Jump to content

KaskadskyjKozak

Members
  • Posts

    17291
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    21

Everything posted by KaskadskyjKozak

  1. Yeah, there's no photos of Diamond Dave, a thonged rhino, or fake breasts. WTF?!
  2. Yeah, this thread is about eating/drinking shit and puking. I saw a guy drink a glass of water with a goldfish, puke it backinto the glass, alive. This predated Jackass by over a decade. Then there was the guy that chugged a glass of chew spit (his own), with a raw egg on top for shits and giggles. The project vomit smelled so bad I almost lost it.
  3. wait! you were there too! can't claim to have been anythign other than a bystander - the instict to test one's ability to consume revolting things is happily one i seem to have evolved away from I saw a guy attempt a John Belushi and chug a fifth of JD in one long chug. He immediately grabbed a garbage can and puked so hard he burst the blood vessels in both eyes. For the next week he walked around with blood red, demonic eyes.
  4. Recommendation: Appleton Estate amber rum Capt. Morgans...
  5. gusano rojo
  6. awesome.
  7. three miles of beer cups lined in a row? in 20 min? holy shit!
  8. Freshiez! :-)
  9. One of my many convictions is that I don't release personal information. Nor do I commit funds over the telephone. Are you now to be the arbiter of my convictions as well?? To judge what are, and are not, legitimate convictions? Ad hominem, blah blah, but Grandma's still got bigger ballz. She's willing to be active in an important process of reform, even at the risk of identity theft (which has, do date, never occurred with petition signatures). You've decided that your fear of identity theft trumps participating in the petition process. Grandma is simply braver in that regard. Them's just the facts, dood. Call it an attack. I call it an observation. Whut-evuh... I play my part in the process of reform, I just board the train at the next station. Do you have some sort of problem with the manner in which I participate in my government? Are you now to be the arbiter of how I discharge my citizenship, as well as what convictions I may be allowed to hold? Jeezus, Pat, get a hold of yourself! Not everyone practices their citizenship in the same manner as you. Allow for a difference of opinion, ferchrissakes. Ooh, and next he'll tell you you are stealing from your employer, Sobo. Mess with a sociopath and that's what to expect.
  10. LOL. Funny how you never say that to your buddy rob, j_b or Ivan, or... Keep trying though - I really don't care a wit for what a sociopath like you expects or wants from others.
  11. Still smarting from Jim's utter annihilation of you yesterday, eh, j-bot?
  12. Why would you do that? Disagree with the local sociopath and he'll drop straight to insults.
  13. We've always known you prefer snails to oysters. NTTAWWT
  14. as an aside, i though i recall from my boy scout days that it is in fact disrespectful to turn a flag into a piece of apparel? Abby Hoffmann caught a lot of shit for his American flag shirt in the early 70s. sure did, and thus my confusion at how, since then, all super-duper patriotic americans gotta have a flag on their hat, beltbuckle, tit, whatever - especially the teaparty types who bring the total flag custom to its logical extreme. Don't forget the ridiculous, obligatory, post-9/11 lapel pin...
  15. Just think how much tax revenue could be raised right now at all the OWS protests if legal weed was being sold at park-side vending stands. Lost opportunity....
  16. Because they are all dumbasses.
  17. as an aside, i though i recall from my boy scout days that it is in fact disrespectful to turn a flag into a piece of apparel? in other words, wearing a flag patch on a uniform is cool, but making a shirt out a flag or of what appears to be a flag is not. no difference to me, mind ye, red n white horizontal strips make me look too goddamn chubby Right, but I don't recall the story about them making a flag into a shirt.
  18. Racial tensions aside, in my opinion this should be no different than allowing the WBC folks' the right to protest at funerals. I don't like the decision in this (CA high school) case, cuz it's still totally a free speech issue to me. The American-flag-wearing students should not have been forced to remove their shirts. Looks to me like the school administration kowtowed to the Latino student population to avoid an altercation. That's a pretty poor motivational basis, if you ask me. I know that the decisions reached in Snyder v Phelps and the CA high school flap were made by two different courts, but I see a distinct lack on consistency in these two rulings as they currently stand. It's OK for the WBC to drag out signs and banners and protest loudly, condemning GLBTs in a most flagrant and insensitive manner, in effect endorsing hate speech. Yet, it's not OK for students to wear a T-shirt with an imprint of an American flag upon it on a day wherein another culture celebrates its national heritage. The question to ask oneself here is this: "Were any Latino students who wore T-shirts espousing their national heritage also required to turn their shirts inside out?" If the answer to that question is "no", then this is a distinct case of discrimination and the court's decision is flawed. Heaven forbid that American students in America at an American school should dare to wear a shirt depicted an American flag.
  19. crickets
  20. Unions paid independent scholars to do a study which is far cry from "scholars" working for a think tank entirely financed by corporations. AEI is a propaganda outfit and one of the worse. Nothing more. Oh, now I see. Academics paid by AEI - bias. Academics paid by Union - no bias. There is clarity. No, no, no, Jim. Can't you read, you corporate shill?!? Unions paid scholars, not "scholars". Get it? And the unions paid *independent* scholars! More clear? And the unions just paid them. But AEI is a *think tank*!! Get it - the loaded term - it really makes the point! And this *think tank* ENTIRELY financed the "scholars". ENTIRELY! They didn't just pay them, they financed them. Entirely. Learn to read, f-wit!
  21. Fixed your bias. Sounds pretty much analogous, dipshit.
  22. fire some administrators and/or cut some high-end pensions and you could finance that.
  23. His anecdotal experiences are far more useful than your blathering.
  24. ...as opposed to your incessant spew of verbal diarrhea effecting any change in government.
×
×
  • Create New...