KaskadskyjKozak

I welcome debate with serious dissenters who believe in our country and its system of government and wish to improve it. Your motives are not to improve this country, but overthrow our system of government, and abolish freedoms. In the Senate, Lieberman supported the Patriot Act and its renewal, and he's voted in favor of a measure to expand the government's domestic surveillance authority. 5K, is this a way of abolishing freedoms? You suggest Lieberman would be a fine addition to the cabinet - what! No democrats supported the PA and its renewal? Hmm? And I don't buy the BS that the PA is some kind of horrible expansion of gov't. Sorry. And I'm not about to go into some huge tangent on this subject. It's been beat to death on this site.

That's EXACTLY what this country needs more of!

I welcome debate with serious dissenters who believe in our country and its system of government and wish to improve it. Your motives are not to improve this country, but overthrow our system of government, and abolish freedoms.

Lieberman is a good American, and a maverick in his own right - going against his own party, which cost him their support in his last election bid. Nevertheless, he won. I don't agree with him on many issues - like it or not, he is fundamentally a Democrat. But I respect him. He'd make a fine member of the McCain-Palin administration.

You're a nut-ball left-winger. Everything that you argue is "bad" in this country is going to be tinged with Marxist red. Sorry, dude, but that's the fact.

Yes, it is very easy to oppose a commie agenda.

The country will be better off with anyone who opposes your kind of "agenda"

Obama is an empty suit. McCain is a real leader. And your party will lose again. I can't wait to celebrate.

Can't figure out why this is important. There are certainly plenty of morons out there "authoring legislation". Remember Tim Eyman? He is not a leader with any accomplishments. He has absolutely NO track record except winning elections.

Is she a pit-bull?

Are you serious? Gore-Lieberman was 8 short years ago. They lost to W in a bitterly-contested debate. And now Lieberman will likely be on the cabinet of the next R administration? Probably as Secretary of Defence or of State.

Let's start with McCain-Finegold. Not a popular thing for McCain to do, and it pissed off his party. And, Obama, has done what to show he is a leader - especially transcending his own party? What legislation has HE authored? *crickets*

Yeah, those people clinging to they religion. Go with that message Prole, please do.

Ah, passing our "wealth" to future generations! Yeah, vote for Obama - so he can spend even MORE of our kids' money, while f-ing up the rest of the country.

you have plenty of your own to join in on spray.

Yes, and McCain has repeatedly gone against his own party and pissed off the establishment. That's why he got screwed in his Presidential aspirations in 2000. He's a maverick to the core and will shake up the status quo for the next 4 years. Okay, if he is a maverick to the core - who would he be picking for his cabinet? It is not just McCain you are voting for but the whole republican ball of wax! Lieberman will be in his cabinet. You know, the guy who was on the DEMOCRATIC ticket 8 short years ago. No significance there at all.

I think Obama is about to get slammed.

Your link doesn't work pp.

Yes, and McCain has repeatedly gone against his own party and pissed off the establishment. That's why he got screwed in his Presidential aspirations in 2000. He's a maverick to the core and will shake up the status quo for the next 4 years.

Oh, you mean the guy who jacked up taxes? The guy who considered you and I his magic piggy bank? Obama thinks the same way.

"A self-described libertarian Republican, Greenspan has a reputation for being wary of giving the government extra powers." Sounds like a perfect American to me. I'll bet he's opposed to Obama's health care plan too. Which would further his credibility as a real American.

Maverick: One that refuses to abide by the dictates of or resists adherence to a group; a dissenter. adj. Being independent in thought and action or exhibiting such independence: maverick politicians; a maverick decision. Of course a group think, herd-instinct, lemming, liberal sheeple would see no appeal in this.

Maverick

The cc.com peanut gallery is in no position to mock others' typographical errors.

175, as usual