Jump to content

Grab Your Ca-nkles....


JayB

Recommended Posts

http://www.theeconomicanalyst.com/content/vancouver-housing-full-correction-mode-implications-canadian-banks

"Before diving into the data, consider this fun anecdote: There are currently over 5,000 homes in Vancouver metro area for sale for over $1 million according to MLS.ca. In comparison, the NAR reports that in April, just over 7,000 homes sold in the entire US were sold for over $1 million. And this despite the fact that the US population is 135X greater than the metro Vancouver market, the average personal disposable income in the US is 20% higher than the Vancouver average ($37,100 vs. $30,800) while US per capita GDP is higher than the average for all of BC."

 

vancouver_house_prices_vs_all_fundamentals.png

 

Yipes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 17
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Mind you also in B.C. minimum wage is $12, so the bar is set much higher then in WA state.

 

Do you think that is sufficient to live off of? Or is there still pressure/complaining about it?

 

In the US the minimum wage has stagnating. If it had matched inflation from it's highest historical point, it would be over $10/hour today.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

First of all, do you understand what minimum wage is? so the question if it is sufficient is kind of stupid- isn't it!? But if you do the math, it's much easier to pay for essentials if you earn $12 vs $9 (which I guess is one of the highest in the union). But because the minimum wage is set at this level, automatically the median wage is much higher. In general I see that in Canada most of my dirtbag friends are in many cases better off then low middle class working folks here in WA state.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

First of all, do you understand what minimum wage is? so the question if it is sufficient is kind of stupid- isn't it!? But if you do the math, it's much easier to pay for essentials if you earn $12 vs $9 (which I guess is one of the highest in the union). But because the minimum wage is set at this level, automatically the median wage is much higher. In general I see that in Canada most of my dirtbag friends are in many cases better off then low middle class working folks here in WA state.

 

there is nothing "stupid" about the question; the responder OTOH...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

First of all, do you understand what minimum wage is? so the question if it is sufficient is kind of stupid- isn't it!? But if you do the math, it's much easier to pay for essentials if you earn $12 vs $9 (which I guess is one of the highest in the union). But because the minimum wage is set at this level, automatically the median wage is much higher. In general I see that in Canada most of my dirtbag friends are in many cases better off then low middle class working folks here in WA state.

 

there is nothing "stupid" about the question; the responder OTOH...

if you don't understand the subject matter and start voicing your opinions- that is definition of stupid. when were you in canada last time, anyway?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Think it was ~90% HAM in the west side at the peak, ~1% in the rest of the GVA.

 

The real story is locals buying participating in a speculative mania catalyzed by cheap credit and loose lending - same as everywhere else.

 

Not sure how HK's metrics compare to Vancouver's other than they're also massively out of line with fundamentals.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you compare the mortgage-to-income and rent-to-mortgage ratios in Manahattan and Vancouver situation will only look worse. Manhattan level prices - yes. Manhattan level incomes - no.

Look out below.

That is bullshit statement. there is a uber narrow group of high rollers from banking industry and financial sector, but a vast majority of people in NYC just scrape by. In general Canada is way more in line with fundamentals then the US.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you compare the mortgage-to-income and rent-to-mortgage ratios in Manahattan and Vancouver situation will only look worse. Manhattan level prices - yes. Manhattan level incomes - no.

Look out below.

That is bullshit statement. there is a uber narrow group of high rollers from banking industry and financial sector, but a vast majority of people in NYC just scrape by. In general Canada is way more in line with fundamentals then the US.

 

Nope.

 

canada-us-price-composite.jpg

 

mortgage-rent+ratio+for+USA+and+Canada+(The+Globe+and+Mail,+Oct+18+2010)+-+mortgages_950627a.jpg

price_rent_ratios_international.jpg

Household-Debt-to-Income-Ratio.jpg

 

Etc, etc, etc, etc, etc, etc....

 

 

Canada's fiscal position is vastly superior to America's - but their consumers are at least as overleveraged, if not more, and their home values are dramatically more out of line with their incomes and other determinants of values like mortgage-to-rent.

 

If you have data that you think establishes the contrary case, I hope you'll post it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




×
×
  • Create New...