Fairweather

Rush Limbaugh has been off the air since last Friday. (In rehab, ya know.) Could you explain how you were able to hear him on Tuesday? I've never heard anyone refer to Tim Russert as a conservative. Or a liberal, for that matter. Basically, he is the quintessential moderator.

??? I think you've twisted/misquoted me. I compared the hysterics of today's left with the past hysteria of radical right-wing groups such as the Michigan militia. I refer to WTO protests/(ers) as exibit A.

Teh belt is likely encountering resistance from the PS drive pulley because of a bad bearing. Remove the belt and grab the PS pulley with your hand. Pull it back and forth vigorously...there should be no play whatsoever. If there is, it is probably a bad bearing. (or a stripped drive shaft) You may be able to replace the bearing, depending on the type of pump/availability. Otherwise, replace the entire unit for $$$. As for the leaks, you could try to stop steering so much!

Fair enough. I know this has been posted befor, but I would say it shed light on this issue. Liberal vs. Conservative, Left vs. Right, Thinking vs. Reactionary, one wat to judge a news organization is determine its listeners/viewers/readers ability to judge realitiy. A recent poll indicates that 80% of frequent FOX news views have one or more major misconceptions about the war in Iraq whereas only about 23% of NPR listeners hold these same beliefs. To the extent that any of these news source tell the truth NPR is much closer to it than most and FOX as way out there. link You can argue that the study was conducted by the "liberal media" but if you accept it, its hard not to admit more liberal the media the less biased they are. Good lord! "Truth Out.com" is your personal information source these days? I propose that you have no business bashing FOX if you get even a portion of your news diet from a site like that. Additionally I propose, that contrary to your statement, those on the left are more reactionary than thinking as demonstrated by their recent hysterics which rival those of the Michigan Militia!

Mods can only ban users, and mods aren't on the user list...like you are sucker. Matt and I are equal in terms of mod power. Damn! I wanted you to ban Matt.

What do you call a prostitute with a runny nose?

Matt's not gonna' let you wax n' shine his boots anymore if you don't cool it, AK. Question: Can one moderator ban another moderator? (Or are you and PP kinda' like a second leutenant, and Mattp and OW like colonel?) That would really liven it up! Wouldn't it?

Good point RobBob. That would be an exception. Most (but not all) rescuees are deserving of a good spraying at the very least.

For what it's worth Matt, you're right. I think trashing someone's TR is bullshit. The Mt. Hood snowcat post is a classic example of this practice. (I felt bad for the poor guy who posted a perfectly valid report.) Keep the spray out of the TR section. Now, about your politics......

NPR portrays itself as unbiased news. It's ad sponsors are a veritable "who's who" of liberal and left wing foundations, (ie: The Pew Charitable Trust) ... with the exception of the American taxpayer! None of the conservative radio talk shows try to claim political neutrality, and none of them are "news" shows. They are up-front, provacative, and a nice addition to the national debate. Micheal Medved actually takes calls almost exclusively from opposing points of view and, of course, challenges them. Rush Limbaugh is primarily entertainment, with witty political satire. It is a hilarious show! ....but then, most who bash him have probably never actually listened to his full show, and merely rely on snippets and out of context quotes, fourth-hand, for their spoon-fed opinions. Sean Hannity is basically a juvenile idiot, with little in the way of debating skills or brains. Pure garbage. Bill ORilley is interesting and somewhat more balanced in his views, but his "know-it-all" attitude wears thin. (As opposed to Limbaugh's, which is always tounge-in-cheek.) Micheal Savage is beyond redemption. An extreme right winger in every sense. Don't forget Dave Ross (local) on KIRO AM....liberal. Also Mike Webb on KIRO....leftist. There are others too. The AM dial is not 100% "conservative". Regardless, talk shows are not news! (You seem to have a hard time with this concept, Matt.) FOX is surely right-leaning.....because there is a market for it. But they are no more right-of-center than CBS, NBC, ABC are left-of. Why is it, in the media, that conservatives are perfectly happy being called just that, while liberals never want to reveal or admit to such? Or they rename themselves "progressive" or some other innocuous label? Why is it that liberals are always the first to cry out for censorship (ie: talk radio) when they hear views with which they disagree? BTW Matt, I finished Blinded by the Right the other day. I'll let you know my thoughts soon. For now, I'll just say it was a good bathroom read. Really helped me with my nightly purge. Also, Kudos to CC.com for "promoting" PP to moderator. It's nice to have someone here to counter the views of another- certain-moderator who's name I shall not mention.

Rainier Las Vegas Marathon Cotopaxi?

This country has always had military leaders who felt they had a "greater calling" religious or otherwise. Patton, McArthur, Teddy Roosevelt, Grant, Sherman, Jackson (CSA) etc, etc. For the most part, with the possible exception of McArthur, they followed their orders as given. It seems a certain amount of eccentricity is a pre-requisite for the job. But it is the duty of the President to ensure their loyalty (to the constitution), to reign them in, or demote/retire them. This guy probably needs a "sit-down" with his superiors and a stern reminder of where his loyalties must lie. You want to talk about a goofy-assed general, do some research re Wesley Clark. The guy is scary. Too bad Dwayner isn't here to participate in this thread... Seriously.

http://fun.drno.de/flash/celebxxx.swf

All Seattle city dwellers are liberals. Everyone knows that!

Seattle liberals bitchin' about, and evading the very tax they imposed upon themselves via direct democracy! I LOVE it! Hey Seattle residents....Pay your tax! You voted for it. BTW, the "rest of us", in this otherwise great state,don't want to pony up 13 billion $$$ for your new Alaska Way Viaduct. Please vote yourselves a tax on that one too....or just tear the thing down.

Sunday night I ordered a new pair of AT skis (K2 8611's) from "Cascade Crags" via one of the new sponsorship links here on CC.Com. I feel I got a good price, and the skis arrived FedEx at my door this afternoon, less than 48 hours after placing my order. Just thought I'd give a big to Cascade Crags and to the whole advertising/links idea. Now I have to figure out which bindings to mount on my new boards!

Oh, sorry I guess I missed the part when Bill Clinton said he admired Hitler. My bad! Actually, Clinton's stated mentor and object of his admiration was William Fulbright, avowed segragationist and communist sympathizer. BTW, better check your info regarding Schwarzeneger's supposed Hitler comments. I believe they've been debunked.

Now that Arnold has apparently won the governorship of California, who wants to bet that the Dem's, either directly or through a proxy, will challenge the results or the constitutionality of this recall election? Question #2: How many anti-Arnold stories will The LA Times run in the next 365 days?

It seems to me that simple single antenna, analog transceivers are outrageously overpriced. (Pieps, Ortovox F1, etc) They are such simple devices, I can't imagine why they still fetch $200 - $300 in a free market. Frankly, I wonder if the prices are "fixed". I'm sure the R&D costs associated with this dated technology is no longer a factor in justifying the currently asked retails. Especially since there seems to be a migration toward the dual antenna models. After taking Paul Bauger's avy classes up at Crystal a few years back, I came to the following conclusion: Any avy forcast above "moderate", means I stay home or go lift skiing. If I doubt things enough to dig a pit, I probably shouldn't be there in the first place. Not a fool-proof system, but hey.......I wanna liiiivvve!

i hope you are not serious there's great logic... lets kill em before they get a chance to strike! sound familiar?

Matt, You may be confusing Manning, who is decidedly anti-access, with the late Ira Spring. Spring, whom I greatly admire, was a true moderate and believed that access ensured continued public interest in wilderness and its preservation. Frankly, I don't know where Ira stood re: MF Road. As for Manning, look at pages 217-219 in "100 Hikes in the Alpine Lakes". If you don't have a copy, I can regurgitate it here, but to summarize: "Permanent closure of The Middle Fork Road is the goal.....eventually trips [up The Middle Fork] can begin at North Bend". Also, look at "MidFORC" and "ALPS" as key players in this farce. I realize criticizing Harvey Manning is blasphemous in present company, but a quick journey through his "Hikes" series, and numerous other publications, reveal him to be completely radicalized IMHO.

This Fucking pisses me off. Issues like this are the very reason I turned into a bona-fide enviro group hater. I went to two of these "public hearings", and rest assured, the majority of folks at these meetings did not support this decision. No doubt Washington Trails Association, self appointed title-holder to our public lands, got a write-in campaign going. This issue has been kept "under the radar" for the past couple years after initial public outrage. ....So now you see how it works. Fucking WTA! They call themselves a "trails advocacy" organization, but they were key in getting this decision passed. Harvey Manning hiked his trails, took his pics, wrote his guidebooks, and now wants to lock us out. (He too was instrumental in this "project".) Watch out folks.....your favorite area is probably the next target of these groups.

Colombia

...unless, of course, they support your politics, eh Scrambler?