i_like_sun

Good words. We can also get handouts for being morbidly obese, but they're lowering Social Security..............

Fuck you!

Today I went online to download a south park ringer tone: "Whats the matter, got sand in your vagina?" Repeat 35 times in a high pitch cartmen voice. Everything was going great and I was laughing my ass off, when all of a sudden I started to get text messages from the website every 4.5 seconds. Now, my number is ruined and I can't seem to get the text messages to end! I suppose thats what happens when you put your number on the web........ idiot........

Actually, citrus is almost as good a source of potassium as bananas, and its easily packed into the mountains (bananas squish). Also, I've been reading that magnesium is more important for exercise performance than potassium is. And citrus is superior to bananas for that. Also, zinc is an ULTRA important component to muscle recovery. Exercise depletes it quite a bit, so it is crucial to eat a diet where we get enough of it. This is where MEAT comes into the picture (especially steak and shellfish). So the whole "lets go smash down a post climb steak" is actually one of the best things we can do! OK I'm done.....

We have a dunk tank at Western. If you pay 20 bucks we'll fill it up and do hydrostatic weighing on you. Oops, but we're not in PDX.......

If you don't want a ticket for speeding, don't speed, you stupid motherfahqer. Hey, daddyfahqer, my truck is bigger than yours.

82 shots of espresso and an ascent of mount rainier will make you lose fat.

New reason why Bellevue sucks: For the second time in eight years I got pulled over for speeding. I'VE ONLY EVER BEEN PULLED OVER ON THE EAST SIDE. Bastards....... The piggy gave me a warning and not a ticket. The reason I'm sure is because god loves me..........

PERFECT. AND CORRECT.

Chocolate and sex. Happiness cures all.

Agreed. Except Bellingham has more interesting SMELLING people than Bellevue. And there is less ritsy richness........

Wind, fire, and earth. Dumb fucker.

Actually, it annoys me pretty badly too. And I really don't care for the wealth-arrogance that permeates the east side. But I'm curious; what do you drive? And do you cast the same condemnation on climbers that arrive at the trail head in an old Landcruiser or 4-Runner? Is it a "needs-based" disdain? And if so, are the needs of said climbers any more valid than those of a suburban mom who occasionally uses the SUV to take the kids and their teammates to practice?? I drive a 1989 Toyota 4-cylinder EFI, 4x4 pickup. Not exactly sure, but it gets mid-twenties gas mileage on the highway - not fantastic, I know. The answer to your question: NO. I do not disdain climbers who use their vehicles out of a NEED basis. Personally, I'm one of them. When at home in Bellingham, I usually ride a bike, walk, use my buddies homebuilt moped (that pulls 120 mpg) use the bus, and use my truck for bigger things - like climbing, or grocery shopping. Simply put, I fill up my truck about once per month with 16 gallons. Whereas there are people driving H2's in Bellevue that fill the fucking thing up every other day, with 40 gallons of gasoline! What I was trying to implying with my post was that far TOO MANY people are utterly UNCONCIOUS about how much crap they are plugging out every day. And it seems to be more prevelant on the east side (the unconcious thing). If I could afford it, and they were actually offered [!!!!] I would buy an electric car. Sustainable design and environmentally sound transportation are sort of my major side passion. Thats a entirely new and very long discussion however.....

Hey Mythos, I don't have any single worst experience, just a whole slew of SUV driving-teenage-rich f*** wanker loser-stuck up asshole, stories. Serisouly, every time I go down 405 and see these jackbutts driving their $60,000 fancy shmancy peices of crap, I think to myself "because of you, asshole, my F****ing playground is MELTING!" I try not to be too bitter though; it only hurts ME. Not them. Thanks for the spray. Hey, are you down south right now? I am..........

I know, dogs are WAY cooler.

i always wanted to fuck a nun. Pink: One word: Fleshlight you sick fucker!

Kevino, you just ruined my complete day! I now I have a MASSIVE problem........

I still have all my Jurasic Park toys. Hey Kevbone! Wanna play?!

OK, I'm just wondering now, how the HELL did a discussion about sex and rock climbing turn into a verbal religion odyssey? Leave it to the climber overthinkers to jack up a perfectly innocent discussion about fucking.

Similarities — whether of DNA, anatomy, embryonic development, or anything else — are better explained in terms of creation by a common Designer than by evolutionary relationship. The great differences between organisms are of greater significance than the similarities, and evolutionism has no explanation for these if they all are assumed to have had the same ancestor. How could these great gaps between kinds ever arise at all, by any natural process? Yeah, a single creator made it all, all right. Gadda love the self induced frontal lobotomy. How does it feel? Hey you clueless twit. Fuck you. So, you think you have it more figured out than the likes of Einstein and Steven Hawking? HUuummmm??? Dumbass. Even Einstein beleived in a way, dumbass. He was smart enough to know all this wasn't by chance. So, the quick answer to the question is that Einstein did not believe in a personal God. It is however, interesting how he arrived at that conclusion. In developing the theory of relativity, Einstein realized that the equations led to the conclusion that the universe had a beginning. He didn't like the idea of a beginning, because he thought one would have to conclude that the universe was created by God. So, he added a cosmological constant to the equation to attempt to get rid of the beginning. He said this was one of the worst mistakes of his life. Of course, the results of Edwin Hubble confirmed that the universe was expanding and had a beginning at some point in the past. So, Einstein became a deist - a believer in an impersonal creator God: "I believe in Spinoza's God who reveals himself in the orderly harmony of what exists, not in a God who concerns himself with fates and actions of human beings." "But, on the other hand, every one who is seriously involved in the pursuit of science becomes convinced that a spirit is manifest in the laws of the Universe - a spirit vastly superior to that of man, and one in the face of which we with our modest powers must feel humble. In this way the pursuit of science leads to a religious feeling of a special sort, which is indeed quite different from the religiosity of someone more naive. [c. Dukas and Hoffman]" Alright, Seahawks, you've gained some ground with me. Agreed, Einstein was a very spiritually minded physicist. I don't remember the exact quote, but it was something to the effect of him saying "the universe is too beautiful, perfect and imperfect to have been formed by pure chance". If you ask more modern thinkers about the ideas of god and creation (namely thinking of Richard Dawkins and Steven Hawking), it seems as though atheism is a bit of a cultural trend right now. I personally am not atheist, nor am I religious in any way. I find myself making this observation: the longer I live, the more I realize how infinitely complex and beautiful the world and universe is. It therefore seems logical that death is equally as mysterious. A simple blackout seems like a pretty simple and easy answer to the end of human life. I wonder that there just may be something far more interesting. Who knows. My earlier response to your post stemmed from the fact that I have a very low tolerance for people who are excessively rigid with their beliefs about creationism. I've known way too many people who have essentially stopped their intellectual development because they never question and think about the possibility that theoretical science might be on to something. cheers.

Oly, that is fucking awsome!

Similarities — whether of DNA, anatomy, embryonic development, or anything else — are better explained in terms of creation by a common Designer than by evolutionary relationship. The great differences between organisms are of greater significance than the similarities, and evolutionism has no explanation for these if they all are assumed to have had the same ancestor. How could these great gaps between kinds ever arise at all, by any natural process? Yeah, a single creator made it all, all right. Gadda love the self induced frontal lobotomy. How does it feel? Hey you clueless twit. Fuck you. So, you think you have it more figured out than the likes of Einstein and Steven Hawking? HUuummmm??? Dumbass.

I think and hope so! Yeah, yur a climber. All you need is that desperate and longful face when you are NOT climbing. Then we all know how addicted you are.....

DEMMIT CARTMEN, YOU FARTED!