I know a lot of "poor" people with a fishing boat, 2 cars, a house, and the funds to buy gasoline, cigarettes, and plenty of beer.
But they can't afford health insurance.
You're certainly as narcissistic, and hopeless as Nero.
No sir. Unlike you, I'm just never disappointed.
Hey, how's the anger management going?
keep looking for diversions to keep your mind off the truth.
Nope. I'm questioning your term "transfer payment."
Nope, you're playing lawyer's games. As usual. This is why FW gets tired of engaging w/ you in a discussion, as do I.
Are you trying to convince me that VA benefits should be cut or restricted, or dependent on combat service or years of duty? Try hard enough, and maybe I could agree with you on that.
If you can't see the difference between service in military and its concomitant benefits and simply existing, then you're in the same intellectual bin as kboner.
Good idea. Start with Kboner.
No I'm thinking you, buddy boy. You haven't really done shit for this country, have you?
We might be able to appease the terrorists with periodic blood sacrifices. You could serve this country quite well in this capacity. I'd be willing to chip in for the one-way plane ticket - a great service for this country.
I thought you said that government provision of healthcare services = socialism.
Quit being obtuse.
VA benefits are not a transfer payment or wealth distribution, they are payment for services rendered to our nation.
Oh I disagree, I think we should close down all the military hospitals right now. If those veterans want medical treatment they should get a better job and buy insurance and stop sponging off all us hardworking taxpayers.
VA Benefits are NOT socialism. They were paid for by service to our country as part of the "benefits package", if you will. This service is NOT a transfer payment.
"Universal health care" OTOH is all about taking money from one group of people giving it to another - FOR NO REASON OTHER THAN THEIR RESIDENCY/CITIZENSHIP. They did nothing to earn this benefit, unlike our veterans.
Try again - your argument sucks.
The interference will be some half-assed "solution", an empty gesture which solves nothing, but gives the public the impression of an accomplishment. That's what we are headed for with this. The result will be more of a cluster-f***, as usual.
Right, there's a bunch of confusion and bullshit rhetoric, and what we'll see is more government meddling and a more f-d up system than what we already have.
Government provided services in a single-payer system = socialism.
Make up whatever euphemisms you want, it's still socialism. Why are you afraid of this word? It's what you want. Embrace it!
A "subsidy" IS redistribution of wealth. The gov't collects the money from one group of people and hands it off to another. Duh.
Requires people to buy insurance? What a joke. I thought the insurance companies were part of the problem. Forcing people who are uninsured to buy insurance is tyranny at a minimum and only contributes to the problem
What I see most cc.com'ers talking about is a "single payer" system - where the gov't is the payer. There is no insurance company. The gov'e pays the medical bills, funded by tax dollars. And certain Americans (taxpayers) will be footing the bill for everyone. Redistribution of wealth.