
Fairweather
Members-
Posts
8874 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
9
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by Fairweather
-
As Above, PURE POLITICS...NOTHING TO DO WITH CLIMBING: Nancy Pilosi will likely take over for Gephart thereby taking the Democrat Party even farther to the left at a time when the American public is trending center/slightly right-of-center. While her appointment as house minority leader is sure to make some of the lefties here on CC.Com happy, it will bring even more moderates into the Republican camp. There is even talk of one or two Democratic defections in the house. Things are looking good for Republicans long-term. (I'll bet Mondale is breathing a BIG sigh of relief today. Being in the senate minority wasn't part of the deal they promised him.) I suspect Democrats will be even more nasty and vitriolic than they usually are during the next two years. As for Washington State: Democrats have brought us the highest unemployment in the nation, driven Boeing to Chicago, and done NOTHING for education. Thanks. I-51 was a JOKE...Never had a chance. I-776 will be ruled unconstitutional, but it gave the people of WA a chance to vent their frustration with Sound Transit's $5,000-an-inch light rail and their constant scheming and deceit. [ 11-06-2002, 10:51 PM: Message edited by: Fairweather ]
-
Stefan, I have read your trip reports here and on the old WTA website over the years. They have always been very inspirational. (Especially your Olympic Mountain trips.) Here's wishing you a speedy and complete recovery! Brian
-
quote: Originally posted by carolyn: quote:Originally posted by Greg W: Goes without saying, bro. Way I heard it Wellstone's challenger was giving him a run for his money. It was close, but he was pulling ahead (wellstone, that is) and most likely would have won. Its been really sad and crazy around here with everything going on...the memorial service, media, mondale, absentee ballots... our lovely governor! Should make for an interesting election day! And DFA's conspiracy theory?!?! Dont think the thought hasnt been passed around over here...again...and again...and again! I lean more toward pilot error myself. Still, the weather wasnt that bad...kind of strange. Cant blame one to wonder otherwise! "Memorial Service"? More like a deceitful way to get 3 hours of free local airtime for a political rally. No shame, Democrats. Looks like Jesse will get the last laugh though....
-
TR: Observation Rock/High Caliber Rifles
Fairweather replied to COL._Von_Spanker's topic in Mount Rainier NP
Since shooting at "unoccupied" cars seems to be a favorite redneck pastime, I would carry a hand written, cardboard sign to put in my car window at night, that reads: "VEHICLE OCCUPIED". If these idiots knew your vehicle was occupied, this elevates them "murderer" status. This was no small crime. Fucking idiots! Additionally, I would dispense with any left-leaning political bumperstickers. Just as it is unwise for me to park on a university campus, or on a Freemont street with a pro-Republican bumpersticker, it is equally unwise to pass through some hillbilly towns with "Maria Cantwell" or "visualize world peace" prominently displayed on a vehicle. (although I'm not sure why they would be so offended by "Petzyl") In spite of my strong political beliefs, I never put political bumperstickers on my car. I travel this side of MRNP alot, and have never had any problems. Indeed, Carbonado is probably a lot more "left leaning" than you think. Ditto Wilkeson and Enumclaw. Perhaps it is that little settlement down on the Carbon River just below the spot where Mowich Road forks off??? Regardless, this is "gun country" and there are bad people everywhere. Arm yourselves! [ 11-03-2002, 09:08 PM: Message edited by: Fairweather ] -
1986 FJ-60 Toyota Landcruiser. Unfortunately, I sold it years ago for a T-100 2WD pickup. I miss it terribly. Better gas milage now, though.
-
Thanks! Great story. Starcher and Truitt were participants on Rusk's Castle climb in 1921. They were guided to the true summit, through the fog, by the sound of hammers building the new summit lookout. I think of this point in time when I run my hand along the cold, desiccated timbers as they now rest atop Mount Adams. I believe they also carried Rusk's ashes to the top of The Castle a few years later. (Via a traverse from Piker's Peak?) I didn't realize however, that they were such "hard men".
-
quote: Originally posted by mattp: quote:Originally posted by Fairweather: "If you torture the data long enough, it will tell you what you want to hear." That is true, but you didn't raise this argument last week, when GregW stated that crime increased when they banned guns in Australia and in England. The issue is more complex within the US where individual states can write their own gun laws to a large degree. My "data torture" comment was intended to cut both ways, my own beliefs aside.
-
quote: Originally posted by AlpineK: Isn't the 2nd amendment more open to interpretation than the first. I mean does having an armed militia mean that everyone has the right to own a gun. I think the 1st amendment is a lot clearer. I disagree. Indeed, liberals have successfully twisted the First Amendment.... "Congress shall make no law respecting the establishment of religion, or prohibiting the excercise thereof:....." Now we have those who believe "separation of church and state" is written in the constitution. Liberals have denied countless individuals the right to freely excercise their religion(s) in public places by twisting the First Amendment. Why should I trust them to interpret the Second Amendment?
-
"If you torture the data long enough, it will tell you what you want to hear." Statistics that present are true, valid, unbiased picture of this debate are probably unobtainable. The debate is too polarized. I say, when in doubt look it up in the Bill of Rights. How amazing that among the most vocal defenders of amendment #1, are the same who would throw out #2. Just more liberal hypocricy. [ 11-01-2002, 09:00 PM: Message edited by: Fairweather ]
-
DigiCams: Anyone have Nikon Coolpix 5000 or Canon Powershot G2?
Fairweather replied to jon's topic in The Gear Critic
One consideration that often gets overlooked is ergonomics. The Nikon 5000 is easier to use with a gloved/one hand. I love Nikon grips. You can also buy a little rubber sheild to put over the screen on sunny days. I recently perchased a Minolta Dimage F100 4mp camera. It takes great pictures ana I love the choice of AA lithium or Nimh rechargeables. I also love the little SD cards. Weighs 6oz. Paid $499. A smaller camera is easier to keep warm beneath a parka. Still, I would have bought the Nikon 5000 but for the price. -
quote: Originally posted by Terminal Gravity: Thanks all...Good Info. I am heading to Vera Cruz, Oaxaca, the beaches west of Puerto Angel and ( of course ) Orizaba. One question. Why not drive at Night. I have heard this so many times; but never why. Is it the potholes and stray livestock or is it more serious? I have driven plenty in Baja (even at night) and didn't have any real problems but I have never driven in the interior. Are you planning a side-trip up Orizaba en route to Veracruz by chance? "Family vacations" with ulterior climbing motives sewn in are one of my specialties. I'll be down there in late January. I'll be flying.
-
Nice trip! Glad to hear the Hamma Hamma road is finally fixed. Makes me feel like I'm getting something for my trail-park $$$$. We did Cruiser from Flapjack Lks last year. A very memorable climb in the fog. That first move up the face is kinda scary until you see that bolt just above.
-
quote: Originally posted by E-rock: RobBob, since you are polling us for an opinion and this is something I feel very strongly about (and Caveman bullied me into responding with childish insults ), I'm going to speak my mind. I'll go much farther than to say that snowmobiles (and jetskis) should be banned from NP's, I think they should be restricted to a very finite number of specified locations where they are separated from all other forms of winter (and summer) recreation. I believe that people who partake in the use of snowmobiles and jetskis have no sense of aethetics and no reverence for the natural environment. Over the years I have had my altercations with 'bilers in the backcountry. My opinion is that they are generally a bunch of drunken, ape-draped, homophobic, brutes who feel empowered by their gas-burning toys and feel a need to overcompensate for their masculine insecurities. I think the practice of high-marking is destructive to the human spirit and our respect for the mountains. The high marking of high, steep slopes is done with such ease and speed that several sleds can track out an enormous mountainside in a matter of minutes. Because this act is so easy to commit, it makes the mountains feel smaller than they really are. It inflates the human reference frame to the point where we can view ourselves to be as significant as the mountains themselves, which on geologic and spatial scales is not true. I remember once talking a group of 'bilers out of beating me and my friend to a pulp, because my bigmouthed friend was yelling off the ridge at them. They believed that they had more of a right to be in the mountains than us because they "payed taxes on their sleds". These are the sorts of people who ride snowmobiles. They are the same people who bitch and complain that the governent taxes them against their will, then contend that their taxes have bought them priviledges (rights even!). The snowmobiler is a particularly odd sort of redneck, he (and I say HE because you see very few female high-markers/recreational sledders) comes from the city with his money, his gas burning toys, and his irreverence. He pollutes the land with noise and fumes, pisses off the locals, frightens the wildlife, and then goes home to his life of societal insecurities. The reason I was reluctant to post this is that many people on this site may use snowmobiles themselves for approaches. My opinion is biased against this for two reasons: I cut my backcountry teeth in a place where access was easy and snowmobiles were unrequired, and I choose not to access those places where a snowmobile would be necessary. Perhaps I would feel less strongly about snowmobiles as access vehicles if the four stroke engine was readily marketed. I think the two-stroke engine is a disgusting, wasteful excuse for engineering. Furthermore, I'm reluctant to say these things because: 1. I criticize backcountry snowmobilers for claiming their 'right' to recreate supercedes mine, while... 2. At the same time I contend to have 'more' of a right to visit the mountains in unmotorized peace. I am unable to reconcile this paradox in my own mind and fall back on the philosophical aspects of my opinion as expressed above. E Rock Sounds to me like you and your friend were the ones who were the instigators and got the confrontation you likely deserved with the 'bilers. Your attitude is selfish, arrogant, and slightly effeminate. Do you live in Seattle, drive a Subaru, tele-ski, or have a government job by chance? ...just responding to your stereotypical aspersions. [ 10-29-2002, 10:32 PM: Message edited by: Fairweather ]
-
One of my favorites... "Some scientists claim that hydrogen, because it is so plentiful, is the basic building block of the universe. I dispute that. I say that there is plenty more stupidity than hydrogen, and that is the basic building block of the universe." ---Frank Zappa
-
Any sign of artifacts that have melted their way through from the surface snows of the crater such as old axes, climbing gear, airplanes, etc.? Is there any danger, while sleeping inside the caves, of hydrogen sulphide, or other gas displacing the oxygen you would require....in order to wake up? ie: is there any history of "burps" that would be a problem for a cave explorer/visitor? I've been to the summit 15 times over the past 20 years, and have yet to set foot inside a steam cave. [ 10-07-2002, 09:42 PM: Message edited by: Fairweather ]
-
quote: Originally posted by Poseur: Way back when I needed a bear gun, the 870 was the better pick over the 500, based on the highly scientific "shake test" - shake 'em both and see which one rattles the most and then buy the other. The Remington 870 is probably a superior weapon overall. However the Mossberg 500 is a bit lighter as the receiver is aluminum, versus steel for the 870.
-
Winchester Ranger .30-.30 cal lever gun. 33 inches overall length and under 6lbs. 5 shots in the magazine. I know this is a marginal caliber, but it beats the hell out of ANY handgun incl. .44mag. Stoeger "Coachgun". 12ga side-by-side; the theory being that you'll not likely get off more than two shots from a pump-gun anyway, so why not go with two virtually simultaneous shots from a double barrel? Use 00 for bears; #4 for the "other predators" out there. My two cents.
-
Impressions and Stereotypes. If the (human causation) global warming alarmists weren't so closely allied with fringe groups and socialist/anarchist causes around the world, their positions might receive a more moderate and considered reception. I realize that it is these fringe groups who cling to this science and use it as a mechanism to advance their causes, and that the climate scientists who subscribe to HCGW are (mostly) sincere. But they should do more to distance themselves from radicals and radical ideas and promote a more gradual/long term social/economic change. In the view of many, including myself, Kyoto was indeed a radical idea. (And worthless to boot!) If humans are in fact responsible for a measure of global warming, it has yet to be proven to me... and millions of others. And when I see lefties as the primary promoters of HCGW theory, I simply "tune out". I suspect the most moderate presentaion of the science will win the hearts and minds of the general population. Not the side that hysterically presents its story as "fact" before all the "facts" are in. Spend $1,000,000,000,000 of American tax dollars on "a hunch"?? A "what if" proposition?? That will never fly. As I see it, the burden of proof falls on those who want us to change our way of life.
-
...oh shit, here we go again.
-
My heart aches for this guy's wife and children. I understand that he had two. I heard that Jim Wickwire was leading this climb. If this is true, it continues the "unluckiest" streak in the history of mountaineering. (for partners deceased, that is) I don't believe in karma or luck, but if they exist JW's are rotten. [ 09-23-2002, 09:52 PM: Message edited by: Fairweather ]
-
-
quote: Originally posted by Necronomicon: The Japanese civilians were at the point of pushing the militarists to surrender. Even the emperor was pushing to surrender. We bombed Hiroshima and Nagasaki, in part, to end the war quickly so that the USSR would have no claim to occupying Japan, as they had yet to declare war against Japan. We also sent a message to the Soviets saying "Hey, look what we have and you don't." Ever heard of Sakalin Island? They still hold it. Your theory is bunk. I am undecided on the whole Iraq thing. Lets instead invade Saudi Arabia and install a government that allows women to drive cars and citizens to attend secular schools that don't teach their citizens to hate the west. We should just assasinate Saddam and his close associates and let the chips fall where they may. Judge Judy for president!!!! [ 09-17-2002, 09:18 PM: Message edited by: Fairweather ]
-
"Tell me who you'd think would be better before you pan this point."[/QB] Ok, I like GW and can think of only one person who would do a better job: Ariel Sharon. [ 09-16-2002, 10:41 PM: Message edited by: Fairweather ]
-
Tahoma Glacier; first ascent in 1891 by P.B. VanTrump, Dr Warren Riley,.... and Riley's Deerhound.