Fairweather

Do you have to wear a mask and goggles when you de-brain them?

Only if you give up NPR and ...wax my fucking boots. Just trying to help you AK. It's da drugs, day be makin' dem brain wooorms grow in yo hed.

Got it. "Seattle-speak". The important thing though, is that you give up the drugs.

There was a bear in North Tacoma a couple years ago just minding his own business, not hurting anybody. The cops came and shot it. So a bear strolls into town and knocks a couple garbage cans over. Big fuckin' deal. Leave 'em alone!

Any members here?

Give up those drugs and get back to a strict alcohol regimen. The only worms I'm worried about are the ones that might be growing in my intestines from the untreated water I drank in The Goat Rocks a couple weeks ago.

Pinochet was the dictator in Chile. Not Argentina. Allende was the dictator in Chile. I was there and in Panama in 1972. Pinochet was in Argentina Mtnmouse, With all respect, Pinochet was the dictator of Chile: http://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/factbook/geos/ci.html

Dalai Lama Weighs In on War on Terror Wednesday, September 10, 2003 WASHINGTON — The Dalai Lama (search) said Wednesday that the U.S.-led war in Afghanistan may have been justified to win a larger peace, but that it is too early to judge whether the Iraqi campaign was warranted. Click to learn more... "I think history will tell," he said in an interview with The Associated Press just after he met with President Bush at the White House. "In principle, I always believe nonviolence is the right thing, and nonviolent method is in the long more effective," said the Dalai Lama, who implored Bush to avoid a violent response by the United States after the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001. The exile Tibetan leader, awarded the Nobel Peace Prize (search) in 1989, said the Vietnam War increased suffering and was a "failure." But, he said, some wars, including the Korean War and World War II, helped "protect the rest of civilization, democracy." He said he saw a similar result in Afghanistan (search) -- "perhaps some kind of liberation." "The people themselves, I think, suffer a lot under their previous regimes," the Dalai Lama said. But he was adamant that the United States not lose sight of rebuilding Afghanistan amid other, more pressing issues. "Now another problem, Iraq problem started, so neglect about Afghanistan, that's wrong," he said. The United States "should follow up," he added. Iraq, he said with a chuckle, is "more complicated" and will require hindsight to judge. "This moment, too early to say," he said. The Dalai Lama said he had "briefly mentioned" his concerns to Bush during their meeting in the White House residence. He deflected a question about Bush's response with a laugh. "Just -- I mentioned, that's all," he said. ...It looks like j_b and Mattp are even more peace-loving than the Dali Lama himself.

Pinochet was the dictator in Chile. Not Argentina. Pinochet and his regime were terrible, but neither come anywhere close to regimes that the left enthusiastically supported for the duration of the past century, and will gleefully support in the future if there is every a nation masochistic enough to attempt a Marxist revival. How true, JayB. This is the real threat to our liberties. I'll get flamed for this, but how many hundred-thousands (millions?) of lives were saved by Peron and Pinochet because they acted extrajudicially against communists within their borders? Granted, they were terrible regimes, but just look at what has happened to countries like Columbia that let these movements take hold. And how many more have died there.

Pinochet was the dictator in Chile. Not Argentina.

Sorry, Murray. Most Americans have little interest in any balanced history and even less willingness to be "even handed about it" if by that you mean a willingness to recognized the fact that our foreign policy is driven by corporate greed and a fundamental belief that we are and should be able to run the world. Murray, of course you're right....Zimbabwe. It should be apparent that I got my "Z's" mixed up after listing Congo. My boss was born and raised in the nation now known as Zimbabwe and now lives here for reasons that probably go without saying. Mattp, Your unsolicited apologies vis a vis this great nation typify the guilt and shame felt by so many liberals like yourself. May you wollow in it alone. I hope you don't presume to speak for us all. I think Murray's subsequent response to your grovel was spot-on.

Thread drift re: Tax Cuts. While I supported the first round of the "Bush" tax cuts as good economic stimulus, I never supported the second round. The rebate check I received almost two months ago remains uncashed in my desk drawer. I think the more recent federal tax rates for personal income are adequately curved upward. ("Progressive", as some like to call it.) Not outrageously steep as it once was, (70% top marginal was criminal!) but not too flat as to place an unwarrented burden on those at the bottom income levels. I had no problem with federal personal tax rates prior to the latest round of tax cuts. I would like to see the national debt, now at about 6 trillion dollars, reduced so that I may one day reclaim my social security pay-in. State and local is another matter....

WOW! That tool looks like it could get you into any number of "gated" FS roads.

Have you looked at an approach up from Elk Lake and onto the White Glacier? It looks like it would work...at least on TOPO.

An excellent question, Greg. Is this money to be used for security and rebuilding Iraq's oil infrastructure in leiu of future repayment? If so, fine. I'd certainly like to see the long range plan though.

I don't know if that's possible in fiercely tribal Afghanistan. Iraq has a more highly educated population to a large degree, and has never had a reputation for strict adherance to the tenents of Islam. I have more hope for a just system of government there.

We effectively scattered the Taliban and Al Queda. At least for a time. The latter no longer operate training camps in the former's host country and their world-wide recruitment effort has been dealt a setback and been forced underground to a large extent.. No longer do militant muslim zealots from around the world flock to Afghanistan for training and indoctrination. Osama, if he's still alive (And I doubt he is. Kidney dialysis aint' easy to come by in the Hindu Kush.) is probably living the life of the savage he is. In ousting the Taliban, we chose sides with an only slightly lesser evil. That is for sure. And not the first time, or last. But the Northern Alliance didn't help/support the 9/11 attackers. The Taliban did. If the Taliban wish to attempt re-constitution, all the better. They're easier to kill when they're in large camps/groups. Bush never claimed this would be an easy task. Indeed, I recall him saying that it would take many years. How true. Karzai seems sincere. I hope we help him gain control over the warlords/countryside.

...but would he gain the support of liberals like you if he "compromised" on just a few issues, and not the whole liberal shopping list? ...I think not. Good idea. Isn't this what Bush is now trying to do?

Many of these countries are owed $$billions by the former Regime. So, yes, they might be willing to "do the math" and decide what is in their ultimate interest. Personally, I think if GW were to give up any military control/command to the UN (aka France and Germany) he would lose the votes of twenty million conservatives straight away. Mine included. Our soldiers swear an oath to the US constitution, not the UN charter. Some of the UN's other great successes: Korea: stalemate Congo: millions dead Rwanda: millions dead Zaire (formerly Rhodesia): Facist/racist dictator now in charge ...and of course, who could forget the UN "safe haven" of Srebrenica and how the UN troops (French, I believe) stepped aside and let the Serb butchers come in to slaughter almost every man and boy in the city. I would prefer to see us bring allies on board one at a time, like Russian Fed., Pakistan, others who don't have a (recent) track record of back-stabbing.

You're right about sticking it out in Iraq. Regardless of your feelings about justification, reversing course now would result in a blood-bath. Matt, do you seriously mean that our actions in Afghanistan were not justified? Are you fucking serious? Have you forgotten how the former leaders of that nation played host to Al Queda? And then refused to evict them/ hand them over after 9/11? At least a reasonable case can be made against our actions in Iraq. But Afghanistan? Even my most liberal friends tell me our response in Afghanistan was just. What would you have done Matt? Negotiate? (Grabbed your ankles in typical liberal fashion?) Apparently you've forgotten; there is an anniversary coming up on Thursday. Some 2700 killed 9/11/01 from 40+ nations. Murdered where they worked.

The bolts there now looked newer...and a LOT bigger. The hangars looke like cheap stamped aluminum, not forged. And the insides of the hangars didn't look like they were polished-out. They looked like they might cut through a sling if weighted and pulled from side to side. Shit! I wish I'd taken a picture.

Climbed the west ridge of Lundin Peak on Saturday with my brother. On the way down the normal route we noticed that there are three or four gigantic bolts with aluminum hangars the size of small dinner plates. Looks like they were homemade in a private shop. It's been quite a few years since I've been on this peak, but I don't remember these big ugly monoliths. Did The Mountaineers do this? If so, why? I realize there have been a few fatalities here, but these were spaced just a few feet apart and the climbing is only third or fourth class at the most. Were they put here to support mass-ascent practice climbs? I don't have a strong opinion either way on the Great Bolt Debate, but these ones seemed like overkill, for sure. Regardless, I'm just curious.

Looks like the St Elias Range for sure. Bagley Icefield beyond? My guesses are Logan, Hubbard, St Elias, Kennedy or something in that area.

If You Love Salmon, This Will Scare You Packed with omega-3 fatty acids, salmon is one of the healthiest foods you can eat. Or is it? The Environmental Working Group has issued a scary report indicating that farm-raised salmon--but not the kind that is fished out of streams and rivers--is contaminated with high levels of cancer-causing chemicals called polychlorinated biphenyls, more commonly known as PCBs, report Reuters and The New York Times. EWG purchased and tested salmon filets from 10 different grocery stores in Washington, D.C., San Francisco, and Portland, Oregon. Seven of the 10 filets contained high levels of PCBs. "These first-ever tests of farmed salmon from U.S. grocery stores show that farmed salmon are likely the most PCB-contaminated protein source in the U.S. food supply," the non-profit environmental investigative group said in a prepared statement. We eat a lot of salmon. About one-quarter of all adult Americans--that would be 52 million people--eat salmon and about 23 million of those eat it more than once a month. "Based on these data we estimate that 800,000 people face an excess lifetime cancer risk...from eating farmed salmon." EWG found that farmed salmon had 16 times the PCBs found in wild salmon, four times the levels in beef, and 3.4 times the levels found in other seafood. The New York Times notes that while the PCB levels in salmon are high, they do not exceed those set in 1984 by the FDA for commercially sold fish; however, they do exceed the guidelines set by the Environmental Protection Agency in 1999 for recreationally caught fish. Although this study by EWG has not been published in a peer-reviewed journal, the findings are supported by other studies done in Canada, Ireland, and Britain--all of which has forced the hand of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, which will now review the problem. What are PCBs? They come from hydraulic fluids and oils, electrical capacitors, and transformers. They are carcinogenic because they are endocrine disrupters, which are chemicals that mimic hormones. PCBs can also cause infertility and other sexual changes. Because of this, PCBs have been banned in the United States since 1976 except when they are used in completely enclosed areas. Still, they persist in the environment and animal fat. Farmed salmon are raised in high-density fish pens in what may be a pristine environment, but they are fed fishmeal from around the world. And that fishmeal is contaminated with PCBs. While the omega-3 fatty acids in salmon are healthy for us, they also provide a place for the PCBs to build up. What do the salmon farmers think of all this? An organization called Salmon of the Americas represents 80 salmon farmers in the United States, Canada, and Chile. Its spokesman says that until the farmers hear differently, they'll continue to follow the FDA regulations, rather than the more strict EPA regulations. "We assume they know what they are doing, and the regulations and levels they have promulgated mean that the food, including farmed salmon, is safe, wholesome, and nutritious. EPA and FDA should work their differences out," Alex Trent, acting director of Salmon of the Americas told the Times. "When and if the FDA changes its limits, we will be the first to comply. Someone is yelling fire in a theater to help make their point, and they haven't proven this point to the FDA yet. If they had, they would change their standards." Based on the results of this study and EPA recommendations, the New York Times advises consumers to eat farmed salmon no more than once a month. Note: Above article cut & pasted.