KaskadskyjKozak

Bush. Barry.

meh. havne't seen enough to make me think its far out of bounds - the idea was to stoke green energy, so of course it'd involve handing out cash. is there strong evidence it was handed out to folks for purely corrupt purposes? was bho given these dudes cash that they were kicking back? or was he guilty of no more than false hopes that this would help get folks back to work, like a president should? Ivan's waiting for all the evidence to surface first. Don't rush to judgement!!!

AS if advocating for social policy was comparable to telling someone who, when and how to fuck. But keep making an ass of yourself. Pontificating totalitarian douche-nozzles like you go far beyond dictating just that one aspect of a person's life.

Funny they're not saying that about Cain. He is black, though. Black Gold. "We're electing a president not a Pope..."

I do too but not for his extra-marital dallying. He never claimed to be holier than thou on the family front like conservative hypocrites do almost all the time. The Clinton-is-a sex-machine witch hunt was also an attempt by neanderthals to shove their values down our throats. As opposed to meddling social engineers like yourself shoving your values down our throats.

Can I call in and ask you why you have soooooo many posts on this site? "Who do you prefer as the front man of Van Halen?" "Pamela Lee - with or without implants?"

Clinton was accused of sexual harassment you dipshit. and there was a huge fucking settlement, BTW Jones' story has gold digger written all over (she waited for 3 years and there was a witness who contradicted her), which is certainly not the case for Cain. But whatever, I certainly don't have the stomach to dig into that drivel. The rationalization of the retarded continues. Move along... no hypocrisy to see here!

Cain refused to give the facts, which naturally allowed to speculate he was hiding something. The crimes in your examples weren't about marital infidelity. Trial in the court of public opinion! Guilty... you must be hiding something. Man you are a joke. Kathleen Willey accused Clinton of rape... he refused to give facts... GUILTY AS CHARGED

Cain refused to give the facts, which naturally allowed to speculate he was hiding something. The crimes in your examples weren't about marital infidelity. Trial in the court of public opinion! Guilty... you must be hiding something. Man you are a joke.

Cain refused to give the facts, which naturally allowed to speculate he was hiding something. The crimes in your examples weren't about marital infidelity. Clinton was accused of sexual harassment you dipshit. and there was a huge fucking settlement, BTW

Don't worry Ivan, I know you wallow in the gutter knowingly. Your bear-claw-guzzling friend's feigning moral outrage is just fucking laughable, especially in light of all his heros recent marital downfalls and shortcomings (Edwards, Gore, Clinton). Not as exciting as Diamond Dave's hairy chest or Pamela Lee's implants, I know, boner, but do try to expand a bit.

"innocent until proven guilty" "we must wait until all the facts are known" and crimes were associated with my examples, btw

Don't worry Ivan, I know you wallow in the gutter knowingly. Your bear-claw-guzzling friend's feigning moral outrage is just fucking laughable, especially in light of all his heros recent marital downfalls and shortcomings (Edwards, Gore, Clinton).

Sangre de Christo, bishes

Or however many nights that was. Two and counting... ...but I'm sure they were isolated incidents. Yeah. They always are. like Lewinsky, Jones, Flowers... isolated "but we're electing a president not a pope!" "censure and move on!" Fucking hypocritical douchenozzle libtards

Of course not. It's only an "issue" when a Republican is in the WH. Duh.

Are you serious? He has a 43% approval rating, we have 9% unemployment and most importantly, the election is still a year out. Yea, and given that, plus the early game stage, we still have this, not the make-believe thing you posted. http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2012/president/president_obama_vs_republican_candidates.html I'll take a bet on Obama now, no problem. Though last time I did this and won PP welched on me. Barry will win. He's got a lock - you don't even need to come out and vote. Just throw away your ballot!

but it's the NY TIMES! You have to tweak the parameters pretty far for Bachman to win, but whatever, Porter.

Douche. You signed your post with no text/commentary.

Probably so. Rob is a cunning linguist.

Are you serious? He has a 43% approval rating, we have 9% unemployment and most importantly, the election is still a year out. Yeah, but look who the GOP is trying to get to run against him. Cain? Perry? ARE YOU SERIOUS??? I actually think the GOP *wants* obama to win. He gives the republicans everything they want, and a republican president would only unite a democratic opposition, which is currently still licking Obama's palm. Obama staying in office is the best possible thing that could happen to the GOP. (and the banks) Follow the link I posted. Tweak Barry's approval rating. Tweak economic growth. Even Cain could win according to that model.

Linky Nice....they dont even list Ron Paul. Shit, dude, they left David Lee Roth off there too! WTF??

Are you serious? He has a 43% approval rating, we have 9% unemployment and most importantly, the election is still a year out.

that would be cool