catbirdseat Posted October 29, 2003 Share Posted October 29, 2003 I saw Bowling for Columbine and I thought Michael Moore was being really mean to Terry Nichols brother James. What do you think? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
allthumbs Posted October 29, 2003 Share Posted October 29, 2003 I think less of you for going to see the movie in the first place. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr_Flash_Amazing Posted October 29, 2003 Share Posted October 29, 2003 That Nichols cat was clearly insane. People aren't s'posed to have that wild-eyed look all the time, especially when accompanied by nervous laughter and quips about the UN, black helos, etc. You sleep with a loaded gun under your pillow and let a bunch of people with cameras into your house and tell them about it, you're asking for it. Â Fuck the nutjob. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scrambler Posted October 29, 2003 Share Posted October 29, 2003 baby Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RobBob Posted October 29, 2003 Share Posted October 29, 2003 I remember when the story was breaking, seeing some Nichols family members in the background, I woulda sworn they were Mennonites by the beards and haircuts. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
j_b Posted October 29, 2003 Share Posted October 29, 2003 http://www.michaelmoore.com/words/wackoattacko/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RobBob Posted October 29, 2003 Share Posted October 29, 2003 I happened to see Michael Moore on "The View" a few weeks ago (I was in the gym on a treadmill, assclowns ). They pretty much turned him into a defensive little wanker with some good direct questioning about specific indiscrepancies in his diatribes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
catbirdseat Posted October 29, 2003 Author Share Posted October 29, 2003 Trask, are you going to read Moore's new book? It got a pretty good review. Â Publisher's Weekly: "Flush from the success of Stupid White Men and an Academy Award for best documentary, Moore continues his rhetorical assault on the Bush administration. The book shares much with Al Franken's Lies besides liberal sentiment and satirical tone; not only do both authors rely on the hoary device of having God tell them He doesn't support the president, but they each claim to pack their carry-on luggage with baseballs to bean would-be hijackers. But where Franken attacks individual conservatives, Moore focuses on issues. His first chapter is a series of unsettlingly specific questions (based on rigorously footnoted facts) about the political and financial ties among Bush, the Saudi Arabian government and Osama bin Laden's family, though he leaps from the facts to speculation when he wonders whether the September 11 attacks might have been hatched within the Saudi military. Other chapters attack the public's susceptibility to what he casts as the fear-mongering tactics the administration has used to justify foreign military interventions and, he says, the erosion of domestic civil liberties, and he lays plans for a Democratic victory in 2004: in addition to a half-serious nomination of Oprah, he offers a prescient, reasoned and highly favorable evaluation of Wesley Clark as a candidate. Moore's arguments work best when delivered mostly straight, since he isn't always as funny as he seems to think he is. Straightforward propositions leavened with humor, like a guide to talking to conservative relatives, work fine, while efforts at flat-out farce ring hollow. But expect liberals to once again eagerly support one of their most prominent spokesmen by checking this out at the cash register. (Oct. 7) Copyright 2003 Reed Business Information. " Â Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
j_b Posted October 29, 2003 Share Posted October 29, 2003 RobBob said: I happened to see Michael Moore on "The View" a few weeks ago (I was in the gym on a treadmill, assclowns ). They pretty much turned him into a defensive little wanker with some good direct questioning about specific indiscrepancies in his diatribes. Â which discrepancies? specifically. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
allthumbs Posted October 29, 2003 Share Posted October 29, 2003 someone needs to off moore Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bird Posted October 29, 2003 Share Posted October 29, 2003 trask said: someone needs to off moore  I bet his time will come sooner than he thinks. This is what tends to happen to people who tend to speak out on gun control. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
catbirdseat Posted October 29, 2003 Author Share Posted October 29, 2003 Everyone has opinions. Some people are able to express them more eloquently than others. Moore's only weapons have been words and yet there are those that appear to have been gravely wounded. They want to kill him for ideas. If that were to happen he would be a martyr for sure, and his ideas would be even more powerful. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
allthumbs Posted October 30, 2003 Share Posted October 30, 2003 who fuckin cares? dude's a worthless piece of shit 'cept to those that suck as bad as him. shit happens Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bird Posted October 30, 2003 Share Posted October 30, 2003 trask said: who fuckin cares? dude's a worthless piece of shit 'cept to those that suck as bad as him. shit happens  I bet a lot of people would care. I for one would be outraged. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
allthumbs Posted October 30, 2003 Share Posted October 30, 2003 wtf-outraged by what? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
j_b Posted October 30, 2003 Share Posted October 30, 2003 trask said: someone needs to off moore  hey sicko, you think you can make idle threats on the net without consequences? you better hope that nothing happens to him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
allthumbs Posted October 30, 2003 Share Posted October 30, 2003 fuck off pissant  Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr_Flash_Amazing Posted October 30, 2003 Share Posted October 30, 2003 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
j_b Posted October 30, 2003 Share Posted October 30, 2003 ha! yes, i forgot, trask is such a funny guy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlpineK Posted October 30, 2003 Share Posted October 30, 2003 j_b said: ha! yes, i forgot, trask is such a funny guy  You could learn a lot from Task,...pissant Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
erik Posted October 30, 2003 Share Posted October 30, 2003 AlpineK said: You could learn a lot from Task,...pissant  tho is self shocking yourself really something anyone other then trask should know?   Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
j_b Posted October 30, 2003 Share Posted October 30, 2003 AlpineK said: j_b said: ha! yes, i forgot, trask is such a funny guy  You could learn a lot from Task,...pissant  if you think that 99% of those who read trask's drivel do not take it in the first degree, you are deluding yourself. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlpineK Posted October 30, 2003 Share Posted October 30, 2003 j_b said: AlpineK said: j_b said: ha! yes, i forgot, trask is such a funny guy  You could learn a lot from Task,...pissant  if you think that 99% of those who read trask's drivel do not take it in the first degree, you are deluding yourself.  Well I suspect you take it in the ass. not that there's anything wrong with that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
j_b Posted October 30, 2003 Share Posted October 30, 2003 AlpineK said: Well I suspect you take it in the ass. not that there's anything wrong with that. Â if you did not think there was something wrong with it, why would you even mention it. at least, be consistent. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlpineK Posted October 30, 2003 Share Posted October 30, 2003 j_b said: AlpineK said: Well I suspect you take it in the ass. not that there's anything wrong with that. Â if you did not think there was something wrong with it, why would you even mention it. at least, be consistent. Â Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.