iain Posted February 6, 2004 Posted February 6, 2004 Here's something funny. "personal injury"? did someone choke on a chip or something? Quote
bunglehead Posted February 6, 2004 Posted February 6, 2004 Your posting that link and then me reading it caused me severe mental anguish. Get a lawyer, buddy, cause I'm gonna sue the pants off of you. Quote
Dru Posted February 6, 2004 Posted February 6, 2004 The fallout over Janet Jackson and Justin Timberlake's racy Super Bowl halftime performance continues, as a Tennessee woman has filed suit against the pair as well as halftime show producer MTV, broadcaster CBS and parent company Viacom. Knoxville native Terri Carlin filed a proposed class action lawsuit in a U.S. District Court on Wednesday, charging the accused with causing her and "millions of others" to "suffer outrage, anger, embarrassment and serious injury." The suit reportedly seeks billions of dollars in compensatory and punitive damages. The incident has raised nipples throughout the country. Congress is entertaining a bill that would increase the fine for airing "indecent" material during prime time from $27,500 to $270,000 (though if each CBS affiliate that aired the Super Bowl is hit with a fine, the $27,500 could turn to millions of dollars). Network television is also beginning to make preemptive changes with their upcoming programming. ABC will institute a five-second tape delay during its February 29th Academy Awards telecast, the first time the network has ever done so. And CBS will use a five-minute delay during this Sunday's Grammy Awards. Jackson and Timberlake's stunt -- both claim that Jackson's breast wasn't supposed to be fully exposed -- was seen by more than 90 million viewers, prompting the widespread outrage. According to a report, the Federal Communications Commission fielded 240,000 complaints about "indecency" on television in 2003; in the days since the Super Bowl, more than 200,000 have been logged. Must be those pasties. Quote
Stonehead Posted February 6, 2004 Posted February 6, 2004 (edited) Jackson and Timberlake's stunt -- both claim that Jackson's breast wasn't supposed to be fully exposed -- Uh, wasn't her breast covered by some kind of starburst thingy? Edited February 6, 2004 by Stonehead Quote
Stonehead Posted February 6, 2004 Posted February 6, 2004 (edited) Ye? I believe it's about time for an albino snaffle photo. More here. And does this remind you of anything? Edited February 6, 2004 by Stonehead Quote
fenderfour Posted February 6, 2004 Posted February 6, 2004 Yeah, the starburst works like the hood latches for the old muscle cars. Pull the pin through drop the ring on and insert retaining pin. For more fun check out www.bmezine.com Quote
Stonehead Posted February 6, 2004 Posted February 6, 2004 Oh. I was assuming that it crimps onto the nipple. That's hardcore. That site is weird. There's some phreaks out there. Like this one. Quote
bunglehead Posted February 6, 2004 Posted February 6, 2004 That's fucking wrong. I love my junk. I say hello to it first thing. Quote
EWolfe Posted February 6, 2004 Posted February 6, 2004 here's her piercing picture. Yowza, that's gotta hurt! Quote
HRoark Posted February 6, 2004 Posted February 6, 2004 That's one way to keep your sweater on in a stiff wind. Quote
EWolfe Posted February 6, 2004 Posted February 6, 2004 It's good to keep abreast of the issues. Quote
HRoark Posted February 6, 2004 Posted February 6, 2004 I'll bet that gets a tit nipply in the winter. Quote
sk Posted February 6, 2004 Posted February 6, 2004 that is the point of pircing.. it is never un nippy Quote
EWolfe Posted February 7, 2004 Posted February 7, 2004 this only exposes one side of the issue, while this really lets you know what's happening on both sides. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.