BootsandPants

Up!

I'm 5'9" 170 and the regular is cut a little narrower than other bags I've used, but after the first few times using it I stopped noticing. Haven't had and compression issues due to it being cut a little narrow though. Trying one out will be the only way to know for sure though.

Bump. Don't like the price? Make me an offer, I'm a pretty reasonable person

I picked one up last year, and it was one of the first ones in Pertex. It saw a lot of use so far and I really like it. If I had to buy it again, I'd probably still go with the Pertex or Nano (not sure if they still make them in nano?). I did 2oz of overfill, one in the feet and one in the torso. Coldest I've been out in it was probably mid-teens and I was alright.

Like new Feathered Friends Volant jacket size L with hood. This jacket was sewn a little less than a year ago and has been used less than five times. Never climbed anything technical in it, only a few snow slogs and bivys. Sewn out of Event fabric, it'll keep the 850+ fill down on the inside dry through anything you throw at it. Awesome jacket for belays, bivys with lighter sleeping bags, longer expeditions, or just bumming around camp. It's just too warm for me and what I'd need it for. The jacket has been very well cared for, no stains or smells. Stored fully lofted on a hanger. Will included a FF stuff sack Paid $450+tax retail for the event fabric, and $50 for the hood. Asking $300, add for shipping (~$10) if not a local deal. Please PM me with any questions you may have. Thanks! [img:center]http://i.imgur.com/uksdf.jpg[/img] [img:center]http://i.imgur.com/Wf7f5.jpg[/img]

I don't mind paying a little more for something if it's good quality and the company will stand behind their product. With some of these companies, the warranty is worth the price alone. Outdoor Research's lifetime warranty is exceptional and I've been a fan of their stuff for a while now. They've replaced two pairs of gloves, two jackets, and a pair of pants for me over the years, no questions asked, just go grab a new one off of the rack. This sort of customer service and faith in their own product is worth the extra $$$ over the cheap stuff in my opinion. OR, MHW, and Arcteryx are all companies that I, or those I climb with, have had great personal experience getting warranties honored.

PM on that other other ascender

I don't think it would be a concern as long as it looks to be in good condition. I'll check my WC slings when I get home and see if they have the same issue. I've had mine for about a year too, so it'll be interesting to compare.

I'm not hating on fat skis, just saying I don't understand them for use here in the Cascades. I spent 15 years skiing in Pennsylvania (a.k.a. downhill ice skating) before moving out here so my background is definitely different. A pair of skis I'd take out only maybe 3-4 times a season seems a little much for me. I spend a fair amount of time teaching at Stevens and am always surprised at the amount of superfat skis I see people using when we haven't seen more than a few inches of new snow, or none at all. Does excessive amounts of rocker or early rise really help them that much on hardpack? Getting that much ski up on edge seems a chore. Guess there's just some sort learning curve? I spent all weekend on a pair of K2 Sideshows I just picked up and had a blast. Floaty enough in the morning, but when things got tracked out, they blasted through the mank and absolutely RAILED on the pack, almost as snappy as my GS skis. I didn't float as much as those guys with pontoons, but I sure got more faceshots . These are going to be awesome in the BC. I do want to try some Shamans as I've heard a lot of good things about that ski and the shape intrigues me. Line's Influence (105 or 115) is also an awesome ski that's new this year. Not really a touring option as they're kind of heavy, but a fun fatty for sidecountry or short tours that can rail the cord. To each their own though, the only thing that matters is that we're all having fun making lines in the snow!

I got to demo a pair of LS Hang 5s from LMS at Vertfest the other weekend. Fun ski in those conditions, but generally too wide for my tastes (they were 117 under foot). They were fun in the steep and deep, but everywhere else I'd prefer something narrower and more manageable. I guess I just don't get the superfat ski craze (>100mm waist) that's going on, at least for here in the Cascades. The demo skis also had the LS binders on them too and they seemed burly enough to drive those planks through what I was putting them through. Amazing, but not worth the extra $$$ over the other tech binding options in my opinion. Glad you like the 'slus Tvash. 92 underfoot seems to be in a nice sweetspot between just wide enough to provide float and just narrow enough to be manageable ihmo. Have fun out there!

Sad story. Peace to those who were lost and their friends and family. Didn't a slide happen in this same place last season that ended up killing someone? Can't find the record though.

Awesome, thanks Kurt!

Price drop

Those are the two big reasons I use the Onyx as well. I wanted a tech binding for touring but something burly enough to deal with some inbounds riding. A nice third reason is that there is about 30mm of adjustability of the binding on the plates, which enables the use of different boots without having to remount. Those features are worth the "heaviness" of the binding to me. I'll just take a dump before the tour to make up for that extra weight I've been using the Onyx pretty hard in and out of bounds since it was introduced back in 2009 and have had no problems with them whatsoever. Great binding and one of the best options out there in terms of usability goes. I noticed that last year's models were on sale at Marmot the last time I was in there Link. Cheaper and better than fritschis imo; worth a look if you're interested. Have fun out there!

I've been using Nepal Evos for 4 years now and I love them. I've got a large forefoot, high instep and narrow heel (makes fitting boots a frustrating challenge). They seem to fit my foot great, but the Mont Blancs didn't. This surprised me as I had heard the same about the scarpa fit (wider+more volume). Moral of the story, try 'em both on and go with the best fit. They're both great boots for mountaineering and ice climbing. Good luck!

Go skiing.

Thanks, updated. Not sure how to make it so the pictures aren't huge. Standard BBCode doesn't seem to work.

Nice job guys. I didn't realize that was Matt for a while in that green jacket and thought some random was just climbing with you. Looked like a good day out! Much better than a day spent nursing a hangover from a liter of whisky.

Good work guys. Your TR is missing a critical piece of beta though; what scotch did you bring?

Bumpage

I have too many skis, so I need to trim down the quiver a bit before moving. These are the orange version of the Rapid Transits (178 128/91/116) from a few seasons back. I bought them at the beginning of last season, and it's a blast of a ski to run on. However, I overestimated the length so it's just too much ski for my feeble attempts at telemarking. Bases are in awesome shape, no core shots or p-tex work and have been kept waxed and happy. Topsheets show normal ski wear. Mounted once with hammerhead bindings. G3 sez: Thanks to its asymmetrical shape and ample dimensions, the G3 Rapid Transit Ski floats the pow, kills the crud, and holds a tight line in any conditions. An aggressive flex and moderately-stout dimensions help the Rapid Transit plow through any snow like the express train to gnar-town. Asymmetrical design uses shorter turning radius on skis inside edge for more precise edge-to-edge transitions and crisper turns Fat 91mm waist provides both float and stability for playing in the powder or destroying the crud Bottom Line: Guide-worthy versatility with unmatched turning abilities. http://i.imgur.com/OOkVV.jpg[/img] [img:center]http://i.imgur.com/FHn9D.jpg[/img] Looking for $250 for the skis, $300 for skis + bindings. Prefer a local deal but would gladly ship if buyer pays for shipping. I can take more pictures if needed as well. Just let me know.

I'm a lot like you, I don't want my career to rule my life. I also wrestled with the same decisions you're making with grad school, and from my experience these other comments ring true. Really, don't make a decision on extracurricular things, especially for grad school. Those are just that, extra. "Get into the best school you can" is sage advice. Your degree is an investment in your future, don't invest in "adequate" just for the short term payoff when you could be getting more. If it happens to work out in your favor, awesome! If not, you'll find some new, fun hobbies to keep you occupied. That's how I picked up hockey, curling, and tournament paintball

A 40L size is a good sort of do-it-all pack imo. Enough room for technical gear and overnight gear, but not too much room to tempt you to bring unnecessary items. The Marmot looks good and would work fine as long as you were diligent in your packing. Sweet price too. I've gotten by with a 35L with technical rock gear for two nights out in the past and was never in want of anything, except maybe a beer, so you should be alright.

Used this the other day and it's great! Maps actually print borderless too, which is awesome. No more having to manipulate screen shots. Nice job and thanks for your efforts!

Anyone try the K2 Backup or Sideshow? I've been looking for something narrower than what I tour on now for days when the conditions dictate. I do want the metal laminate and progressive sidecut of these skis (rules out the Wayback). Would mount with tech binders for sure (G3 swap plates ftw).