as mysterious. A simple blackout seems like a pretty simple and easy answer to the end of human life. I wonder that there just may be something far more interesting. Who knows. My earlier response to your post stemmed from the fact that I have a very low tolerance for people who are excessively rigid with their beliefs about creationism. I've known way too many people who have essentially stopped their intellectual development because they never question and think about the possibility that theoretical science might be on to something. cheers.

Oly, that is fucking awsome!

Similarities — whether of DNA, anatomy, embryonic development, or anything else — are better explained in terms of creation by a common Designer than by evolutionary relationship. The great differences between organisms are of greater significance than the similarities, and evolutionism has no explanation for these if they all are assumed to have had the same ancestor. How could these great gaps between kinds ever arise at all, by any natural process? Yeah, a single creator made it all, all right. Gadda love the self induced frontal lobotomy. How does it feel? Hey you clueless twit. Fuck you. So, you think you have it more figured out than the likes of Einstein and Steven Hawking? HUuummmm??? Dumbass.

I think and hope so! Yeah, yur a climber. All you need is that desperate and longful face when you are NOT climbing. Then we all know how addicted you are.....

DEMMIT CARTMEN, YOU FARTED!

Climbers can also be the biggest DORKS out of all populations.

K, those just get annoying.

I full heartedly agree. A martini is a martini, not a shot of gin.

Similarities — whether of DNA, anatomy, embryonic development, or anything else — are better explained in terms of creation by a common Designer than by evolutionary relationship. The great differences between organisms are of greater significance than the similarities, and evolutionism has no explanation for these if they all are assumed to have had the same ancestor. How could these great gaps between kinds ever arise at all, by any natural process? Yeah, a single creator made it all, all right. Gadda love the self induced frontal lobotomy.

Because american culture is so out of touch with the natural world and our own body chemistry that the average wanker's brain is no longer capable of intelligent insight.

You shit when you whack off? Dude that is VERY odd.

Yeah but there is so much potential going through those power lines that my neighbor wont even notice that her house lights are slightly dimmer!

Dude, that is soo funny! Here's a wild sexual fantasy: Free soloing some knarly wall, then base jumping from the top straight down into a pub at the bottom!

Agreed. Sherri! Come back!

Arc. Sidewinder AR, mens, Medium, kangaroo brown, used less than 10 times. Perfect shape. Open to price negotiation.

Although it is probably not REALLY necessary, take a helmet for the upper chutes. I almost died there once.

Dude, the dude ripped ass at sex AND climbing!

What changed in the power line so that you didn't violate any conservation laws? Nothing. Its genuine innocent energy theft. Do you have a problem with it?

Kevbone, you would.

uhhm, climbing AND sex. Can't seperate them. Climbing IS sex pink. Didn't you know that? Just ask Freud.

I use skippy in place of Cams. You just squish the rope into a big blob of it. Works PERFECT, EVERY TIME.

I like the Bruce Lee idea.

Well, climbing increases my testosterone and thus my desire to start remove clothing. Sex also increases testosterone, and thus pumps me up to go shred some mountains. Sex AND the mountains? All I have to say is: YUP. Pink, you kick ass.