Greenpeace Pussies

[allthumbs]

Now what fun would that be? BTW, when you releasing your next platter? I'm groovin' to #1 but lust for the new beat. J5 rocks but they're playin' it to death on the jive box. It's a shame.

[Dr_Flash_Amazing]

Per the peerless online reference known as www.dictionary.com :

 

puss·y

n. pl. puss·ies

1. Informal. A cat.

2. Botany. A fuzzy catkin, especially of the pussy willow.

3. Vulgar Slang.

--The vulva.

--Sexual intercourse with a woman.

4. Offensive Slang. Used as a disparaging term for a woman.

5. Slang. A man regarded as weak, timid, or unmanly.

[allthumbs]

TOP

 

quote:

---

by greghinemeyer:

dude you need to run to a dictionary

---

Excuse me all to hell professor. Does this mean I won't pass?

 

Lick this dog

 

[ 10-23-2002, 07:00 PM: Message edited by: trask ]

[greghinemeyer]

now find pussys

[allthumbs]

I know how it's spelled, you idiot. I intentionally misspelled it so the spelling police (which obviously includes your sorry ass) would have something to do today other than cubicle masturbation.

[greghinemeyer]

you did not. you are just stupid

[Dr_Flash_Amazing]

Ooooohhhhh! That's gotta hurt!

[allthumbs]

Hey greg hymen kiss this

[greghinemeyer]

hey this is not getting us anywhere.

[allthumbs]

Who says it's not. Why I've had three beers already and I still think you're an idiot. But if you wanna go home now, that's cool, just leave the Tonkas. See ya tomorrow.

[Fence_Sitter]

aww hymen...i think you jsut need to catch up...i've had two, trask has had three...catch up and all will be rigth in the world i promise...but that is comming from teh guy with a fat keg in his room for tomorrow night!

[greghinemeyer]

quote:

---

Originally posted by trask:

Who says it's not. Why I've had three beers already and I still think you're an idiot. But if you wanna go home now, that's cool, just leave the Tonkas. See ya tomorrow.

---

yea i got to get of the computer just like i got off your mother. bye bye

[Fence_Sitter]

are you for real? your worse than DFA! i think you should definitely heed my advice about the beer there laddie!

[allthumbs]

So

toga party at Fence Sitter's house tomorrow

be there or be square

BURP

 

[ 10-23-2002, 07:27 PM: Message edited by: trask ]

[AlpineK]

Jesus Christ Fence Sitter it isn't teh it's the

 

I'm the worst speller in the world, but I can spell the

[greghinemeyer]

hey sorry about the mother crack that was bad. later boys

[Fence_Sitter]

actually there is a party at the frasier river...if anyone wants to come, there will be a keg of kokanee...if you dont mind hanging out with some college kids, you more than welcome...PM me..

[Fence_Sitter]

sawry dood i lerned spellign frome an empoyee uf yers... i wurked wif him a bit this summer...that, and my arm is in a sling...

[allthumbs]

FS, I'd come up and suck a few pints with you boys, but duty calls tomorrow. A rain check perhaps.

[Fence_Sitter]

offers always on the table man...

 

oh and bring ice girl!

 

[ 10-23-2002, 07:45 PM: Message edited by: Fence Sitter ]

[RobBob]

quote:

---

quote:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Originally posted by RobBob:

I want to expand on my modest proposal for worldwide population control. Let's do something about it before famine and disease cause catastrophe around the globe!

 

All of our best world organizations can get involved: The UN, IMF, UNICEF. Funds, trade status, and Playstations go to the third-world nations who successfully lower their birthrate to steady-state.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

So, are you suggesting something along the lines of more condoms or more genocide? Will the population control measure be imposed on each country equally, from a random population sample? Who will be deciding all this? You?

---

Dr. Flash,

The beauty of my plan is that it is simple, involves positive incentives to the nations in question, and leaves them to the details of getting it done. Kind of like empowering states to do their own governing.

[Off_White]

quote:

---

Originally posted by Cpt.Caveman:

are they engaged in any acts or stunts that can harm the "enemy"? Just some simple questions before I make any judgements....

---

The harm Greenpeace offers is financial and public relations, not physical.

 

Some of their stunts are pretty damn bold too, getting in the way of large whaling vessels with zodiacs. I don't know that you would like their politics Ray, but they are honorable opponents.

 

[ 10-23-2002, 12:03 PM: Message edited by: Off White ]

[RobBob]

quote:

---

The harm Greenpeace offers is financial and public relations, not physical.

---

Hey Off,

Now you know better. You have enough life experience to know how provocative those boats might seem if they were crossing your bow. That's physical jousting, man.

[MtnGoat]

"Sure, common good is a (admittedly fuzzy) moral concept, and its where I differ from Mtn Goat's vision of five billion people looking out for number one and screw the rest of you."

 

Five billion people can look out for number one and take others into account in doing so. Don't *you* look out for number one, while still taking others into account? Of course you do. So do most people, I think.

 

As for the "screw the rest of you", it would be better if you made it clear this is your view of what I believe, and not something I have ever espoused. Does this fact enter your deliberation when you consider my actual positions, or does your view of what I contend outweigh what I actually say?

 

Looking out for others simply does not imply that doing so will result in actions you agree with. The problem seems to be some folks only count a decision as "looking out for others" if it meets their view of what looking out for others means. Folks can make perfectly honest, valid, and intentional choices to look out for others and still disagree about how that is achieved.

 

What strikes me repeatedly in these discussions is the seemingly inherent expectation that "looking out for others" has only certain, particular actions always related to one innate view of a particular ideology as "good", namely one that inevitably involves some kind of enforced collectivism as a basis..... Instead of of allowing for the fact that this idea can be expressed in many, many ways, all valid and all honest. Just because someone's consideration of "the good of others" does not meet an implied standard that the result will follow "progressive" points for action, does *not* indicate such thinking has not occurred. I find that the good of others is best met by allowing said others the power to decide what is for their *own* good, not my imposition of a view of what is good for them.

 

[ 10-23-2002, 12:21 PM: Message edited by: MtnGoat ]

[iain]

Joe Simpson = huge greenpeace fan and activist.