KaskadskyjKozak

Exactly... but what do you expect from a 13-year-old?

in other words: we'll have better luck negotiating with them if we first label them as bad guys. KOOOKOOO!!! axis ... of ... evil redux

:lmao: :lmao: Не умничай, дурак!

always back to the politics. you lefties are pathetic

I think I'll have to ask my cousin about that. Why do you have a picture of John Kerry for your Avatar?

there are no sharp corners where my eyes are wandering

my eyes keep wandering to the upper right corner.

And to the 0-4 Saints... back-to-back fiascos. Wazzup???

Tony Blair? The "people of Iraq"? Nice list, dude. Nice cherry-picking, "dude". And yes, the people of Iraq are tolerating an intolerable situation, and trying to make peace where there is none. They aren't living in a 9 billion square foot mansion, and flying private jets all around the world, preaching a message they don't live up to (that has nothing to do with "peace").

you were his plaster caster? WTF?

Some better candidates

So are you (sometimes) with you’re consistent “glass is half full” pessimistic view! You are such a tool. glass is half full = optimist you've been told this multiple times.

it doesn't piss me off. it's just lame.

it was super fun the libbies didn't pick on you too badly, then?

the problems on that test fall into b) for me.

Look at the history of the award. Mostly they've done a good job, although in recent years it's been more and more debatable. Some years NO award was given. Can I think of someone? No. I'm sure there is someone deserving of it... or maybe not - as I noted sometimes no award was given. But Gore definitely doesn't deserve the friggin' Peace prize. At least with Carter it made sense. And, for the record, I don't think Reagan deserved it either (as others are arguing). I liked what he did, but his means were not in the spirit of the Peace Prize.

Look at the history of the award. Mostly they've done a good job, although in recent years it's been more and more debatable. Some years NO award was given. Can I think of someone? No. I'm sure there is someone deserving of it... or maybe not - as I noted sometimes no award was given. But Gore definitely doesn't deserve the friggin' Peace prize. At least with Carter it made sense.

what moral decency?

we should all be charged with war-crimes as a consequence. especially V7.

Why in god's name would anyone ever do this? That's like practicing root canals on yourself! Differential equations are kind of fun... at least the ones/classes you learn in an intro class on them in college. Then of course, you find out that only a very small subset of them are solvable with basic, easy techniques...

That makes me feel better. :-) At one point I could have struggled through some of those and did OK - no superstar that's for sure. These days, the brain has far too many cobwebs...

Nonsense. May be, may be, whatever. And piss off, jizz-gargler, I don't listen to Rush.

Dude, read the news.

(from Wikipedia) Nobel. According to Nobel's will, the Peace Prize should be awarded "to the person who shall have done the most or the best work for fraternity between the nations, for the abolition or reduction of standing armies and for the holding and promotion of peace congresses". Gore did none of that. Lame.

Excuse: DeChristo won't be there.