EWolfe Posted January 27, 2006 Share Posted January 27, 2006 You know it's been too long. Admit it. "How much is a Brazilian?" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
underworld Posted January 27, 2006 Share Posted January 27, 2006 overplayed Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EWolfe Posted January 27, 2006 Author Share Posted January 27, 2006 NEVER!!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
underworld Posted January 27, 2006 Share Posted January 27, 2006 obviously...since this thread just really took off... 3 replies already. all making fun of W Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr_Flash_Amazing Posted January 27, 2006 Share Posted January 27, 2006 NEVER!!!! Whose content were you criticizing a little bit ago, there, E? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cobra_Commander Posted January 27, 2006 Share Posted January 27, 2006 was that photo shot with the mars rover camera Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mattp Posted January 27, 2006 Share Posted January 27, 2006 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EWolfe Posted January 28, 2006 Author Share Posted January 28, 2006 NEVER!!!! Whose content were you criticizing a little bit ago, there, E? Touche. I didn't want to outplay the famous DFA, so I had to knock it down a few notches. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EWolfe Posted January 28, 2006 Author Share Posted January 28, 2006 The absence of Dave Schuldt on this re-thread is the REAL kiss of death. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr_Flash_Amazing Posted January 28, 2006 Share Posted January 28, 2006 I didn't want to outplay the famous DFA, so I had to knock it down a few notches. Likely story, you shyster. You've fooled no one with your cowardly backpedaling. Twenty pushups! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave_Schuldt Posted January 28, 2006 Share Posted January 28, 2006 There's a picture out there called "Bush Back Mountain" I looked for it on Google and couldn't find it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EWolfe Posted January 28, 2006 Author Share Posted January 28, 2006 whew! annoy.com, brokebank Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
willstrickland Posted January 28, 2006 Share Posted January 28, 2006 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dru Posted January 28, 2006 Share Posted January 28, 2006 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EWolfe Posted January 28, 2006 Author Share Posted January 28, 2006 I hate link blocks! gw bush +gif lifeisajoke.com link. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whidbey Posted January 28, 2006 Share Posted January 28, 2006 GWB does so suck. If'n you can't fig'r it our already you get what you didn't fight against. So yes you do suck assssssssssssss. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ScottP Posted January 28, 2006 Share Posted January 28, 2006 "I am a war president." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ScottP Posted January 28, 2006 Share Posted January 28, 2006 "I am a war president." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
knelson Posted January 29, 2006 Share Posted January 29, 2006 "Because the — all which is on the table begins to address the big cost drivers. For example, how benefits are calculate, for example, is on the table; whether or not benefits rise based upon wage increases or price increases. There's a series of parts of the formula that are being considered. And when you couple that, those different cost drivers, affecting those — changing those with personal accounts, the idea is to get what has been promised more likely to be — or closer delivered to what has been promised. Does that make any sense to you? It's kind of muddled. Look, there's a series of things that cause the — like, for example, benefits are calculated based upon the increase of wages, as opposed to the increase of prices. Some have suggested that we calculate — the benefits will rise based upon inflation, as opposed to wage increases. There is a reform that would help solve the red if that were put into effect. In other words, how fast benefits grow, how fast the promised benefits grow, if those — if that growth is affected, it will help on the red." —George W. Bush, explaining his plan to save Social Security, Tampa, Fla., Feb. 4, 2005 With the upcoming State of the Union address, we can only wait with great anticipation to see what his "focus" will be for this year. He made such great strides with Social Security, I can only imagine. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EWolfe Posted January 29, 2006 Author Share Posted January 29, 2006 Those Crazy Liberals! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ScottP Posted January 29, 2006 Share Posted January 29, 2006 "Because the — all which is on the table begins to address the big cost drivers. For example, how benefits are calculate, for example, is on the table; whether or not benefits rise based upon wage increases or price increases. There's a series of parts of the formula that are being considered. And when you couple that, those different cost drivers, affecting those — changing those with personal accounts, the idea is to get what has been promised more likely to be — or closer delivered to what has been promised. Does that make any sense to you? It's kind of muddled. Look, there's a series of things that cause the — like, for example, benefits are calculated based upon the increase of wages, as opposed to the increase of prices. Some have suggested that we calculate — the benefits will rise based upon inflation, as opposed to wage increases. There is a reform that would help solve the red if that were put into effect. In other words, how fast benefits grow, how fast the promised benefits grow, if those — if that growth is affected, it will help on the red." —George W. Bush, explaining his plan to save Social Security, Tampa, Fla., Feb. 4, 2005 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
willstrickland Posted January 30, 2006 Share Posted January 30, 2006 Uniter, not divider. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
willstrickland Posted January 30, 2006 Share Posted January 30, 2006 The Joker. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whidbey Posted January 30, 2006 Share Posted January 30, 2006 The State of the Union on Tuesday should be interesting. Looking forward to more stupid pet tricks by the dipshit. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZimZam Posted January 30, 2006 Share Posted January 30, 2006 tax cuts, tax cuts, and more tax cuts. i used to think i hated nixon but this dipshit only proves that i only disliked nixon. i really hate silver spoon fed, deferment grabbing, ivy league monarchists. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.