My point is that the "wilderness" we are referring to is not what I would call a wilderness. It is an area that has been legally designated as "wilderness" in an attempt to provide something which is not actually found in the Lower 48 except in as few small areas. The issue here is whether the legal designation of a specific area as non-motorized is legitimate or not, and how you interpret that designation with respect to ratting out a driller.
Broadly, the four possible opinions here are:
I agree with the wilderness designation, and therefore would rat out the driller ...(for violating a law I agree with.)
I agree with the wilderness designation, but I would not rat out the driller (...because I think that climbers should settle this matter themselves without bringing in the Tool)
I disagree with the wilderness designation, and would not rat out the driller. (drilling, snowmobiling, dirtbikes, it's all good!)
I disagree with the wilderness designation, but would rat out the driller. (Although I don't agree with the law it should be respected? Or another reason)
See there are 4 options but Lammy only provided 2. So some of the people that appear to be voting the same way in Lammy's poll actually disagree with each other. I think that's where some of the confusion in this comes from.