Dechristo

variable volume levels [video:youtube]

This thread is fubar

There's but one face without a smile: his with The Job ahead of him still.

lick it's back and you'll believe

accidental liberal death caused by (?) ____________ .

Bullshit. The uncertainty expressed in your first statement can be remedied by the error (arguably) in observation in the second. It should then include the non-accidental deaths precipitated by medical professionals.

Facebooks are textbooks for those that study Oriental facial diagnosis. I can tell by your lips you have an anal fissure.

Ya. Theesguys had a simmiller expeeryence. [video:youtube]

Miss Piggy is Secretary of Commerce!12/?

and, on soft paper.

Sounds like some are in a journeyman program to learn how.

Is that the union tenure required to learn to smoke and tuna penis?

Cheeky bastard

Comm join the party instead of muttering to yerself over there in the corner.

It's his method of processing including the adding and mixing of salsa.

Like the Cleveland Indians. "I did not know that."

"Co-organiser Pinki, who hopes those attending will meet someone nice "

Why should he? He's worked hard - let him enjoy himself. Fuck him. There are many that work much harder than he in this country. That's bullshit. I'll wager they do if and when larger quantities are involved.

So, you're more concerned with, and obsessing over, people with families making (god forbid) $50k as opposed to MBA's making $1-300m even when they fail. 2007 bonuses alone on Wall Street amounted to $33b - that's 660,000 $50k families worth. Or, the $15k necessary to bring 2,200,000 families up from $35k to $50k. Personally, I don't think we're getting our money's worth as a society. This could all be addressed and served through tax restructuring, tailored in a creative way. I know. It's irresponsible, fantasy talk of a wild-eyed revolutionary.

Yes one reason for this is collective bargaining by the union for the American dream of a family wage The other is most of the upcoming work force does not want to get their hands dirty or bleed or sweat for a pay check, which made a shortage of young workers coming into the trades or manufacturing industry, compound this by the fact the majority of the younger generation was put through collage by mommy and daddy and then there education was out sourced to overseas by their mommy’s and daddy’s generation hence you have blue collar workers making as much as white collar workers Oh and BTW if you have ever worked around the areo space of auto industry you would find out it's the collage educated idiot's being overpaid and wasting all the money not the poor smuck that had to go to work after high skool and was working part time at the age of 13 through skool like I did GO OBAMA !!!!! So, the only ones not at fault are you and Obama.

cut and run bastard

Is it not enough that the issue has the slightest evidence of reduction? or, simply that its presence at all must be suffered?

kinda like Minnesota

...regardless of appearance. I do not assert that racism and xenophobia are not absent from today's military conflicts - hell, it's in every culture around the planet. I do assert that collateral damage in loss of civilian lives due to these elements is reduced today, by and large, due to cognitive awareness of the factor not present in the past.

hmmm. I believe I adequately addressed and refuted your statement of "racism/xenophobia routinely used to justify collateral damage" by referencing a conflict that took place 65-years ago when racism and xenophobia was, I believe, a much larger factor than today. A conflict where the loss of civilian human life took place in a staggeringly and relatively greater number; where those were of similar appearance. In today's conflicts, our troops often and routinely make great sacrifices (certainly compared to past military conflicts) to limit/minimize the loss of civilian lives. Reciprocally, I regard your response as an effort to obfuscate and as disingenuous. Lest it is simply a case of your need to have all things spelled out for you where unspoken associated elements are assumed.