lummox Posted December 21, 2005 Share Posted December 21, 2005 i am all for it. it should really clean up corporate america. aint no enron gonna happen again. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr_Flash_Amazing Posted December 21, 2005 Share Posted December 21, 2005 i am all for it. it should really clean up corporate america. aint no enron gonna happen again. See, if our idiot president made better use of his misuse of the NSA, our nation would be a better place. Here's to more constructive constitutional violations in 2006! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dechristo Posted December 21, 2005 Share Posted December 21, 2005 I'll do it Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
catbirdseat Posted December 21, 2005 Share Posted December 21, 2005 I've noticed that the Republicans seem to be more upset about this than the Democrats. What's up with that? The Dems are supposed to be the upholders of liberty and freedom. The Repubs are traditionally the law and order party. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
minx Posted December 21, 2005 Share Posted December 21, 2005 But i do believe that ideologically (although perhaps not in reality) they are supposedly all about personal freedoms and liberty. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kix Posted December 21, 2005 Share Posted December 21, 2005 I spied on my wife and caught her spying on me. turns out we were just suspicious of each others suspicions. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dechristo Posted December 21, 2005 Share Posted December 21, 2005 You gonna sing us the Pina Colada song? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
minx Posted December 21, 2005 Share Posted December 21, 2005 I spied on my wife and caught her spying on me. turns out we were just suspicious of each others suspicions. suckers Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kix Posted December 21, 2005 Share Posted December 21, 2005 she is. not me. I'm a licker. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZimZam Posted December 21, 2005 Share Posted December 21, 2005 I've noticed that the Republicans seem to be more upset about this than the Democrats. What's up with that? The Dems are supposed to be the upholders of liberty and freedom. The Repubs are traditionally the law and order party. Thats because Jorge has fckd their party worse than Nixon. Now they're just trying to look righteous. Fck em they followed the idiot like a pack of lemmings. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stefan Posted December 21, 2005 Share Posted December 21, 2005 I've noticed that the Republicans seem to be more upset about this than the Democrats. What's up with that? The Dems are supposed to be the upholders of liberty and freedom. The Repubs are traditionally the law and order party. I have always perceived the Republicans as wanting government to be less into people's lives. But then again...a lot of the Republicans were for the so called "Patriot Act." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
murraysovereign Posted December 21, 2005 Share Posted December 21, 2005 I've noticed that the Republicans seem to be more upset about this than the Democrats. What's up with that? Simple - the Republicans are upset because news like this will make it harder for them come next year's mid-term elections, whereas Democrats are glad that Dubya keeps looking worse and alienating even some of his core constituents because it helps them in those same elections. It's a classic strategy: "give 'em enough rope." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
archenemy Posted December 21, 2005 Share Posted December 21, 2005 I've noticed that the Republicans seem to be more upset about this than the Democrats. What's up with that? The Dems are supposed to be the upholders of liberty and freedom. The Repubs are traditionally the law and order party. I have always perceived the Republicans as wanting government to be less into people's lives. But then again...a lot of the Republicans were for the so called "Patriot Act." As well as telling kids what language they have to speak in school, telling adults what gender they have to marry, telling women what children they have to have, telling schools what religions they have to teach, and on and on and on and on and on Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JayB Posted December 21, 2005 Share Posted December 21, 2005 Anyone care to mention who it was that they were spying on and for what purpose? I've been too busy to follow this story. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Camilo Posted December 21, 2005 Share Posted December 21, 2005 They were spying on everyone!!! Don't you get it? This is a police state! Okay, international communications originating from or coming into the U.S. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dechristo Posted December 21, 2005 Share Posted December 21, 2005 Me. They want my designs for a 120mpg carburetor, atomizing ray-gun, and alchemistic gold. The fuckers are gettin' close... I can smell the foul bastards... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ScottP Posted December 22, 2005 Share Posted December 22, 2005 "It appears a federal judge has resigned an appointed post in disagreement over President Bush's authorization of a domestic spy program. U.S. District Judge James Robertson was one of 11 members of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, known as FISA, until he sent his letter of resignation to Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts today. The Washington Post reported that the letter gave no reason for the resignation but said it was in protest over the president's secret authorization of the warrantless domestic spying program. "This was definitely a statement of protest," said Scott Silliman, a former Air Force attorney and Duke University law professor. "It is unusual because it signifies that at least one member of the court believes that the president has exceeded his legal authority." link Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.