While Kerry tries to build the war hero image and is putting his 'band of brothers' on tour, the right is of course countering with a lot of information showing Kerry in an extremely unflattering light during his 4 months in Vietnam.
Unfortunately if you just listen to the major networks or read newspapers, you are left with the impression that this is politics as usual. But if you dig deeper, there is actually a lot of information, in the form of written and filmed interviews with veterans who were right there with him---who saw the action that he was subsequently decorated for, who gave him medical treatment, etc. Damn if those accounts aren't specific and indicting.
For what it's worth,I've been hearing this kind of chatter since the primaries, from several different vets of varying polical views. Yes, it's true that a lot of vets feel betrayed by Kerry, seeing his antiwar rhetoric after his tour as behavior akin to Jane Fonda's. But the firsthand accounts, from peers and superiors, of his experience and conduct during combat versus his own account of the same are pretty damning. The conclusion that I have to draw after wading through some of the first-hand accounts is: On his war record, Kerry is a liar and a poseur.
No question that Bush was playing fratboy in the TX guard while the war was going on. (And I am personally not a Bush fan.) But that doesn't somehow offset what appears to be an egregious falsehood that Kerry is riding high on in his campaign. If his record is as many of his peers are stating, this is an insult to all those whose efforts there were heroic.
Dig around for yourself, and look at the personal testimonies of those who were there.