Jump to content

More on taxes


Peter_Puget

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 129
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Oh please, not this again. If the upper incomes are getting so screwed then why has the large gap between the upper end and everyone else been increasing the fastest ever in the last 20 years. Gimme a break. Marginal tax rates are the lowest they've been in 50 years, the inheritance tax is fazing out. Oh poor guys, they have such a heavy burden.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would say that all the top earners should be paying more of the total share, but why does the bottom 50% always complain that they are paying too many taxes. They may as well not pay anything... plus, how many of them are the main recipients of tax dollars from the top earners?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let's look at it this way. If the total wealth in the country was $100, this is the way it would be distributed:

 

1 person gets $38.10

 

4 people get $5.32 each

 

5 people get $2.30 each

 

10 people get $1.25 each

 

20 people get .60 each

 

20 people get .23 each

 

40 people get 1/2 cent each

 

 

Given the current marginal tax rates I'd say the upper incomes are getting a deal.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Marginal tax rates are the lowest they've been in 50 years, the inheritance tax is fazing out. Oh poor guys, they have such a heavy burden.

 

If you're going to look back 50 years, might as well look back 100 years. No marginal tax at all, right?

 

I prefer flat consumption tax. Use it---pay it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Peter - I did read your link. You must have missed my point in my post. Your link cited productivity per capitia, and yes the US has a higher rate than the EU. But that is because US workers WORK MORE HOURS than any other country. When you figure out the productivity per hour the US drops behind the EU. So while they have more time off, they're more productive per hour.

 

Bottom line is that marginal tax rates are at lows not seen in at least 50 years. No reasons for whinning at the upper levels.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Peter_Puget said:

My link expressly addresses productivity per hour . You originally claimed that some EU nations had productivity per hour higher than the US. Now you seem to be suggesting that the EU on average has a higher productivity per hour. Which is it? rolleyes.gif

 

PP bigdrink.gif

 

I don't see your point PP

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Actually your link mixes measurements. While productivity is mention once per hour, the author switches back to GDP per capitia. This may be his intention but it's not clear. The source link doesn't work so hard to figure out.

 

I have read a summary that states otherwise. It's at home so I could rummage for it. But the summary is that the primary reason our GDP and per capitis productivity is high is that we WORK MORE HOURS than other countries. I haven't changed my tune on this point.

 

Productivity has doubled since 1969. Yet, unlike Europe, where productivity gains have translated into stable incomes and shorter hours, American employers have kept down wages and increased hours.

 

The average work isn't any better than a worker in 1970. So where did the profit go from all this productivity increase. Rewind to the income distribution chart.

 

Yea I know, lower taxes, lower taxes. Either that or bomb someone. Always a good answer.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jim said:

Oh please, not this again. If the upper incomes are getting so screwed then why has the large gap between the upper end and everyone else been increasing the fastest ever in the last 20 years. Gimme a break. Marginal tax rates are the lowest they've been in 50 years, the inheritance tax is fazing out. Oh poor guys, they have such a heavy burden.

 

So, because successful people ARE successful that means you have a right to THEIR income, THEIR wealth, and THEIR labor? I don't understand this mentality. People talk about equality and 'fairness', but turn a blind eye when they see statistics like are in that chart. On a percentage basis, why should someone earning $250,000 pay more than someone earning $30,000? And come up with something better than, "because they can afford it". That is not a logical reason. A flat tax is fair and equitable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well I would disagree. I think inherent fairness is one part of a tax code. And certainly there should be limits. The trickle down theory of economics has been discredited, so let's not go down that road.

 

And again I would point to the widening economic gap between rich and poor. If the rich are hurtin' so much then why are they raking in more and more?

 

No whinning please.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jim said:

If the rich are hurtin' so much then why are they raking in more and more?

 

It's not a matter of "hurting." It is a matter of entitlement; the government claims an entitlement to the earned wealth of people who work hard and are successful. They exercise this entitlement in an unfair, and unequal way. They punish, in essence, those who have made themselves successful by imposing upon them higher taxes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

HRoark said:

Jim said:

If the rich are hurtin' so much then why are they raking in more and more?

 

It's not a matter of "hurting." It is a matter of entitlement; the government claims an entitlement to the earned wealth of people who work hard and are successful. They exercise this entitlement in an unfair, and unequal way. They punish, in essence, those who have made themselves successful by imposing upon them higher taxes.

 

Oh brother, you know, I'm gonna start crying here for the upper 10% soon if you keep it up. Poor babies. One more time - tax rates have been coming steadily down for the upper incomes - lower marginal rates, fazing out of the inheritance tax, lowering the capital gains tax.

 

Plus if you're in the upper 10% or so you have the capability of using the tax laws to help you, gifting, living trusts, insurance investments.

 

I'm not buying it. You earn more you pay more. No way that 10% off a $30,000 income means the same as 10% off a $3 million dollar income.

 

Gotta go key our some Alaskan sedges - later.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, Jim, you make more you pay more. However, the current system exacts a much higher percentage of those who earn more. If the percentage was the same for everyone, the upper 10% would still pay more than the lower 50%.

 

Oh, and thanks for responding in a logically thought out way. What type of response is "I'm not crying for them"? You are sidestepping the issue I brought up which is the blatantly unfair method of taxation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jim:

 

I would have to go searching for documentation to back it up - don't have time to google at the moment - but I recall reading a few papers which demonstrated that every time the top marginal tax rates have been lowered, the percentage of all taxes paid by the wealthiest Americans has increased, rather than decreased (maybe PP has a link).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




×
×
  • Create New...