espirita Posted August 19, 2005 Posted August 19, 2005 What's it say? (I'm in Tacoma and my eyesight isn't THAT good.) Quote
olyclimber Posted August 19, 2005 Author Posted August 19, 2005 antiabortion message including a picture of a fetus Quote
archenemy Posted August 19, 2005 Posted August 19, 2005 Are you shitting me? That is horrible. Especially during lunch. Yech. Wonder if their doctor-shooting campaign was not as effective as they'd hoped? Quote
klenke Posted August 19, 2005 Posted August 19, 2005 I'm curious if any old message can be pulled across the city skies (at least for Seattle) or if there is a limit. Â You see advertisements and things like "Katy Smith, will you marry me?" but this is the first instance of propaganda I can recall. Next one to be seen: "Bush: talk to Cindy." Â I certainly would hate to see the skies running rampant with propaganda messages. Advertisements are bad enough. Quote
archenemy Posted August 19, 2005 Posted August 19, 2005 No kidding. Marketing is intrusive enough with their friggen bathroom adds and whatnot. It is getting out of hand. Pulling a banner like that through the sky is pollution. Quote
willstrickland Posted August 19, 2005 Posted August 19, 2005 You'll enjoy this one, spotted over the Superbowl in Houston   And this is always a nice sentiment to see coming from the great state of Washington:  Quote
archenemy Posted August 19, 2005 Posted August 19, 2005 Free speech is freedom to advertise. I understand. Hell, I even read our Constitution. It doesn't mention advertising, but it doesn't mention not yelling "fire" in a movie theater either. Â Fortunately, free speech also means I can bitch about this bs. Does the banner have the name of the group on it? I'd love to give them a call right now (since I am not doing anything useful at work...) Quote
murraysovereign Posted August 19, 2005 Posted August 19, 2005 Â Hmmm, lessee... F Dubya = FW = Fairweather? Â Quote
willstrickland Posted August 19, 2005 Posted August 19, 2005 I even read our Constitution. It doesn't mention advertising, but it doesn't mention not yelling "fire" in a movie theater either. Â Umm, yeah. Because as we know, the summer box-office smash, which won the Academy Award for best picture in 1789 was.... Quote
archenemy Posted August 19, 2005 Posted August 19, 2005 I even read our Constitution. It doesn't mention advertising, but it doesn't mention not yelling "fire" in a movie theater either. Â Umm, yeah. Because as we know, the summer box-office smash, which won the Academy Award for best picture in 1789 was.... Â OMG I feel sofa ging stu pid Quote
Fairweather Posted August 19, 2005 Posted August 19, 2005 Free speech is freedom to advertise. Â , For once. Quote
Fairweather Posted August 19, 2005 Posted August 19, 2005 Â Hmmm, lessee... F Dubya = FW = Fairweather? Â Â Fairweather would never drive/own/ride in a purple PT Cruiser. Â Quote
cj001f Posted August 19, 2005 Posted August 19, 2005 Fairweather would never drive/own/ride in a purple PT Cruiser. I saw you've sold the Fairweather mobile! http://www.christies.com/LotFinder/search/LOTDETAIL.ASP?sid=&intObjectID=4554134 Â "1982 ROLLS-ROYCE SILVER SPUR FOUR DOOR SALOON - Rainbow livery with tan leather interior" Quote
Dru Posted August 19, 2005 Posted August 19, 2005 Yeah cause a purple PT Cruiser is even more of a girly car than a yellow Jeep Wrangler convertible. Quote
j_b Posted August 19, 2005 Posted August 19, 2005 a russian group said last year they had the technology to advertise from space. just imagine sitting at your fav bivy spot and there it is, you just can't escape it. it is not an issue of free speech, clearly, and referring to specific words written >200 years ago to decide issue like that is an argument that only numbskulls would make. you're welcome. Quote
Clampooner Posted August 19, 2005 Posted August 19, 2005 Could be worse. They could be dragging excerpts of War and Peace behind the plane. Quote
Dru Posted August 19, 2005 Posted August 19, 2005 Well - free speech does not aply to grafitti either, does it? You got some Amendment Right to tag buildings or rocks? What about on your own property if your neighbours can see it? Quote
j_b Posted August 19, 2005 Posted August 19, 2005 Could be worse. They could be dragging excerpts of War and Peace behind the plane. Â true. Â a once in a while deal isn't so much a problem, it's when it becomes systematic (like squid's pollution of the spray section ) Quote
archenemy Posted August 19, 2005 Posted August 19, 2005 it is not an issue of free speech, clearly, and referring to specific words written >200 years ago to decide issue like that is an argument that only numbskulls would make. you're welcome. Â I think Dru was right to bring it up in this argument. But hell, he's a Canadian, right? We let the words that were written in that document decide many issues. 200 yrs is not that long; people still use words from a book written 2000 years ago to help guide their actions. Or maybe everyone but you is a numbskull? Quote
j_b Posted August 19, 2005 Posted August 19, 2005 Well - free speech does not aply to grafitti either, does it? You got some Amendment Right to tag buildings or rocks? What about on your own property if your neighbours can see it? Â pretty sticky issue, no doubt. if my neighbor forced me to see something that offended me everytime i looked out the window, i'd be pretty pissed. private property and free speech or not. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.