KaskadskyjKozak

LOL, I'd leave it on for a bit man.....maybe double up on the thickness.....this shit might rub off joblo and get all over one of us....could go real bad. The chart was from 1976 and I wouldn't ever bet against Joseph. And it doesn't take much Googling to see that this set of myths around the Federal Reserve Bank is all over the place - as are myth-debunking sites that address this little gem. And yes there is little "anti-smiting" involved in the propagation of this myth but a lot of anti-semitism.

that is THE POINT. No the point is on your hat!

everyone put on your tin foil hat!

Er hat ein krankes Gehirn.

Ah, late to the party, but I want to point out the "lad" goes with the britticism "barking mad." Would it work better for you if I declare that you're a whole bag of nuts? I'm not sure about a whole bag of nuts, but he's definitely a few fries short of a happy meal...

You are not God, so it doesn't matter if you are anti-smite.

Especially when you can be as subjective as you wish doing the latter and cherry pick both your data set and your "conclusions"!

they exist, and they cost 100 quadrillion dollars. The Rottenchild's worked with the Illuminati to secretly fund this program.

right, you want to ignore data that invalidates your conclusions and focus only on those with which to foist your agenda on others.

Trillion-dollar fighter jets!

We should tell them that Mr. Weiner sent pics of his weener to their hottest women, causing them to run away from their smelly husbands. They can launch a thousand ships to invade us, which we can sink with our trillion dollar fighters.

Smelly poos? BO? Body hair? All problems that j_bot is suffering from.

Define a living wage - esp. one that can actually be supported by the economy. You can't.

I'd consider it if you actually made an argument (one that justified a reply). In other words, "hand waving" only.

What do you think flavors feta, eh?

In the case of Greece 200 will suffice. We should do a remake movie of 300 as a documentary. LOLZ

Define a "living wage", quantitatively for say, a family of 4 in the metro Seattle area in 2011 dollars. Then define how you would achieve such a wage for all while preserving a balanced budget and sound economy.

Tax evasion or tax avoidance? They are two very different animals.

Kind of like the Mariners.

progressives have no sense of humor

Try harder to be funny.

You regressives are all alike with your absence of any sense of humor. Must be a genetic defect.

still no response on topic from Attila. There is no such thing as "on topic" on a flame-forum of a climbing web site you pathetic brain-dead freak.

what a pathetic clown. You spent the last 2 years chasing me around to verbally abuse me and rarely commenting on subject and this is what you come up with? You are the typical wingnut who accuses his opponents of what he does systematically. How can you even look at yourself in the mirror? Douchebag. 1)You are not a serious person to debate with (and you are mentally ill to boot). 2)All you want to do is harp on the same boring political bullshit endlessly. This is a climbing site, you moron.

My point when mentioning payroll and regressive taxes was to show that many more people pay taxes despite what your graph showed. It's a classic regressive talking point to only discuss federal income tax as if that was the only way people were taxed, which it isn't. Your "real hourly compensation" doesn't accurately account for real costs of living. One income family used to make the ends meet whereas many 2 income families can't make ends meet today. Their standard of living isn't higher than it used to be either (as shown by Warren's study among other evidence), so there is something wrong with your data, which isn't too surprising considering how many time methodologies have been tweaked to make numbers look better by successive administrations. but none of the above addresses the salient points of my post above: inequalities that are as large as during the age of robber barons, trillions in profit not being taxed, paltry marginal rate of taxation, federal spending on many other things than the "welfare state", etc ... j_bot's reply as usual: - you're wrong - I'll rephrase that you are wrong by making claims with no backing data other than "because I said so" - chuck in a few insults - include a few comments critical of administrations, policies, and historical situations he disagrees with, but are not directly related to the points being raised Yes, indeed, substantive debate of the 'bot. He's really walking the walk!