Fairweather

Next stop: Siberia.

climatologists and glen beck are "functionally similar" I must say, KK old boy; I never realized New Jersey was quite so gnatty. Pardon my asking, but would you have any spare Deet kicking about your kit?

the rich n' powerful appear to be dipshits on both sides of the spectrum (seem to recall the same story last year re: auto bailouts) Exactly what I was thinking too. Man, they absolutely roasted those beggars. But now, nary a raised eyebrow.

Ah yes. The relocation camp strategy made famous in the FDR days. Let Spray be the Manzanaar of the offenders who have not offended in the least.

Great story: http://www.forbes.com/2009/12/03/climate-science-gore-intelligent-technology-sutton.html

Copenhagen is off to a great start. I guess change is only for the little people... http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,579666,00.html

No. If they did, you'd probably be making excuses for me. The sad truth is that I often see HCGW women imprisoned in Subaru's and hybrids by effeminate males like you. Most of them are barren for reasons upon which I can only speculate. No doubt some are secretly lusting after that guy who just passed them in the SUV.

Nice job. I love that trip--but I never have figured which one of those little humps on the ridge is the true summit. Where do you think the snowline is right now? I'm thinking about Mount Washington and wondering if the 3700' TH is drivable--or at least close.

Does the HCGW (Holy Church of Global Warming) hold services on Saturday or Sunday?

I think your history is a little off re Germany's status on 11-11-18. I would also point you toward the Ruhr Valley in March of 1921 if you need additional examples of French arrogance. Better revisit you Hitler thesis too while you're at it--after all, he declared war on us. As for the rest of it, well, it sounds like typical everything's-our-fault lefty mouth diarrhea.

I thought you preferred boys? In any event, I'll bet she's just aching for a balding middle-aged perv with BO and a gut like yours.

Nope. I was for it after 9/11, and I think we should remain a while longer. Honestly don't know what to make of Obama's escalation.

More proof that the mentally numb erupt rage when their religion is questioned. 10 pages and counting...

No wonder he can't hold down a real job.

Tools pulling levers in November.

Hope and Change.

...cc.com's dullest tool speaks! At least TTK thinks. I honestly don't know what to make of a dim bulb like you. A really really angry version of Kevbone, I suppose.

Right. So how does one of the most reputable universities in the world simply "lose" their baseline data? Why would they fear a freedom of information disclosure?

Unless, say, it's swollen shut. is that a threat, tough-guy? I figure if Chaoda can toss around death threats here with impunity, then what's a little poke in the jaw, eh?

do you see any irony there? the us rejection of the versailles treaty was a major part of the super-shit-storm that was ww2 - it turned out that a solution to a global problem wasn't possible w/ one of the biggest players in the world sticking it's isolationist, dipshit-conservative head up its proverbial ass. not even a little bit of irony? Not at all. Europe's imposition of Versailles on Germany--our absence notwithstanding--is what brought about the counter result. In fact, I believe the US actually loaned Germany money in 1924 to help them get France off their collective backs. Don't look in the mirror if you want to understand the collapse of the Wiemar Republic--look at utterly arrogant European "victors"--like France. I'm just glad Senator Lodge and Borah were there to keep Woodrow from making fools out of us here.

Unless, say, it's swollen shut.

That's all well and good--and I agree with much of what you say--but realistic alternative energy isn't part of TTK & Co's plan either. (Sorry, but windmills just won't cut it.) He summed it up nicely earlier in this thread when he proclaimed his "long, long list of other things" on the fearmonger's political agenda--many of which, I'm sure, run contrary to what he recently called "that dusty and tired old document known as the US Constitution." In any event; what good is change based on a likely falsehood? I will say that it's pretty sad when a YouTube video of John Stewart draws more reflective responses than the research of a well-credentialed and respected glaciologist. Cc.com is truly the home of the tool.

So where's this going? Obama can make all the speeches and suck all of the libcock he wants to in Copenhagen this week, but one fact remains: It takes 67 Senate votes to ratify an international treaty, and Obama can't even rally 60 to get cloture on health care! Any "climate change" treaty he puts his signature on will face the same Senate ratification fate as Versailles and the CTBT: D.O.A.