KaskadskyjKozak

Post of the day! For sure! :lmao: :lmao: Seahawks familiy! and you don't even show up on the photo... you're well off to the left, somewhere between amoebas and slime-mold.

STFU, you Canuck piece of shit, ass-eating fuck wad.

Unlock the thread. Ban Seahawks for a week. It will then die on its own accord.

Thank you. Amen. Merry Christmas. Some people need to learn that you don't need to response to every damn post ad nauseaum. TTK and Seahawks seem to top that list. Merry Christmas to you too, and a Happy New Year! (be safe!)

Funny how you will believe scientific theory saying fossilization is impossible but not science saying the Earth is 4 billion years old. Cognitive dissonance? I guess you are too dumb to get it. Can you prove fossilization. Yes and you can prove how long it takes. Something 60 -70 million supposedly years old would have 0% cells. No if and or buts. But hey it does. So we have to come up with a new theory to debunk this. 0 + 0 = 0 Something doesn't come from nothing. Basic laws. 1) Mary finds some 65 million year old blood cells inside a dinosaur bone 2) Mary suggests that these blood cells have been preserved through the fosslization process 3) Fossilization theory does not discount this, but it is an unexpected result. Offering possibilities for more exciting discoveries. 4) Mouthbreathing Bible thumpers (probably reading Bible looking for justifications for incest) cannot understand Mary's work. 5. and idiots can't admit that maybe there thinking was wrong becuase they are so much into there huminstic religion that it doesn't allow any other thought. SEAHAWKS YOU HAVE EXCEEDED THE QUOTA FOR MAXIMUM POSTS IN A THREAD. STFU AND GO DO SOMETHING ELSE.

Hey gotta compliment you on actually backing up a post with a pertinent link. It is much better than spewing your usual ill tempered rhetoric. go wash your ass, clownpuncher. Merry Christmas. I gave you an easy avenue for a angry vent. Hope it helped you feel better. sorry, bud, but I'm not angry - just having fun! and Merry Christmas to you! Христос раждається!

bugger off poser. your head is way too big for what you actually can do and have done. as for Tvash, you and he should hang out. you are two assholes that are perfect for one another.

What do you wear to keep the head of manhood from freezing? I don't seem to have a good enough idea to have a comfortable ride. I don't have that problem. For me it's a battle between a cold head (not that head!) and numb fingers or overheating/sweating. Typically I wear long sleeves, a regular biking jersey, regulay padded pants and no skull cap and no jacket. If the temps are below 40, I often wear a jacket for the ride in to Seattle, but no jacket going home, even if it is as cold as 35. I just pedal harder.

Hey gotta compliment you on actually backing up a post with a pertinent link. It is much better than spewing your usual ill tempered rhetoric. go wash your ass, clownpuncher.

Wrong. Although macro-evolution might have problems and I can see how people don't want to accept it outright, the fact is that humans have been around more than 6000 years - it's more like 100,000 - in the modern form. This is provable via carbon-dating. And there are fossils of animals that existed here hundreds of millions of years ago. I'm glad the forum wasted hundred of posts arguing with you about macro-evolution when they could have cut to the chase a lot quicker (as I did). I conclude by citing Sexy Cocoa... d...a... Source and proof? You've gotta be kidding, right? linky

Wrong. Although macro-evolution might have problems and I can see how people don't want to accept it outright, the fact is that humans have been around more than 6000 years - it's more like 100,000 - in the modern form. This is provable via carbon-dating. And there are fossils of animals that existed here hundreds of millions of years ago. I'm glad the forum wasted hundred of posts arguing with you about macro-evolution when they could have cut to the chase a lot quicker (as I did). I conclude by citing Sexy Cocoa... d...a...

I looked outside this morning. Bike or not to bike. I wanted to bike - frost was everywhere. I donned my down coat and walked up and down the street testing the grippiness of the asphalt. Mostly good, but some slippery parts. Woah, a frozen puddle. Not good. It felt to be above freezing. Maybe it's OK to bike? I'm biking. No. Wait, I don't want to eat shit on the mercer slough, or the hill down Factoria. Screw it, I'm driving. I'm a planet killer.

Questions for you SH: 1) how old is planet Earth? 2) how long have men - in their current form - existed on planet Earth? 3) upon what do you base your answers to these questions? My curiosity seeks answers but I beleive these questions have nothing to do with spirituality except in as much as a person might mistake religion for spirituality. The two are not necessarily intertwined (sadly). I didn't ask you.

No surprise there. Empress Theodora of the 11th century had the Pope assasinated because he would not go along with her wishes. She then instated her own Pope. It was then that reincarnation was removed as an option for Christians. Many other bizzarre tidbits were changed. Her Pope must be in Hell. Unless she was God's servant in which case the previous Pope is in hell. But that would condone assasination so probably not. Maybe they are all in Hell for making Christianity BOOK based when the teachings of Jesus clearly speak out against basing your salvation on a "code". No Feck. Christians are not any closer to heaven than non-christians unless they continually admit their mistakes and guenuineley attempt to change/repent. It is not over until you are sizzling or basking. Bug, I don't know about those specific points of history. I use extreem caution about saying who will or will not, or who is or is not in Hell or Heaven. I find it more important to concentrate on what I am doing than on what others are doing or have done. The point is if I get all caught up in the question of who is going to heaven or hell, then I am makeing two mistakes; first final condemnation and salvation are issued from GOD and not me, and secondly I miss the oppertunity to help HERE and NOW becouse I am to caught up in theologic abstracts, and miss out completely. I think we agree; "No Feck. Christians are not any closer to heaven than non-christians unless they continually admit their mistakes and guenuineley attempt to change/repent. It is not over until you are sizzling or basking." Once again Feck repeats a message so often cited and attributed to Christians (with the broadest brush strokes), which really is relatively rarely actually voiced. Definitely I've never heard there fire and brimstone messages from any Church I have been in. Usually sin is addressed as something we all commit, and requires personal examination of conscience. But hey, keep on attacking all those Christians for their sins... wait, isn't that what you are saying that they do?

When my Laphroaig is gone (I've got the 15 year), I may try the Lagavulin 16 year. It's also a hard-core Islay, but has different qualities - like all good scotch. I'm learning that the Scotch world is like a whole world of whisky unto itself - so many varieties, flavors, and styles. And so little time and money. :-)

Questions for you SH: 1) how old is planet Earth? 2) how long have men - in their current form - existed on planet Earth? 3) upon what do you base your answers to these questions?

Wrong on all counts, buddy. Again you miss the point, and make a lot of ASSumptions. 1) i took an AP course in biology at a premier public school in the shadow of Stanford University. Many of our teachers had Ph.D.s, and many students were children of Stanford alumni. An AP course is a COLLEGE-level course, not high-school, BTW. And I scored a 5. 2) we are discussing MACRO-evolution. It *is* a side-show of sorts. Trust me, it is a small part of a biology course, where you learn about the taxonomy of living organisms, DNA/genetics, cell-structure and function, mammalian anatomy (like how TTK's titties manufacture milk), and so on. Darwin and his theory constitute a few chapters, and are covered very quickly. A lot of that material is very "fluffy" compared to the hard-core study of ribosomes, meiosis/mitosis, DNA transcription, etc. While I may believe it is probably true, I certainly see issues with it being perfect and provable. There's a lot of holes. And don't start about micro- proving macro-. And you can learn the former without buying into the later AND avoid a lot of this controversy. 3) I worked in biotech for 9 years, including projects directly related to DNA sequencing, genotyping, homology searching, model organisms and the like, so I don't need your stupid references to "learning material".

Thanks for the review! I'll have to pick some up when my Jameson 1780 is out. Have you seen the show "The Thirsty Traveller"? Recently I saw an episode where the host toured Scotland, and stopped on the island of Islay. He swung by the Laphroaig refinery and tried a pour. The dude visibly winced, said "Now that's a man's drink", and then excused himself to "enjoy" the drink in silence - "it grabs your attention and makes you want to enjoy the drink". I wonder if he dumped it out? Anyways, that's a hardcore scotch for true lovers of peaty smoky malt. :-) I've got Taliskers on my Christmas list... hope to get a bottle...

We've observed blackholes...we have not observed an experiment where life was spontaneously created by a chemical reaction to my knowledge. If evolution is a fact it still doesn't disprove the existence of God. Neither does retroviral DNA insertions, the laws of gravity, quarks, people with vestigal tails, the dinosaurs, galaxies a hundred thousand light years away, string theory, or even TTK's hermaphroditic titties. An omnipotent Creator can of course have created the laws of nature that science observes, and science does not disprove the Creator. As for the question of why teach evolution in secondary school - Eric B is 100% correct. It's not that damn important. The fact is our public education system sucks ass as it is, and we would do well to focus on the basics anyway, and evolution is a small subject in a large ocean of knowledge that should be taught. Personally, I studied evolution in 10th grade as a part of AP Biology, and even then it was one very small part of a large curriculum. Moreover, to say we must teach it because it is science is nonsense, and a non sequitur. We can teach whatever the hell we want to teach and that should be decided at the local level. And, BTW, I'll add that if we want our kids to learn to think critically, they need to actually be faced with choices that they have to argue both sides of and come to their own conclusion - not be force-fed totalitarian-style propaganda like you evolution-science-worshipers are so bent on. It's a pattern I see all to frequently with your type - ranging from social issues , history, political policy, and on to science. I must only conclude that your inflexible, knee-jerk defensiveness is rooted in, umm, insecurity and weakness.

Perfect. You look exactly as I picture you from your posts: like a pathetic dufus.

Can't hate what you don't believe in, amigo. Sorry to dissappoint. You believe in Him, but deny it, and for some reason hate Him for creating you and the world as it is.

See, I was right, you HATE God. Deny it all you want. As for the last sentence - it describes YOU perfectly.

My understanding is that Christmas is celebrated at this date because a Christian emperor way back in Roman days wanted to tone down the out of control partying associated with the Winter Solstice. He fixed his "problem" by turning it into a religious holiday. Roman Emperor? These Holy Days/Feast days/Saints Days almost all are chosen to coincide with existing pagan celebrations to replace them and make a transition for the local people to Christianity easier. And Christmas was celebrated as a Mardi Gras-style bacchanialan party well into the middle ages and renaissance and beyond. Just saw a program on it tonight in fact. In England for example it was like this into the 1800's, and in the US as well. Made a lot of upper-class folks quite nervous as the partying often turned into riots. The way we celebrate Christmas now is inherited from the Victorian era...

Are we surprised that our ankle-biting, puerile, little snot-nosed teenager, "No. 13", delurked to respond to one of my posts? No we are not. You have nothing to say without me. Query your posting history and a majority of it is in direct response or indirect response to what I post. I lead; you follow. As it should be. Poor, jealous, little Beta. now go run along and study some more. eventually you will graduate from jr. high...maybe. Now go lick sack.

TTK....how is it that evolution is the most successfully tested theory in all of science? Where did you get that gem? HE LOOKS IN THE MIRROR. THE PROOF IS INCONTROVERTIBLE! MUST I ONCE AGAIN PROVIDE THE EVIDENCE???