KaskadskyjKozak

You've told us multiple times. Nobody is impressed.

Or numerous individuals engaging in dozens of acts of violence inspired by an identical mode of expression in the last three years. BTW, what should happen to these perpetrators, should they be found guilty in a court of law? Will they be excused by libtards for having a bad childhood, a genetic flaw, not enough hugs from Mommie, etc? Just curious, Prole.

Wow! "Forever"?!?!?! That's like a really long time. And to think, Obama heads up this security state!

Again, violent threats are not protected speech. They have long been a crime. Violent threat - you mean like you opining on Spray how someone should have put a bullet in Bush's head? Rephrased, but the original post, like yours: not a threat. Grammar is difficult for some, I realize. And the audience size here? What, 10 people, max? Um, yeah, right. You're so full of shit.

Or, in your case, the Stay-Puft Marshmallow Man in Ghostbusters.

Again, violent threats are not protected speech. They have long been a crime. Violent threat - you mean like you opining on Spray how someone should have put a bullet in Bush's head?

It's not necessary to find an airtight, direct, "card carrying membership" in the John Birch Society kind of link between Jared Loughner and Tea Party to conclude that his acts follow a pattern of growing right-wing anti-government violence in America. In addition, his few public statements clearly show that his "thinking" was heavily influenced by the rightwing rhetoric so readily available in his community. You're one of the delusional morons.

that's why the electorate voted in Obama?

LOL. Gotta love the snow pack this year though. :-)

Yeah, you really know how to treat a friend - we can see that. And you call others "sociopath".

Disagree with TTK and you are "stupid" and have no "intellect". Even if you were/are friends and have agreed on a myriad of issues in the past. Fucking sociopath.

Wrong. Here you go, dummy: Rightwing Extremism: US Department of Homeland Security Assessment, 2009 So, *that's* your excuse for buying a hand gun?

Wrong. I like how you're so dumb. It makes this place fun. Dumb enough to think I need to pack a weapon 'cos I'm gonna live in SCARY Everett? That kind of dumb?

Yeah, right, he's just a school teacher. Never mind.

Wrong.

Left-wingers like Ivan regularly wish for the deaths of their political adversaries. After all "they deserve it". MOST Left-wingers don't wish for this anymore than MOST right-wingers do. These sort of generalized, polemic, personalized "us-vs-them" attacks that I'm decrying. Do you really thing Ivan regularly wishes for the deaths of his political adversities? Sigh. I didn't say MOST, you did; I said "like Ivan". TTK, Choada-Boy, and Ivan have all expressed a desire for certain right-wing politicians and commentators to be killed.

How's the skiing coming along this year Rudy?

Left-wingers like Ivan regularly wish for the deaths of their political adversaries. After all "they deserve it". And yet these same blowhards go on and on about how the *other* side is calling for the deaths of the "other", and are the ones who are over the top in their rhetoric, etc, etc.

As opposed to you?

There you go - proof positive - thanks, Ivan!

according to ttk and j_b, yes something more like what Rob is saying

Yes. The next step would be to identify the source of the vast majority of paranoid, conspiratorial rhetoric that this guy picked up on. look in the mirror, and include j_b and kevbone in that introspection you can start with the 9/11 denial thread

that's pretty much in line with what Rob was saying

Meanwhile we have our posters like ttk who once opined that someone "should put a bullet" into Bush's head, not to mention Choada boy's repeated death wishes for various right-of-center politicians.

What we need is the government to apply some reasonable restrictions on speech, right j_b? Only on speech to the right of him - in other words to the right of Joseph Stalin.