Bad arguements Minx, as was your last post. Just because somebody plunked in an anchor somewhere, dosen't mean that the next person now must forwver suffer it being there because some dick head wanted to put in in and it's in now so everyone MUST now leave it there.
Pffsssst.
As far as you being a weak climber and needing a short anchor. Well, that arguement is weak as well, why not just stay in the gym instead of lowering the climbs to your level?
Frankly, Dcramer has an arguement for leaving it there that is hard to argue against, ie, 1) it's pretty much always been there and 2) it's a damn good place, being a no hands nice little stance right there.
lets see here bill,
DC says that since it's pretty much always been there leave it--funny, i think i made the same point.
i guess i just don't see the difference. i thought i was pretty clear. it's already there. leave it alone. no point in undoing it--there'll still be a scar. i don't approve bolting cracks. i don't see why you have a problem with my saying it but it's OK if someone else says it.
why am i obligated to become a 5.10+ climber? i am perfectly happy climbing 5.10- with the amount of time i have to climb. climbin a few grades lower than you doesn't make my opinion less valid.
i can't help but think that you're a total dickhead who just doesn't like me.
minx, stop acting like a chick before you give couchmaster a complex. just becauce bill disagree's with you, doesn't mean he dislikes you. he is a dude, and dudes don't operate like that. go back to your cubicle and log bac on when your cycle is over.
