Jump to content

DPS

Members
  • Posts

    4372
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    24

Posts posted by DPS

  1. Darin,

     

    Please don't take this as an attack, but I'm curious what your position on bolts in the mountains is, seeing how you've bolted new routes on Vesper and are advocating their use in the NCNP yet publicly stated your opposition to them at Washington Pass.

     

    The continued comfortization of Washington Pass is weak sauce.

     

    Bolts added to 4th class climbs, top-down power-drilled sport climbs on the east faces of Liberty Bell and South Early. Now convenience rap stations where 1000's managed without.

     

    Yeah sure it's next to a highway blah-blah-blah. But they are still some of our more outstanding mountains and the continual need to keep dumbing down the climbing experience in the alpine is sad. All the more so in that it's being done for a profit motive (So what Sol said!).

     

    So y'all have fun with their handy work! I'm super glad you're all going to be able to get home now 5 minutes quicker.

  2. Staring at this route over a couple days this summer, I'm impressed that folks still climb it. Frankly, it scared the hell out of me. It looks like Dan and Jesse climbed it in similar conditions to what we saw this July, maybe worse.

     

    Bold, and a wee bit lucky. That is an ascent that I'm sure you won't forget.

     

    We nearly got taken out by rockfall low on the route and serac fall high up. I feel like a guardian angel was watching out for us on that one and I think we were more than a little lucky.

  3. one downside on markers is that you have to remove the binding to go from ski to walk and vice versa.

     

    Can you elaborate? Do you mean the binding has to be removed from the ski or you have to step out of the binding? If the former, does this operation require tools?

  4. I'm moving to a lighter ski this year (K2 Shuksan from BD Havoc) for most back country touring and ski mountaineering trips. I'm going to remount my Dynafit binders from my current Havocs.

     

    I'm toying with the idea of getting something like the Marker Dukes/Barons (on sale for much cheaper than Dynafits/tech biners) for my Havocs for lift serviced slack country type of skiing. They come with brakes which I like for in bounds and as I mentioned are much cheaper than tech binders. The penalty seems to be in weight, but for lift serviced skiing I don't see that as a huge issue.

     

    Any thoughts from the ski experts? If money was not an issue I'd get another pair of tech binders, but I'm not made of money and the Markers would save considerable coin.

     

    TIA,

     

    Dan

  5. I have week days free until mid October. I'd like to do some cragging - Leavenworth is my favorite this time of year. This is my first season climbing after a long absence and I'm weak and rusty. I can lead up to 5.7. I have a rope, rack and wheels. Happy to climb easy stuff with newer climbers, happy to follow experienced climbers, but only on slightly harder routes.

     

    Email daniel DASH p DASH smith AT hotmail DOT com or PM me here.

     

    Thanks,

     

    Dan

  6. I've got a new (one day of use) Wild Things Andinista. Size Large, Blue. It's huge.

     

    $100.

    Is the Andinista available to anyone for $100, or is this special pricing for Pat? I know a guy who could use a pack like that.

  7. I pretty much agree with Gene. No one pair of boots will be ideal for skiing, ski mountaineering and ice climbing. Climbing Lib Ridge or Reid Glacier Headwall and skiing down in AT boots is reasonable, but the climbing on these routes is not particularly technical. You really want a more sensitive boot for waterfall climbing. I own three pairs of ice climbing boots and two pairs of AT boots and that is probably on the low end compared to many folks' quivers. I guess my advice would be to get a good all around ice climbing/mountaineering boot now for this ice season and get your AT setup when you can afford it.

  8. CCWs are old school in a good way, and not all that heavy. I do wonder about the lack of back support, though (they just come with a foam sheet, unless I read the specs wrong).

    My buddy Nick has a CCW Chaos and it only has a folded foam pad for a frame. On steep rock on Mt Hunter he complained he felt his pack was 'cutting him in half'.

  9.  

    A question to those of you who have been where I am: what is the next logical step? Bigger? Faster? Yes, but how much?

    The next logical step is to to quit soloing while you're ahead. :grin: While I often viewed alpine climbs as a series of progressive steps, I never thought of soloing in that light. For me, soloing was something I did spontaneously when I felt strong or when I needed some exercise in which case I'd solo the Tooth (Toothercising) or something similar or when I couldn't get a partner. In those latter instances I only soloed well below my ability. I never thought of pushing my soloing into bigger/harder routes. I did get caught up in speed soloing the Tooth, only because Keith Mark Johnson said it couldn't be done much faster than his time so I had to go and see for myself.

  10. I've climbed the WR of Stuart three times. Once, ropeless with BigEO, via the classic West Ridge route in running shoes in a day. Another time via the Stuart Glacier Couloir and a third time via the West Ridge Couloir. I've also soloed the South Face of the Tooth around two dozen times. IMNSHO, the climbing on Stuart is more technical. Not by a bunch, but by a bit and in a couple of spots is more exposed. One would be hard pressed to fall very far without landing on a ledge on the Tooth, but the north side traverse pitch on WR Stuart is very exposed and has over 1,000 feet of air under one's heels. I feel that pitch alone is harder than anything on the Tooth and would pretty much be a death fall. These are just my opinions, just as valid as anyone's, but I've been around the block once or twice, so they are not exactly without some context.

×
×
  • Create New...