KaskadskyjKozak

I agree with Foley's statement: Clinton had immense potential and squandered it. But at least Clinton had potential. Foley was never in the same league.

oh, the humanity!

There's the whole NAMBLA taboo that really turns on republicans. that's funny, you seem to be the one with the NAMBLA fixation. You mention them at every opportunity and even posted a link to their website once on cc.com. Oh, yeah,

It's not a good day to be a Democrat or a Republican. The parties are just two big steaming fucking piles right now.

The Kurds have been screwed over again and again throughout history. I can't think of a people that have been so long without their own country, occupied and subjugated by others. The biggest problem with Kurdistan is it is a threat to Turkey and Iran where significant Kurd populations would love to secede and join a greater Kurdistan.

uh-oh

are you implying KK is hawkish? or that a certain part of his anatomy is a battleground? hey now

reminds me of a (sophmoric) joke: what does Dracula use for teabags?

the point? oh, you mean the beginning of "feel good gestures" (never mind the results). the birth of American liberalism.

The irony is that the New Deal policies were not ultimately responsible for the turaround in the economy; the war effort was.

we did more than drop nukes (i.e. fire bombing of German and Japanese cities ).

Racist!

So you say. I believe nothing that the left says. Such is our current state of affairs in this country. The boy has cried wolf one too many times, and there's been far too much hyperbole for me to believe any of what is being posited about this bill in this debate. Read the fucking bill yourself you dumbshit. You can read can't you? Fuck you, shithead.

So you say. I believe nothing that the left says. Such is our current state of affairs in this country. The boy has cried wolf one too many times, and there's been far too much hyperbole for me to believe any of what is being posited about this bill in this debate.

Effectively what our "civil rights for terrorists" advocates do is to tie one hand behind our backs, beat soldiers and policy makers about the head constantly (and bite at their ankles), while humming their mantra of "we're losing, it's unwinnable, blah blah".

yeah, right. Keep oversimplifying the political motivations and belief systems of your opponents. It will make you feel better about yourself, and, oh so much smarter than those with whom you disagree.

can you say... thread drift?

I think it would be better to vote out all incumbents at every election for a few years. Who cares that the balance of power would toggle every 2 years in the house. It would at least put the fear of God into those a-holes.

smoke another bowl dude.

this planet and the people on it would certainly be in better shape without you

Canadian school children watch her program during class time. It's their version of abstinence education (images of that lady combined with those devices would make anyone lose all sexual desires...). It helps keep Canadians from being obese as well ... the show regularly induces purging/vomiting.

with the specifics of said-limitation defined by you and your chosen political party, of course.

I read somewhere recently that in Canada is was illegal for religious organizations to publicly say that "homosexuality is a sin". The great white north is so progressive... and free...

propaganda = a point of view you disagree with broadcast on the public airwaves. all broadcasts dealing with a controversial issue have a POV and will offend someone, and cause some disagreement/outrage. this whole debate is good fodder (by extension) for why the gov't should not be funding PBS, NPR or any other "public" broadcasting.